I vote we call it The He-man Women Haters club:
[youtube]wBIC8JTQMMQ[/youtube]
He-Man Women Haters Club Meeting - YouTube
[youtube]wBIC8JTQMMQ[/youtube]
He-Man Women Haters Club Meeting - YouTube
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Yet my question was what were the DIFFERENCES; i.e. how does this not apply equally to both.
I don't think there needs to be a masculinist board, let alone have a preference on the colour, nor do I think it should be reactionary, however that does not mean we should ignore a clear issue of differentiation based on gender with what seems extremely limited functional basis by which to justify such differentiation.Why should it? Why should masculinism define itself as a reactionary movement to feminism? If there is to be a forum, it should be for masculist discussion, and on masculist terms.
I don't think there needs to be a masculinist board, let alone have a preference on the colour, nor do I think it should be reactionary, however that does not mean we should ignore a clear issue of differentiation based on gender with what seems extremely limited functional basis by which to justify such differentiation.
And were it solely based on the preferences of users of that board if/when created (not members in general, but users of that board) I would wholeheartedly accept since the differentiation would then seem to indicate more about users of said boards than of policy. I simply noted the lack of functional differentiation in topics and questioned why there would then be a differentiation in board status.Well...put it this way.
I don't think there's a need for a masculinist board either. I'd just put the threads on the main boards. That being the case, I'd argue for a more permissive colour.
I had no say, and nor should I have, in the colour-coding of the feminist board. Rather than comparing feminist board to masculinist board, I'd rather just work out what colour I think a masculinist board should be, if it does exist.
Since I don't identify myself as a masculinist, but might be interested in the topics, I vote green.
"Foundation"? That sounds so institutional.I would absolutely love there to be a MRA DIR. As someone who is well versed in MRA, I would jump at the opportunity at establishing a foundation for Men's Rights here, and as well as taking the opportunity to correct many fallacies that I have seen here, in this thread, about MRA.
"Foundation"? That sounds so institutional.
Let's call it a "watering hole".
It sounds rather lace hanky, but OK....it still beats "foundation".Aww, what's the matter Rev, you don't want a tea room? You could hold little tea parties in it. Oh come on, have a tea room.
I'm a woman but in my opinion, men should have their own forum too.
It sounds rather lace hanky, but OK....it still beats "foundation".
Couldn't you all just call it "The Man Cave"
Couldn't you all just call it "The Man Cave"