Are you for real? American heroes?
What is heroic about meddling into the affairs of the nations in the region? (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc.)
What is heroic about toppling governments when they nationalize their oil? (i.e. 1953, Iran) What is heroic about installing kings/shahs/despots there?
What is heroic about surrounding that country with millitary bases when they make a revolution and become free?
What is heroic about supporting dictatorships against other states? (i.e. supporting Saddam against Kurds and Iran. Saudis against Yemen and Bahrain. Turkey against Syria. etc.).
What is heroic about trying to save the ***** of subserviant-ally dictatorships (family rules, kingdoms, sheikhdoms) whereas opposing non-subserviant dictatorships?
What is heroic about forming and supporting terrorist organizations (in Afghanistan, Sryria, Iraq, etc.) and then meking them excuse to invade those lands?
What is heroic about mistaken(!) drone strikes? Targeting the armies of the region and civilians as well.
American regime is the global terrorist state. Not a hero.
Yet, sadly, most of its people (ordinary Americans) are blinded by the so-called "patriotism" and fancy claims such as spreading freedom and democracy.
And, it is more saddening, that, some Muslims, especially those living in currently under the rule of American ally regimes (i.e. Qatar, Saud, Turkey, etc.) don't realize the fact that, they will be betrayed also by the same global terrorist state, when they are done with them.
The question I'm interested in would be a question we could ask of SA or Iran: Will your countries step in before ISIS is at your border and fight with the Muslims whose cities are currently under attack?
Please see this explanation by Hezbollah.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmtZErcUTXE
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar (the so-called friends of Syria) are the indirect founders of the ISIL. Their help to the so-called "moderate" insurgents-terrorists in the region, gave birth to the illegitimate "Islamic" "State". And it would be absurd if these regimes truly took actions against ISIL, unless by making them excuse to invade the non-subserviant states (Syria, Iraq).
As for Islamic Iran, she is against the invasions by the so-called international coalitions. She wants the nations take care of their problems. And they can, if certain global terrorist states and their allies stop helping the so-called "moderate" insurgents (which join "ISIS" more everyday). Yet, Iran is doing what she can. Like sending military advisors into Syria and Iraq, with which they achieved great victories against "ISIL".
I believe, Iran did not totally join the fight because the region is not yet ready. There is racism and sectarianism against her sadly. And sometimes, racists are so bigot that when they are down, they refuse the help from others, rather they like to be finished by their own kin. Trust me, I know. If Islamic Republic (Iran) interfered much in the region, the racist ones among Arabs, would continue to their sickening propaganda, "Majosis! (i.e. fireworshippers)! Persians! Safawids! They want to invade our lands!" These racists will realize their mistake, I believe. But then it will be more late.