Mother Nature vs. God?

[tumbleweed41]

Such as insisting on multiple dimensions to explain the one you're in.

Believe in this you can't see?....things you can't prove?

Got faith?

I tend to believe what the evidence points toward.

Say again?

I tend to believe what the evidence points toward.

Got it?

 

[McBell]

Which of course is incompatible to the scientific reasoning that Mother Nature has a serious gambling problem.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[PolyHedral]

Seen it.

Garett is basing his hypothesis on as of yet unproven and unverified speculation. His E8 (Theory of Everything) preprint paper has yet to be submitted for peer-review, although he has made it available to popular media since 2008.

This is not to say he is wrong, it is that he has yet to provide any quantification for his work.
The vast majority of physicist say his "theory", and related models, do not work.
Time will tell.

Awww, I liked the idea of E8. It seemed so elegant.

 

[Thief]

I tend to believe what the evidence points toward.

Got it?

So reality is no more than you can perceive?....the evidence.

Waiting for that photograph...that fingerprint.

And yet, at any other time, you would be willing to quote science and it's unproven theories as fact.

Crossing lines as you please?

 

[tumbleweed41]

I tend to believe what the evidence points toward.

Got it?

So reality is no more than you can perceive?....the evidence.

Waiting for that photograph...that fingerprint.

And yet, at any other time, you would be willing to quote science and it's unproven theories as fact.

Crossing lines as you please?

What "unproven theories"?

 

[Yerda]

I don’t think it will Jaiket. As I have tried to point out, scientists already have these degrees and do not know.

We only know this because they (the scientists) have done the work, interpreted the data, and published volumes of analyses.

There is no better or higher educated claims to “I don’t know” there exists only possibilities.

I can think of no grounds justifying this presumption. Can you explain?

Intelligent design is one avenue that I believe is not fully realized or understood.

Perhaps because it is generally incoherent, and not formulated in a testable manner.

 

[Thief]

What "unproven theories"?

Apparently you can't keep up.
How about backing up to a more focused question.

 

[tumbleweed41]

So reality is no more than you can perceive?....the evidence.

Waiting for that photograph...that fingerprint.

And yet, at any other time, you would be willing to quote science and it's unproven theories as fact.

Crossing lines as you please?

What "unproven theories"?

Apparently you can't keep up.
How about backing up to a more focused question.

What "unproven theories"?

 

[McBell]

Apparently you can't keep up.
How about backing up to a more focused question.

Is it that he cannot keep up or is it that you have backed yourself into a corner?

Based on what is posted in this thread, I say it is the latter.

 

[Thief]

Is it that he cannot keep up or is it that you have backed yourself into a corner?

Based on what is posted in this thread, I say it is the latter.

And you have the ability to describe that corner?

I doubt it.

 

[McBell]

And you have the ability to describe that corner?

I doubt it.

To what end?

Or is this another diversion tactic to help you get out of your corner?

 

[Thief]

To what end?

Or is this another diversion tactic to help you get out of your corner?

Back to empty retort.
It seems all you can do.

 

[Gunfingers]

I love when creationists start repeating themselves, and then accuse us of using the same tired arguments when we tell them why they're still wrong.

 

[Thief]

I love when creationists start repeating themselves, and then accuse us of using the same tired arguments when we tell them why they're still wrong.

Who?...me?

I'm not a creationist.
Evolution is real enough.

So is God.

 

[Android]

Evolution is real enough.

So is God.

What's your definition of "real"?

 

[Gunfingers]

Who?...me?

I'm not a creationist.
Evolution is real enough.

So is God.

Sorry, so many people, it's hard to keep everyone straight. You're the one that is trying to get us all to believe in god because we can't disprove its existence, right?

 

[Thief]

Sorry, so many people, it's hard to keep everyone straight. You're the one that is trying to get us all to believe in god because we can't disprove its existence, right?

Nope.

 

[tumbleweed41]

I tend to believe what the evidence points toward.

Got it?

So reality is no more than you can perceive?....the evidence.

Waiting for that photograph...that fingerprint.

And yet, at any other time, you would be willing to quote science and it's unproven theories as fact.

Crossing lines as you please?

What "unproven theories"?

Apparently you can't keep up.
How about backing up to a more focused question.

What "unproven theories"?

What "unproven theories"?

 

[McBell]

Back to empty retort.
It seems all you can do.

It is not my fault that you are scared to actually engage in discussion.

 

[Thief]

It is not my fault that you are scared to actually engage in discussion.

So say something intelligent.