• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Modern Science proves the Authenticity of the Glorious Qur'an

McBell

McBell

Unbound
Fatihah said:
Response: The question was answered. Why don't you know what you just denied? Don't tell me you have lost track of what you just said.
Click to expand...
Liar.
You did not answer the question.

No, instead you started this nonsense of not answering.
Is it because you lost track of the conversation?
Perhaps you can prove me wrong and simply answer the question instead of your trying your childish merry-go-round games?
 
The Voice of Reason

The Voice of Reason

Doctor of Thinkology
This thread, and the other two like it, really should be closed down.

There is simply no resolution, since the Islamists are simply going to play grade school games of denial with anything presented to them.

There is just no end to this.
 
F

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
painted wolf said:
[/B]Here you claim that Isostacy was revealed int eh Qur'an. I added bold and underline so you could see it.

Response: I said the "science" is in the qur'an, not "isostasy". Isostasy is the term that scientists call this particular science. Allah does not call it isostasy and did not reveal it as such.

Quote: painted wolf
And no... mountains to do not: "prevent some of the quakes in the earth".
If they did, then they wouldn't be found in places with the highest number of "quakes of the earth".

Response: What does having earthquakes near mountains have to do with mountains preventing the earth from shaking?
Click to expand...
 
McBell

McBell

Unbound
The Voice of Reason said:
This thread, and the other two like it, really should be closed down.

There is simply no resolution, since the Islamists are simply going to play grade school games of denial with anything presented to them.

There is just no end to this.
Click to expand...
eek2.gif

What?!
Close the thread?!
Then what am I to do when I get bored?
 
F

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
Mestemia said:
Liar.
You did not answer the question.

Response: Now you're lying because I have. That would make you a hypocrite as well.

Quote: mestemia
No, instead you started this nonsense of not answering.
Is it because you lost track of the conversation?
Perhaps you can prove me wrong and simply answer the question instead of your trying your childish merry-go-round games?

Response: Clearly you have lost track. Otherwise, you would have answered the question.
Click to expand...
 
F

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
The Voice of Reason said:
This thread, and the other two like it, really should be closed down.

There is simply no resolution, since the Islamists are simply going to play grade school games of denial with anything presented to them.

There is just no end to this.
Click to expand...

Response: The pot calls the kettle black.
 
painted wolf

painted wolf

Grey Muzzle
Response: I said the "science" is in the qur'an, not "isostasy". Isostasy is the term that scientists call this particular science. Allah does not call it isostasy and did not reveal it as such.
Click to expand...
Do you realize how desperate to be right that sounds?

Response: What does having earthquakes near mountains have to do with mountains preventing the earth from shaking?
Click to expand...
If mountains prevent earth shaking... then one would expect more earth shaking where there are no mountains.... In reality it is quite the opposite.

wa:do
 
T

themadhair

Well-Known Member
Fatihah said:
Response: You just said: "You presented an example of [SIZE=+1]isostasy[/SIZE] to argue that mountains stabilise the earth for the purpose of proving that mountains prevent shaking."
…
Not [size=+1]isostasy[/size] as you just accused me of but what?:
"mountains stabilise the earth for the purpose of proving that mountains prevent shaking"
Click to expand...
You appear to have a reading comprehension problem so I have reddened the relevant portion. You presented isostasy in order to argue that mountains stabilise the earth for the purpose of proving that mountains prevent shaking. You brought isostasy into the equation simply because you, in you pit of ignorance, thought it helped your argument. When it didn’t, and you were criticised for your use of isostasy you then attempted to claim that you didn’t. Which is quite sad really since I could post a screenshot of painted wolf’s comment where she quoted your used of the word isostasy.

I put isostasy in red since you appeared to have difficulty seeing it.


Response: After using the word, "definitional equivalent", you just said:"please do not tell me that you have language difficulties also"

Yet I'm the one with language difficulties? It doesn't get no better than this.
Click to expand...
What is wrong with the phrase definitional equivalent?

From Answers.com - Online Dictionary, Encyclopedia and much more
Defintional: A statement of the meaning of a word, phrase, or term, as in a dictionary entry.
Equivalent: Equal, as in value, force, or meaning.

Putting the two together we learn that the phrase ‘definitional equivalent’ means that the reason two words and/or concepts are equivalent is because one is defined as being the other.

How pathetic is it when I have to quote the dictionary to you in order for you to understand a phase? Admittedly the phrase is more commonly used in mathematics or logic, but most people would simply declare they don’t know its meaning rather than embarrass themselves in the way you have.
 
Last edited:
McBell

McBell

Unbound
Fatihah said:
Response: Now you're lying because I have. That would make you a hypocrite as well.
Click to expand...
post number please.

Fatihah said:
Response: Clearly you have lost track. Otherwise, you would have answered the question.
Click to expand...
I will with hold my response until after you present the post number for the post where you answered the question:
What truth are you claiming I deny?
​
 
S

Sententia

Well-Known Member
No one proved your book or any other book. You believe despite that and thats why they call it faith.

To lie and and blather on nonsensically must be embarrassing. Its not as if the claims are even really any different or any more valid then they ever have been.

In short I agree with Seyorni.

Seyorni said:
Drivel
Click to expand...

Amen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top