Katzpur
Not your average Mormon
If that is not the biggest lie I have ever seen posted on this forum, I don't know what is.I am not bias against the LDS.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If that is not the biggest lie I have ever seen posted on this forum, I don't know what is.I am not bias against the LDS.
If that is not the biggest lie I have ever seen posted on this forum, I don't know what is.
This has been a very big issue recently among LDS circles.
That's your standard charge -- one you've made in post after post after post on this board. If it's not your own opinion, it's biased.
Then perhaps you could prove me wrong? But you may excuse me if I don't get my hopes up when the thread is started with the words "criminal and misogynist".
Total BS.I am bias against Joseph Smith. The LDS believers are merely victims.
Unless it is affecting you personally like...
-Your wife wants a divorce over differences in religion
- Proselytisers hassle you
- a family member like a cousin of brother wants to preach at you every time you meet
I really can't understand why anyone would bother about what happens in some other religion, as long as its not crimes against humanity, in which I think we all need to take a stance, after due thought and reflection.
I admit to occasionally seeing something in another religion that bothers me and expressing it ... too spontaneous of a reaction. Bit as long as that's not in MY religion or my interpretation of it, what's the point?
Apex, you are 100% correct in what you are saying. Sunstone, you are 100% wrong. For starters, what on earth does the OP's personal opinion of Joseph Smith have to do with the excommunication of a woman from the LDS Church in 2014? THe OP was deliberately inflammatory. It makes me wonder whether we're supposed to be debating the appropriateness of the excommunication or Joseph Smith's character.
Total BS.
Speaking as someone who's heavily invoved in STEM education (including getting girls excited about science and engineering), I tend to bristle whenever we as a society tell kids that certain things they're passionate about are off-limits... especially when it involves denying opportunities to girls and women.
My issues with the LDS Church aside, why should it be any less of an issue for me when a woman feels called to a Mormon priesthood but is not allowed to follow through than when another woman feels called to be a microbiologist but isn't allowed to follow through on that?
I spend quite a bit of my volunteer life trying to encourage kids to pursue whatever they feel passionate about. Why should I not do this if a kid's passion happens to be religious? What should I say to them? "Sorry, but I only want your life to be fulfilling if you want to do something secular"?
I know nothing of LDS history.It has to do with the fact that Smith was a mysoginist, and these views have prevailed in the LDS culminating in this article.
You make good points, but generally there is difference between religions and secular life. I was a counsellor as well, and I can't recall discussing religion at all. But you'll be happy to know my daughter is an electrician. I taught several girls over the years that went on to male dominated jobs. One is a pilot.
Have you had kids ask you why STEM isn't expanded to include religion.
I know nothing of LDS history.
Why was he a mysogynist?
Smith created an ingenious system of oppression, in which opposition towards men is tantamount to arguing with God. This is still obvious today as the LDS accused the excommunicated woman of Apostasy.
It's also evident in their version of the afterlife: a woman may only enter by her husband and will spend her godhood pumping out heavenly babies.
Absolutely false.It's also evident in their version of the afterlife: a woman may only enter by her husband and will spend her godhood pumping out heavenly babies.
According to LDS doctrine, a single man may progress no further in Heaven than a single woman.A mechanism to ensure that women of the LDS have to marry and encourages polygamic (and not even polyamorous) behaviour.
According to LDS doctrine, a single man may progress no further in Heaven than a single woman.
That is such a load of crap, I can't even believe it. The LDS hierarchy does not looking kindly on dissenting opinions when it comes to matters of Church policy, but a dissenting woman would be treated no differently at all than a dissenting man.It has to do with the fact that Smith was a mysoginist, and these views have prevailed in the LDS culminating in this article.
I'm not following how these two issues are related, but my statement is accurate. Mormons believe that the greatest blessings in Heaven are reserved for married couples. Now argue that that's not fair, if you want, but it's absolutely false to say that a woman can't get into Heaven without her husband's permission.That is rather interesting, I didn't know that. I guess that goes without saying since only males get the priesthoods.
Absolutely false.