Kathryn
It was on fire when I laid down on it.
No, your sensitivity argument applies to both. It just sounds retarded when put in perspective. The proposed site isn't even on ground zero, that's just a phrase coined by the republicans to give the connotation of minarets rising from base of the WTC itself. Will your sensitivity soon extend over a ten mile radius? The city itself?
No one is banning him from speaking are they? So what if they protest they're not trying to shut down his speech and cart him off to jail. You don't think every time anything associated with Islam is constructed someone doesn't protest?
I am going to reiterate something that you already know - but for some reason don't think is worth taking into consideration:
The building is 600 ft from Ground Zero. It is so close that the landing gear from one of the planes which struck the WTC went through it's roof that day. It was covered in the ashes of 3000 people who were killed.
How close would be too close in your opinion?
As for the comparison to the brouhaha surrounding Beck's rally - my comparison is this:
Those who are questioning or protesting his sensitivity (the anniversary of King's speech), his location (the Lincoln Memorial) and/or his motives (political? religious? racist?) are typically the same people who fling the "Bigot!" judgment at those who question the sensitivity, location and/or motives of the Cordoba Group/Park 51 imam.
I believe that's an ironic and hypocritical position.