Soandso
ᛋᛏᚨᚾᛞ ᛋᚢᚱᛖ
Prove intent. I'm not interested in your opinion.
It's not my job to do your homework for you. If you want to sit with your fingers in your ears, that's on you. The information is out there if you care to look
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Prove intent. I'm not interested in your opinion.
People don't live according to how you think they should live. Unless it personally impacts you why do you care? One of my favorite leftist arguments.Sure, they're free to do this. I don't think anybody is arguing otherwise. They're just throwing red meat to their bigoted citizenry, but I encourage them to let the world know who they are, what they stand for, and what matters to them. It would be nice if they could eventually learn to be civilized, but as long as they remain the way they are, let them wear their virtual white sheets.
Speaking of which, I saw your comment on another thread, "Run Forrest, run." Did you recall that Forrest Gump was named after Nathan Bedford Forrest, the founder of the Klan? It looks like he had a statue that was torn down: Controversial Nathan Bedford Forrest statue torn down off I-65 in Nashville
So you make a claim but I have look for the evidence to prove your claim? It's always the same with you folks isnt it?It's not my job to do your homework for you. If you want to sit with your fingers in your ears, that's on you. The information is out there if you care to look
I couldn't agree more.In the case of the Confederacy, the
war was over preservation of slavery.
This was a travesty that still leaves
open wounds. To celebrate it is
pretty clueless.
They might as well have celebratory
lynchings & slave auctions.
If the British observed slavery inRegarding the Confederacy, that war
over preservation of slavery. This was
a travesty that still leaves open wounds.
To celebrate it is pretty clueless.
They might as well have celebratory
lynchings & slave auctions.
What I find more fascinating is people
celebrating Viking heritage. Raping, murder,
pillaging, robbery, & also slavery. Criminy,
Vikings make Confederates look like saints.
They're proud of this?
If I had any Scandinavian blood, I'd slice
open a finger, & let that blood all run out.
So you make a claim but I have look for thr evidence to prove your claim? It's always the same with you folks isnt it?
No it's not nice but in America people have a right to say things that aren't nice, that offend you and that you would prefer not to hear.
I don't understand this question.If the British observed slavery in
Yankeeland in say 1790 they'd be fully
judtified in waging all out war to the finish?
Look you can be outraged if that makes you feel better. I'm not here to make you happy. You made a claim to know the intent of the people who erected those things and I've asked you to show how you know their intent. You're argument is "timing". Ok. It's evidence it's just not compelling in my opinion.This is not a thread posted on a debate forum, and honestly my time is too valuable to spend on trying to convince someone who ignores very basic history. I'm assuming you're an American
Curious though: what rationale do you have for the fact that the majority of civil war monuments were erected during the Jim Crowe and civil rights era? What's the point of that? Coincidence? Sure, why not
Quite right. The State of Mississippi is free to honour traitors and everyone else is free to shake their heads.People are free to appreciate things you don't like and you're free to whine about it.
Correct and that has been exploited by some people to create an America that I would suggest is as divided now as during the civil war.As much as I dislike the Confederacy, I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. I think this falls under freedom of speech and freedom of expression. I personally don't like to glorify the South, but I don't like glorifying the North either. The fact is, the United States of America has a long, disturbing history of racism and racial injustice against minorities (Native Americans, for instance). Racism against minorities and social injustice didn't just exist in the South.
That's true and it's people with attitudes like yours that have divided America.Quite right. The State of Mississippi is free to honour traitors and everyone else is free to shake their heads.
I don't think the right to say offensive things is being challenged.No it's not nice but in America people have a right to say things that aren't nice, that offend you and that you would prefer not to hear.
Not the treason?That's true and it's people with attitudes like yours that have divided America.
Look you can be outraged if that makes you feel better. I'm not here to make you happy. You made a claim to know the intent of the people who erected those things and I've asked you to show how you know their intent. You're argument is "timing". Ok. It's evidence it's just not compelling in my opinion.
I believe thats precisely what's being challenged here.I don't think the right to say offensive things is being challenged.
It's the wisdom of exalting traitors who fought to keep people
enslaved. Really bad idea.
Why not put up a statue of cops executing civil rights activists, eh.
This would be legal, & would also represent common views.
They could claim that it supports law enforcement.
Some things...some speech....just ought not be done.
Others think it should. That is the issue here.
Ok. It's a weak argument but it is yours. I can respect your pride in it.So "coincidence" it is. Fair enough
Like I said though, it's not my job to do your homework for you. When I was a kid growing up, I learned about how Lincoln the northern aggressor came and attacked the noble people of the confederacy in school. I had to re-educate myself to learn what really happened on my own time. If you care, you can take the effort to do the same
What treason? The treason of leftists dividing America based on race and now gender? If so I agree.Not the treason?
I'm pretty sure it's the treason.
Back in the day: the treason of the Confederates taking up arms against their nation.What treason? The treason of leftists dividing America based on race and now gender? If so I agree.
You think supporting diversity (race, gender) is more divisive than disparaging it and wishing it would all go away? I can tell you, from the perspective of those being thus disparaged, that would be laughable.What treason? The treason of leftists dividing America based on race and now gender? If so I agree.