Ohhh go on, he could use all the help he can get.
-Q
Response: No help needed.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ohhh go on, he could use all the help he can get.
-Q
She means what version of isostacy are you subscribing to?Response: What do you mean by "what model"?
Your using the word "buoy" as a noun in your argument, which makes no sense. It's a verb. Buoyancy means "to keep afloat". How on earth can you move up and down a "to keep a float". It doesn't make sense. You can't move a verb. A verb describes movement.
Response: No help needed.
Oddly, I would have thought you would known about the differing models of isostasy. Oh well.
Fatihah, try to keep up.Your using the word "buoy" as a noun in your argument, which makes no sense. It's a verb. Buoyancy means "to keep afloat". How on earth can you move up and down a "to keep a float". It doesn't make sense. You can't move a verb. A verb describes movement.
Haha. BUSTED!I know you well enough, Ymir. This post HAS to be tongue-in-cheek.
Yes. I am in denial... Lord knows over what, but I am in denial. :yes:Response: Still in denial?
Mr Spinkles said:For example, in your first paragraph you say "the larger plate is pushed downward and the smaller is pushed upward as the principle of isostacy clearly states". No, it doesn't state that. I don't know what principle that is that you described, but it is not isostacy.
No there's nothing about "the larger plate is pushed downward and the smaller is pushed upward" in post #509, sorry.Fatihah said:Response: That's a statement. Where's the proof? Isostasy does say this, as I have provided proof for and is clearly shown in post 509.
I have already answered this several times. No point repeating myself.Fatihah said:My simple question is this, are you telling me that this statement that clearly says that mountains balance the earth's surface is not actual proof that mountains balance the earth's surface? Yes or No?
If you had looked at the article on isostacy from your own source (Wikipedia) you would know. (here it is by the way Isostasy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ). Honestly, how can you argue about something you know nothing about?Response: What do you mean by "what model"?
No there's nothing about "the larger plate is pushed downward and the smaller is pushed upward" in post #509, sorry.
Response: Denial is always another option.
As you always demonstrate. It is like your 'fifth' as it were.Response: Denial is always another option.
If you had looked at the article on isostacy from your own source (Wikipedia) you would know. (here it is by the way Isostasy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ). Honestly, how can you argue about something you know nothing about?
Okay. Thanks for the discussion I think we've both had our say.Response: You should be asking yourself the same question.