Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because a lot of people don't have families they are responsible for. That applies to almost all the young men that get involved in terrorism for example.Why can that not be?
Why can that not be?
You would think but then again..Why can that not be?
I think because without God it becomes generally impossible.Why can that not be?
I think because without God it becomes generally impossible.
When you are raised in a culture of "It is normal to have another woman when you are married" and you have no God in your life to say "It is a violation of covenant", it is hard to raise a family in peace.
That same principle can be applied in dozens of other areas that can rob peace in a family.
No God help, by and large, no peace.
I say generally because there are exceptions where a family may have no God but there is enough God around them to still have peace in the family. As Ambassadors for Christ say, "He rains on the just and the unjust".
Your belief is generally not borne out by the evidence. The notion that without theism we all become amoral, violent hedonists is simply untrue.
Why can that not be?
What does "generally" mean to you?
and/or "enough God around them"?
As long as they believe in your particular religion of course.I think because without God it becomes generally impossible.
When you are raised in a culture of "It is normal to have another woman when you are married" and you have no God in your life to say "It is a violation of covenant", it is hard to raise a family in peace.
That same principle can be applied in dozens of other areas that can rob peace in a family.
No God help, by and large, no peace.
I say generally because there are exceptions where a family may have no God but there is enough God around them to still have peace in the family. As Ambassadors for Christ say, "He rains on the just and the unjust".
1) It was a viewpoint - you don't have to subscribe to it.Non-anecdotally. Ie in scientific studies of the subject. There's no evidence on any large scale that theists are less violent than atheists. Unless you have some to present?
How would this be measured, precisely? Perhaps theists are peaceful because they have enough secularism around them? See the problem yet?
nope.As long as they believe in your particular religion of course.
1) It was a viewpoint - you don't have to subscribe to it.
2) "Generally" means that if you don't have a God, god or gods, it doesn't mean that you are evil
3) "Enough God around you" - means that the influence of God is strong enough in your life to make a difference.
So... now that your pre-conceived reading has been addressed...
can we be friends now?
Your belief is generally not borne out by the evidence. The notion that without theism we all become amoral, violent hedonists is simply untrue.
It's an age-old misconception that can't seem to run its course. Certainly, they can, but it's not the same obviously.
It's a simple idea that having God commits one to a variety of things, that is unmatched in the nontheistic world.
It's an age-old misconception that can't seem to run its course. Certainly, they can, but it's not the same obviously.
It's a simple idea that having God commits one to a variety of things, that is unmatched in the nontheistic world.
The idea is certainly simple, just not one that's evidence-based. If it were, we'd see widespread differences in levels of violence committed by theists vs. nontheists. But we don't.
Your belief is generally not borne out by the evidence.
Non-anecdotally. Ie in scientific studies of the subject. There's no evidence on any large scale that theists are less violent than atheists. Unless you have some to present?
How would this be measured, precisely? Perhaps theists are peaceful because they have enough secularism around them? See the problem yet?