• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Missouri station offering Russian state radio to listeners

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Missouri station offering Russian state radio to listeners | AP News

LIBERTY, Mo. (AP) — A man who runs a little-known, low-budget radio station in suburban Kansas City says he is standing up for free speech and alternative viewpoints when he airs Russian state-sponsored programming in the midst of the Ukrainian war.

Radio Sputnik, funded by the Russian government, pays broadcast companies in the U.S. to air its programs. Only two do so: One is Peter Schartel’s company in Liberty, Missouri, and one is in Washington, D.C.

Schartel started airing the Russian programming in January 2020, but criticism intensified after Russia invaded Ukraine in February. Schartel said people accuse him and his wife of being traitors to the U.S. and occasionally issue threats. Some critics say he is promoting propaganda and misinformation, but Schartel maintains most people who call to complain haven’t listened to the program.

“Some will talk to me, but others will still call me a piece of whatever,” he said. “What I am thankful for is we are still living in a country where they can call me up. Even if they aren’t thinking about free speech they’re exercising that right.”

Radio Sputnik is produced by the U.S.-based branch of Rossiya Segodnya, a media group operated by the Russian government.

Its content prompted the National Association of Broadcasters to issue an unusual statement on March 1 calling on broadcasters to stop carrying state-sponsored programming with ties to Russia or its agents.

The statement from NAB President and CEO Curtis LeGeyt said the organization is a “fierce defender” of free speech but that given Russia’s unprovoked attack on Ukraine, ”we believe that our nation must stand fully united against misinformation and for freedom and democracy across the globe.”

During one recent broadcast of “The Critical Hour” that aired on Schartel’s KCXL, the hosts and their guests echoed false and unsupported claims about Ukraine’s government. They repeated Russian state media lies about the Russian military’s attacks on civilian targets and its destruction of entire neighborhoods, as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s baseless claim that his enemies in Ukraine are Nazis.

The Kansas City Star said in an editorial that Schartel is putting his financial needs above ethics by spreading Russian propaganda.

“Much like the National Association of Broadcasters, we advise KCXL to drop all programming that paints Putin in a positive light. The Russian president is no victim; he is for sure no war hero,” The Star wrote.

Schartel acknowledged that he initially accepted the Radio Sputnik contract because he was struggling to keep KCXL afloat. The station operates out of a dilapidated, cluttered building. He said he stopped taking a salary months ago, though he does nearly all the work.

Schartel’s Alpine Broadcasting Corp. is paid $5,000 a month to air Radio Sputnik in two three-hour blocks each day, according to a U.S. Justice Department Foreign Agent Registration Act filing in December 2021.

KCXL’s other programming includes shows that are heavily religious, offer opinions across the political spectrum and promote conspiracy theories. One program, TruNews, has been criticized by the Anti-Defamation League for spreading antisemitic, Islamaphobic and anti-LGBTQ messages.

Schartel said he airs programs that are not commercially viable and don’t depend on advertising, which he contends influences news reporting. He said he is promoting free speech by providing a platform for people who otherwise aren’t heard.

Roy Gutterman, director of the Tully Center for Free Speech at Syracuse University, said all radio station owners in the U.S. have a right to air whatever content they want.

“It this station thinks it’s going to make a mark in Missouri by playing Radio Sputnik, they have the right to do so,” Gutterman said.

The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates licensing of radio and television broadcasts, does not censor content unless it intentionally endangers public safety or is found to be obscene, indecent or profane.

Radio Sputnik listeners hear discussions not only about Russia but also current issues in the U.S. and other countries. The theme throughout the broadcast is that U.S. policies intentionally damage the U.S. and other countries while benefiting other corrupt governments, the rich and big business.

The deal that brought Radio Sputnik to the small Missouri station was brokered by RM Broadcasting, based in Florida, which is run by Anthony Ferolito. He signed a similar deal in 2017 with Way Broadcasting, which agreed to lease WZHF-AM’s airtime in Washington, D.C., to RM Broadcasting.

Because of his contracts with Rossiya Segodnya, the Justice Department required Ferolito to register as a foreign government agent in 2018, citing a 1938 law for people lobbying for or acting on behalf of a foreign government. Ferolito lost a lawsuit over the registration.

Ferolito did not return messages from The Associated Press, but RM Broadcasting said in a statement that the company stands with Ukraine and all victims of oppression and aggression. It said RM Broadcasting is dedicated to freedom of speech.

“The public is explicitly notified throughout the broadcast day of the source of the material, so that people can make an informed decision on whether to listen or turn the dial — and that freedom of choice is the ultimate underpinning of our republic,” the statement said.

Gutterman, of Syracuse University, noted that state-produced content from countries not friendly with the U.S., including Russia and China, is already available on some cable stations and online, although some providers have dropped Russian content since the war began.

“Modern media has changed the radio landscape we grew up with,” he said. “Even if stations drop it, people can find this content.”

For his part, Schartel doesn’t think the uproar over the Radio Sputnik broadcasts will last.

Russian state-controlled RT America, the television counterpart to Radio Sputnik, closed its U.S. branch this month and laid off most of its staff. Schartel said that likely means his contract won’t be renewed when it ends in December.

So, my questions to the RF peanut gallery are as follows:

1. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from foreign sources?

2. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country deemed "unfriendly" but not officially at war with? (This would not just apply to Russia, but also China, North Korea, Myanmar, Iran, or any number of other possible countries.)

3. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country against which the U.S. has officially declared war? (Keep in mind the last time Congress actually officially declared war was during WW2.)

4. Does this radio station broadcasting Russian propaganda present a clear and present danger to the American people? (If yes, please explain.)

5. Any other thoughts?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Missouri station offering Russian state radio to listeners | AP News









So, my questions to the RF peanut gallery are as follows:

1. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from foreign sources?

2. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country deemed "unfriendly" but not officially at war with? (This would not just apply to Russia, but also China, North Korea, Myanmar, Iran, or any number of other possible countries.)

3. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country against which the U.S. has officially declared war? (Keep in mind the last time Congress actually officially declared war was during WW2.)

4. Does this radio station broadcasting Russian propaganda present a clear and present danger to the American people? (If yes, please explain.)

5. Any other thoughts?
It's a radio station. It's open information.

Remember GI Joe Hannah?

 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Who cares, Let folks listen to whatever they want. They're grown adults.
 

Vitality

Member
Ha! I live in Kansas City, which is 20 min south of Liberty, and remember hearing about this when he first started airing the program.

Of course it’s not treason. I’ve never listened to the station so I don’t know what propaganda he’s being accused of airing, but I will say I absolutely support his right to air it regardless of content.

Perhaps it’s in bad taste to support programming from a country that has violated the rights of others, but is it treason? No.

I’m rather curious what sort of content the program airs now. Might look it up and give it a listen.

I’d like to mention that Liberty is a very homogeneous (as in white) community. The town is known for their racism (the KKK is prevalent - my boyfriend has told me stories about how they held meetings near his house growing up) and a good majority of folks are the MAGA Trump supporting type. It’s not surprising that so many of those conservatives are voicing their disapproval of something even vaguely linked to communism.
 
Last edited:

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
I’d like to mention that Liberty is a very homogeneous (as in white) community. The town is known for their racism (the KKK is prevalent - my boyfriend has told me stories about how they held meetings near his house growing up) and a good majority of folks are the MAGA Trump supporting type. It’s not surprising that so many of those conservatives are voicing their disapproval of something even vaguely linked to communism.

It's hilariously ironic that many of the MAGA Trump folks complaining about socialist fake news media propaganda may be listening to Russia's state-controlled media right now.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
It's hilariously ironic that many of the MAGA Trump folks complaining about socialist fake news media propaganda may be listening to Russia's state-controlled media right now.
And Western state media is any better? I don't think either are 'pravda'.
 
Last edited:

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
And Western state media is any better? I don't think either are 'pravda'.

The difference is amount of bias. Anyone who has ever studied journalism and news reporting knows that it's extraordinarily difficult to remove all bias. Even in hard news, a single word can be interpreted with bias.

So there are always levels of bias. But even Fox News and CNN, agenda-based they may be, can be read critically in order to get a kernal of "truth."

And, critically, they are not owned by the state (though I recognize there may be lobbying and backdoor deals that take place to ensure a particular message).

That's also not to say that there aren't garbage media sources that are so biased and agenda-driven they may as well be propaganda, but I can turn on the radio and reliably hear something not put out there by the state (barring conclusive evidence of some conspiracy theories).
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Missouri station offering Russian state radio to listeners | AP News









So, my questions to the RF peanut gallery are as follows:

1. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from foreign sources?

2. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country deemed "unfriendly" but not officially at war with? (This would not just apply to Russia, but also China, North Korea, Myanmar, Iran, or any number of other possible countries.)

3. Is it treason for a radio station owner to broadcast news and information from a foreign country against which the U.S. has officially declared war? (Keep in mind the last time Congress actually officially declared war was during WW2.)

4. Does this radio station broadcasting Russian propaganda present a clear and present danger to the American people? (If yes, please explain.)

5. Any other thoughts?
I don't think it is treason necessarily, but I think it illustrates the far right fringe sympathies of American conservatives. I think they have the right to broadcast as long as it is allowed by the broadcasting laws. They have to be licensed to broadcast, so that will be an issue of meeting standards.

Liberty is about 20 miles north of me. It is where Jesse James grew up and lived, and died. Liberty is an independent city just outside of Kansas City, but very rural and conservative. I can see how that area would support right wing content.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
And Western state media is any better? I don't think either are 'pravda'.
If "Western state media" refers to the USA, yes, NPR and PBS are exceptional and well regarded news services. Both have excellent reputations for journalistic ethics, and both offer excellent reporting and interviews with a variety of experts. Globally the BBC offers excellent reporting and analysis, and is available in the USA through NPR.
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
The difference is amount of bias. Anyone who has ever studied journalism and news reporting knows that it's extraordinarily difficult to remove all bias. Even in hard news, a single word can be interpreted with bias.

So there are always levels of bias. But even Fox News and CNN, agenda-based they may be, can be read critically in order to get a kernal of "truth."

And, critically, they are not owned by the state (though I recognize there may be lobbying and backdoor deals that take place to ensure a particular message).

That's also not to say that there aren't garbage media sources that are so biased and agenda-driven they may as well be propaganda, but I can turn on the radio and reliably hear something not put out there by the state (barring conclusive evidence of some conspiracy theories).
I'm more thinking BBC as I'm British.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Going forward, how about we dismiss outright any observations or criticisms you make, no matter how valid or well supported, as "Biden Derangement Syndrome" or "OCT Derangement Syndrome"? Cool? Cool.

I think if you value critical thinking, you can't really say that's an apples to apples comparison.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Going forward, how about we dismiss outright any observations or criticisms you make, no matter how valid or well supported, as "Biden Derangement Syndrome" or "OCT Derangement Syndrome"? Cool? Cool.
I call it as I see it. The infatuation with Trump here far outweighs my criticism by miles and dwarfs my post counts to the contrary.

Poor people... many tortured souls here.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I don't think it is treason necessarily, but I think it illustrates the far right fringe sympathies of American conservatives.
Why can't it illustrate desire to understand the Russian
perspective? I consume news that I know has propaganda
(that I disagree with) because it illuminates why others
think as they do, eg, OAN. To know what Putin's government
tells Russians would be interesting.
 
Top