That's exactly what I see in you, deliberate obtuseness because of your Christian preconceived notions. You are not focussed on the Decalogue when reading the Ten Commandments. "For the Lord your God am an impassioned God visiting the guilty of the parents upon the children, upon the the third generation and upon the fourth generations of those who reject Me." That's obvious; it has nothing to do with dying for the sins of another.
You are the one who says a person cannot die for the sins of another.
We are talking about God visiting the sins of the father upon the children of those who hate them to the third and fourth generation.
If you had any idea what you were talking about you would have know those sins held against the descendants of those persons down to third and fourth generation.
If no one could die for sins then the scapegoat and the sacrifices for sin would never have removed the sins of the Israelites by the high priest.
You cannot have it both ways either someone can die for sin or it cannot die for sin. But the truth is that WE all died because of Adams sin.
No, Adam was not supposed to live forever. No one who had a beginning could live forever. (Genesis 3:22,23)
22And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
The evidence in there in the bible as you see above.
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
16.And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17.But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
The evidence that Adam was suppose to live forever is that he was given the right to eat from the tree of life clearly growing in the garden as was the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Adam told not to eat of only one tree. It was to stop him living forever in his fallen state that he was removed from the Garden.
Genesis 2 and 3 prove Adam was meant to live for ever and that he lost the right to the fruit from the tree of life when he sinned. This condemned us all to death.
So one mans sin condemned us all to death. Nothing can change the evidence in the Torah.
I looked and saw that none believed in bodily resurrection. If you read David, II Samuel 12:23, David testified that there is no bodily resurrection. I read Job 7:9; 10:21; and 14:12 and saw that he never believed in bodily resurrection. Bodily resurrection is a Christian doctrine which Christianity copied from Hellenism. What I saw in Elijah 11, it was an euphemism used by Elisha to promote postmortem honer to Elijah.
I actually wrote: Look at Dives and Lazarus and look at the Pharisee and Sadducee. Different beliefs and one believed in resurrection.
Acts 23:8.
King James Bible
For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
You are clearly mis representing the death of Davids child whom God said would die because of his adultery with Uriah's wife Bathsheba. He sent her husband to the front to die having
seen her bathe on a roof top and then he had sex with her and she became pregnant. He sent for Uriah to return home hoping he would sleep with his wife and pass the baby off as his own.
But Uriah would not do this whilst his men still fighting. So David sent him to the front to die. The Lord told David the child would die and he mourned the death even before and hoped God
would repent. In fact his child died because of his sin, did he not? Didn't God put the punishment of Davids sin and Bathsheba on their child? Did his child not die because of the Fathers sin?
You say they could not bring him back from the dead but the fact is you also forget the womans son whom Elisha raised from the dead.
2 Kings 4: 32-35.
32 And when Elisha was come into the house, behold, the child was dead, and laid upon his bed.
33 He went in therefore, and shut the door upon them twain, and prayed unto the Lord.
34 And he went up, and lay upon the child, and put his mouth upon his mouth, and his eyes upon his eyes, and his hands upon his hands: and stretched himself upon the child; and the flesh of the child waxed warm.
35 Then he returned, and walked in the house to and fro; and went up, and stretched himself upon him: and the child sneezed seven times, and the child opened his eyes.
Nothing is impossible for God even the dead were raised by the power of God through the Prophets. In your own words you have proven from Gods words that children are punished for their fathers sin and even died as Davids child because of their Fathers sin. Then we see that the dead can be resurrected even in this life as Elisha shows us. That God is able to do the impossible.
So we have established that Davids child punished for Davids sin and David punished by his child dying because of his sin. We have seen God did resurrect the dead through Elisha.
We also know that the Pharisee believed in the resurrection, angels and spirits. The latter mentioned in Acts 23:8 but confirmed by literature and information about Pharisees through the ages.
That's how Christian preconceived notions cause Christians to take when paraphrasing the Tanach. That 's not true. What do you have as an evidence that Elijah's body did not die, faith? That's evidence of nothing. Nothing can be evidence of anything forever. Only Elohim is forever. Melchizedek was only a pagan king among the ancient Canaanites offering their firstborn sons to Baal Molech on the fire. Elijah was taken down to Sheol aka grave, the eternal home of the dead. (Psalms 49:12,20) No one can prove bodily resurrection, even Orthodox Judaism which you you claim here. If you are so fan of resurrection, why don't you join them?
The rest of the bible actually quoted above proves you wrong on all accounts. No preconceived Christian notions here. Whilst I believe the NT contains truth. I believe like Jesus Christ,
the Disciples and the Prophets that the Torah and teachings of the Prophets are the true scripture and word of God. I believe this is the ONLY scripture referred to as scripture in the NT
and I believe in ONE God and his Son Jesus Christ. But I believe that God educated me in the OT so we can discern the truth about him first, to serve him first. And to recognise the mis preconceived notion of his Messiah and what men went on to believe. Jesus taught us that God was to be put before everyone, which included himself.
King James Bible
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Berean Study Bible
But Jesus replied, "It is written: 'Worship the Lord your God and serve Him only.'"
Jesus taught people to do as he did. So like Jesus, I worship only the true God of heaven and earth, and Jesus taught the right thing when he said these words.
Just as Moses before him. I cannot speak for Christianity as I was raised by God to know the truth. The truth shows that it is in actually knowing God and the scriptures that you know the truth.
Jesus clearly knew both.