McBell
Unbound
Your skill at denial is noteworthy.
However, it is still denial.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Mother Nature vs. God?
- Thread starter Anonymouse
- Start date
- Status
However, it is still denial.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
McBell
Unbound
What "unproven theories"?
Nice try, but you have been asked repeatedly to support your claim and have gone to great lengths to avoid it.
What "unproven theories"?
Still in denial?
Or do you think your blatant avoidance of the direct question: ""What "unproven theories"?"" some how helps your argument?
Stop acting like someone who is desperately seeking a way out of the corner they backed themselves into and answer the question.
Last edited by a moderator:
Orias
Left Hand Path
Coming from a highly prominent scientist :foot:
Heh, well isn't that what Nature really is?
Funny...the English language essentially uses the term "nature" to define our innate disposition and birth, as well as to possess creative power in the material world.
So lets review, what has man created?
Nature is actually the Egyptian word, "Neter" (deity), which can be fundamentally understood as the order of the Universe and or what most conceive of as being "divine" or "God/Godlike".
I've been One to say, talk of "God" is belief of "God". Anyone can play word games with this, but few take it for what it is.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
And your intelligent opinion about the topic is what?
tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Pick one to support your view on this topic.
tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
Sorry, you accused me personally of...
I ask again.
What unproven theories?
McBell
Unbound
Your blatant avoidance and flamboyant denial is most annoying.
Not the least bit suprising, but annoying non the less.
So, what "unproven theories" are you talking about?
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Back to topic .....anyone?....
So God is working with a test tube...Earth...that must be continually stirred.
The continual churning of chemistry creates random events.
earth quakes, tornadoes, hurricanes......
The life in the test tube must have some of that ability to be random.
Without the 'random'....the life would require exacting conditions....
no 'flex'.
The design of the life needs to be random...flexible.
So God is working with a test tube...Earth...that must be continually stirred.
The continual churning of chemistry creates random events.
earth quakes, tornadoes, hurricanes......
The life in the test tube must have some of that ability to be random.
Without the 'random'....the life would require exacting conditions....
no 'flex'.
The design of the life needs to be random...flexible.
Last edited:
tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
The topic is Mother Nature vs. God.
In the course of the discussion you made the following statement....
Are you willing to follow up that statement by answering the question "what unproven theories"?
Or will you continue to avoid the question?
Orias
Left Hand Path
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Actually....
We've had this discussion at great length under another thread.
The word theory is almost self explanatory.
What you are witnessing is the objection to theory as an argument against faith.
Theory cannot trump faith.
And theories are by nature unproven...hence the word theory.
So...shall we proceed with this discussion about ....faith....
which requires no proving?
McBell
Unbound
Since I am fairly certain you will Humpty Dumpty the definition:
theory
n 1: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the
natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge
that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a
specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate
facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and
theory"
2: a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that
is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain
facts or phenomena;
n 1: a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the
natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge
that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a
specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate
facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and
theory"
2: a tentative theory about the natural world; a concept that
is not yet verified but that if true would explain certain
facts or phenomena;
Why not just be direct and flat out state that we witnessing your desperation?
Maybe not for you.
But for those who prefer truth and facts, it most certainly does.
And what do you set out to "prove"?
I have grown past your wishful thinking and fairy tales.
And don't bother threatening with your god.
I am even less impressed with him.
Which is why you much prefer faith over truth and facts.
Discarding truth and facts allows you to believe whatever fool notion enters into that brain of yours.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
And you think a religious discussion is about me?
Go look in the mirror and call yourself an accident.
That might work for you.
Doesn't work for believers.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
FlyingTeaPot
Irrational Rationalist. Educated Fool.
Jordan Robert Wilson
Atheist
.....Really? No, no, you're joking, right? Look it up.
- Status