Most Accurate News Source

[ElishaElijah]

You got it wrong. The Steele Dossier was based on hearsay info from some Russian amd Dutch sources, which is what Steele referred to it as being unverified. The irony is that it was the Pubs that had primary interest in it but backed out after Trump got the GOP nomination.

Again, Mueller did not pursue that as he said, thus you don't know what you're talking about. We do know with certainly that there was some collusion with some in Trump's staff, but whether Trump himself was directly involved is either unclear or that the fact that he could not be prosecuted on this being he was president.

It certainly wasn't Fox if that's what you're implying, and anyone who uses Fox as their only or main news source is not being very intelligent as it was created by Murdock to "reflect conservative values", and we certainly are seeing that in spades right now as it is unabashedly the "Trump News Channel". And this is not the only country Murdock's "yellow journalism" shows, btw.

I didn’t mention any news source, who got it right?
*What about Trump and the Charlottesville speech?
Which news source reported that accurately?
*The Covington kids with the MAGA hats?
*Hunter Biden and his laptop?

What news source reports these stories in a way that portrays the full story instead of partial information?

 

[ElishaElijah]

Let’s take Nick Sandman:
BBC reports US teen denies mocking Native American
In my opinion a balanced view of the story.
Then we have the CNN Defamation lawsuit and who reported on that once we got to the truth? Not many

 

[sayak83]

Would be great to find some accurate news and science sources that everyone could agree on. This is the reason for this thread. For example All Sides has a chart and specifically says it’s by perspective or other sites say it’s by trust. I still wouldn’t say these are accurate assessments of a news source. I would rather have accurate and not biased.

A free and reasonably informative source of science news.
https://phys.org/
As a scientist, I have been using it over the last two years and have found it useful.

 

[Mock Turtle]

I would add to the above - if not already cited:

ScienceAlert: The Best in Science News and Amazing Breakthroughs
Scientific American: Science News, Expert Analysis, Health Research - Scientific American
Ars Technica

 

[metis]

I didn’t mention any news source, who got it right?
*What about Trump and the Charlottesville speech?
Which news source reported that accurately?
*The Covington kids with the MAGA hats?
*Hunter Biden and his laptop?

What news source reports these stories in a way that portrays the full story instead of partial information?

And you watch all these other networks, right?

As you've repeatedly shown us, you are heavy into "alternative facts", plus you can't even keep your lies straight. Earlier in the week you say you don't support Trump, but it didn't take long before you showed again that you do. Knowing you as we do, you'll probably deny this again.

I showed you the research done by PolitiFact on the cable-news networks, you claim it's biased, and yet you continue to not provide a single source for your claim, nor will even admit you undoubtedly made it up.

The bottom line: You simply cannot be trusted to tell the Truth.

 

[ElishaElijah]

And you watch all these other networks, right?

As you've repeatedly shown us, you are heavy into "alternative facts", plus you can't even keep your lies straight. Earlier in the week you say you don't support Trump, but it didn't take long before you showed again that you do. Knowing you as we do, you'll probably deny this again.

I showed you the research done by PolitiFact on the cable-news networks, you claim it's biased, and yet you continue to not provide a single source for your claim, nor will even admit you undoubtedly made it up.

The bottom line: You simply cannot be trusted to tell the Truth.

I just said BBC had a balanced story on the example, CNN and others didn’t seem to bother with the whole story in the Nick Sandman example, plus the story was all over Facebook, I have liberal friends to this day still have the original false account on their page. This type of news reporting should be cleaned up and when the truth comes out they all should post the truth on this but they don’t.
All your other input is really off point, argumentative, unproductive and divisive.

 

[metis]

All your other input is really off point, argumentative, unproductive and divisive.

If you'd simply told the truth and stop using stereotyping, you wouldn't have a problem with me getting on your case. Instead, and let me repeat this, you simply lie and lie again, thus I'm not the one who's the culprit.

Tell the Truth-- is that so hard for you to do? If it is, then at least try and have the basic decency of not blaming others for your own shortcomings.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Earlier in the week you say you don't support Trump,

It depends, it’s more like I support ideas and principles no matter who they are from and base those ideas and principles on Scripture.

 

[Revoltingest]

The "most accurate news source" could be a misleading
goal. I've recently seen claims that Biden's infrastructure
bill would prohibit any money used in our ports being used
to automate anything. Alas, I've not been able to find any
confirmation of this from left leaning sources. Union contracts
make CA ports unusual in not running 24-7. Also, CA is not
trucker friendly, with various regulations that differ from other
states, & attempts to treat contractors as employees.
Is it factual?
Or are leftish sources so pro-union that they wouldn't cover
this issue?
I've found that accuracy is more than just being correct
about what's said. It's also about what's not said. So it's
good to survey sources of various agendas....& to wonder
just what's accurate & what isn't.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Instead, and let me repeat this, you simply lie and lie again, thus I'm not the one who's the culprit.

You will have to show the lie you’re accusing me of so I can repent and fix that. If you can’t then you’re bearing false witness and slandering me.

 

[metis]

You will have to show the lie you’re accusing me of so I can repent and fix that. If you can’t then you’re bearing false witness and slandering me.

I'm not going all the way back there, especially since I'm not at all optismistic that you'll not just slip back into same 'ole same 'ole mode. Some things are just simply a waste of time and effort, so now you can just portray this in any way you want.

Bye for now.

 

[ElishaElijah]

I'm not going all the way back there, especially since I'm not at all optismistic that you'll not just slip back into same 'ole same 'ole mode. Some things are just simply a waste of time and effort, so now you can just portray this in any way you want.

Bye for now.

Remove your comment or I will report it for breaking the forum rules.

 

[metis]

Remove your comment or I will report it for breaking the forum rules.

Be my guest, but that won't change what you've done.

 

[ElishaElijah]

Be my guest, but that won't change what you've done.

I don’t have a problem speaking the Truth, which is what I do, you haven’t shown otherwise so you should remove your comment or provide your proof.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You will have to show the lie you’re accusing me of so I can repent and fix that. If you can’t then you’re bearing false witness and slandering me.

His refusal to help you understand does not mean that he is wrong. Do you understand that?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don’t have a problem speaking the Truth, which is what I do, you haven’t shown otherwise so you should remove your comment or provide your proof.

Speaking one's beliefs is not the same as speaking the truth. You may not have lied, which would be deliberately trying to mislead someone, but many of your posts have had false claims in them.

 

[metis]

His refusal to help you understand does not mean that he is wrong. Do you understand that?

Thanks, but let me just say that I did point out what he had done and I also repeated it. Thus, after numerous ignored requests, he comes back with his threat.

 

[Revoltingest]

I don’t have a problem speaking the Truth, which is what I do, you haven’t shown otherwise so you should remove your comment or provide your proof.

I've found that some posters aren't
amenable to resolving personal conflicts.
Tis best to disengage.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Let's try to get this back on track. One problem with networks is separating news from commentary. The news from a network may be trustworthy, but the commentary may not be. FOX News was quite
reliable for news at least until there honest anchors could not take it any longer and resigned. CNN is fine, if you avoid listening to too much of their commentary.

 

[metis]

Let's try to get this back on track. One problem with networks is separating news from commentary. The news from a network may be trustworthy, but the commentary may not be. FOX News was quite
reliable for news at least until there honest anchors could not take it any longer and resigned. CNN is fine, if you avoid listening to too much of their commentary.

Exactly and well said.

"Accuracy" and "bias" are not synonymous terms, thus CNN has been shown to be the 2nd most accurate news channel but it is also quite biased.