I am afraid Gilligan's Island is too small for the unvaccinated Republicans,
You don’t have to be a Republican to be unvaccinated.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am afraid Gilligan's Island is too small for the unvaccinated Republicans,
Well, statistics are overwhelming by far the majority of the unvaccinated are Republicans and Indepenants on the Conservative Right.
..but it helps.....to judge by the data in post 33.You don’t have to be a Republican to be unvaccinated.
Actually you could do the search for your self, but nonetheless . . .
That doesn't invalidate that there are many we don't know about. Unvaccinated doesn't equal republican.
People choose to do whatever without needing to be affiliated with a political party.
This does not make sense. No one ever said the number of unvaccinated equals Republicans. The statistics are valid including antivaxer groups like QAnon widely supported by Republicans. There is alao a history od open opposition by Republicans in the South and Midwest to the vaccines, and many do not believe the pandemic was ever truly a pandemic. Trump supported the dangerous notion that only 6% of the deaths recorded by Covid-19 were truely Covid-19 cases.
This is meaningless and does not make sense either.
You proved my point. Are there statistics saying democrats support being unvaccinated?
First, neither your post and the previous posr do not make sense. There is no such support for your assertions in the references. You have not provided any references to support your case.
No, the reference demonstrated that only 4% of Democrats refused to be vaccinated. The percentage of evangelical Christians and Republicans are much higher. The Democratic Party overwnelmingly support vaccination. The Republican PArty offers no such support in the history of the pandemic.
Doesn't the bar chart in post 33 answer this?I was asking you questions.
I meant to Ask are there democrats that support vaccination? Provaxxers
Are there repuboicans that support nonvacination? Antivaxxers
Doesn't the bar chart in post 33 answer this?
Or do you mean something else?
Not staying long enough to read what has already been posted may be one reason you get attacked.I'd have to look. I usually don't stay long in these posts. I get attacked often.
Not staying long enough to read what has already been posted may be one reason you get attacked.
Not staying long enough to read what has already been posted may be one reason you get attacked.
Just do me a favour and read post 33 and see if it answers your question. If it doesn't, that's OK, then we can see what it is you need answered.That's another way to see it negatively. No. It depends on the topic itself. Other topics is fine.
No need to put the blame on me. Just some people's personalities (where they from, experiences, tolerance, etc) varies. No one shoe fits all. No one's to blame.
No but it was referred to in @shunyadragon's reply to you. So you were being told the answer was there - at least, as he understood your question.33 wasn't addressed to me. I don't read every single thread post.
No but it was referred to in @shunyadragon's reply to you. So you were being told the answer was there - at least, as he understood your question.
Can you read a bar chart?I didn't see the cross reference. I don't care for "scripture-replies" and guessing why people quote a chart, scripture, or dictionary without commentary. Guessing leads to more probsblems than just saying what you mean and be open to explain it when asked.
Can you read a bar chart?
Does post 33 answer your question or not?Why are you making this into an argument?
It is highly unnecessary.
Does post 33 answer your question or not?