rational experiences
Veteran Member
In ancient law courts trials existed.
You had to confess to the holy judge a father of all abstinence.
Title holy father. Law said it was a criminals confession. Under the term Phi David causes life's confessions. Changed behaviours.
You were forgiven by crime defined but then did penance.
Penance to accept the burden of your brother's crimes. Scientist who changed your spiritual behaviour. Criminal first holy father advised. Do penance was considered by the type of crime.
As choice was still involved free will.
Publicly flogged or stoned was the criminal.
Man of god was publicly flogged as he avowed truth of illegal sins of the scientist. Corruption was real. Times governing changed.
Absolution meant you were falsely accused and innocent.
Once a long time ago first law courts were in judgements. Then it Changed.
As law department branch separated as judges began to be bribed.
So the rapist was once stoned to death as they were the adulterer of another man's wife. Wife being in law sister first is holy virgin. Holy mother second. Holy daughter. Titles of innocence.
Stated a sister and mother were by title allowed sex in marriage as adults. Adultress in human law female who was an adult allowed to let her hair tresses down and be seen as the hair had been covered before marriage. Had sex. Deemed Lawful.
Wearing head scarves innocent virgins notated in society...no touching allowed.
Why changed reading proves itself wrong as in society rape was never ever accepted.
Were chosen to be in a marriage. With equal a brother man. Not a father.
If a father took a daughter he was considered adult hence adulterer. Only a holy father could pass that edict upon another father. Daughter was not an adult.
Reasoned all daughters were innocent. As men kept them safe.
The law of court Romes jurisdiction would see any man from any country caught accused. As they were considered the high court.
Three the holy Trinity was a human Iaw. Human laws original protection as protector. Stated as men's raping behaviour was out of control in the past.
Muslims had accepted the Jesus verdict Trinity once. Why the laws are said in their papers.
Changed by cause of society and rich men. Then irradiation dementia. Misread and totally misquoted today.
Adulterer rapist men were stoned to death. It was never the victims fault.
A woman as a daughter cannot be the adulterer. Said the holy father.
Adult meant knowledge of the act of sex. In marriage adult sex was consensual.
An adulterer was who forced sex onto another. Adult to adult.
Only a man could rape a woman said father. No argument as it's old laws discussed.
You had to confess to the holy judge a father of all abstinence.
Title holy father. Law said it was a criminals confession. Under the term Phi David causes life's confessions. Changed behaviours.
You were forgiven by crime defined but then did penance.
Penance to accept the burden of your brother's crimes. Scientist who changed your spiritual behaviour. Criminal first holy father advised. Do penance was considered by the type of crime.
As choice was still involved free will.
Publicly flogged or stoned was the criminal.
Man of god was publicly flogged as he avowed truth of illegal sins of the scientist. Corruption was real. Times governing changed.
Absolution meant you were falsely accused and innocent.
Once a long time ago first law courts were in judgements. Then it Changed.
As law department branch separated as judges began to be bribed.
So the rapist was once stoned to death as they were the adulterer of another man's wife. Wife being in law sister first is holy virgin. Holy mother second. Holy daughter. Titles of innocence.
Stated a sister and mother were by title allowed sex in marriage as adults. Adultress in human law female who was an adult allowed to let her hair tresses down and be seen as the hair had been covered before marriage. Had sex. Deemed Lawful.
Wearing head scarves innocent virgins notated in society...no touching allowed.
Why changed reading proves itself wrong as in society rape was never ever accepted.
Were chosen to be in a marriage. With equal a brother man. Not a father.
If a father took a daughter he was considered adult hence adulterer. Only a holy father could pass that edict upon another father. Daughter was not an adult.
Reasoned all daughters were innocent. As men kept them safe.
The law of court Romes jurisdiction would see any man from any country caught accused. As they were considered the high court.
Three the holy Trinity was a human Iaw. Human laws original protection as protector. Stated as men's raping behaviour was out of control in the past.
Muslims had accepted the Jesus verdict Trinity once. Why the laws are said in their papers.
Changed by cause of society and rich men. Then irradiation dementia. Misread and totally misquoted today.
Adulterer rapist men were stoned to death. It was never the victims fault.
A woman as a daughter cannot be the adulterer. Said the holy father.
Adult meant knowledge of the act of sex. In marriage adult sex was consensual.
An adulterer was who forced sex onto another. Adult to adult.
Only a man could rape a woman said father. No argument as it's old laws discussed.