New Evidence Found To Show Humans Came From Fish

[psychoslice]

You go with whatever you want. I'm no ape.

Stop concentrating on the few things we have in common and start looking at what makes us so dog gone different.

What is wrong with apes, do you think your better ?.

 

[Reggie Miller]

What is wrong with apes, do you think your better ?.

Doesn't get it. Totally.

 

[BilliardsBall]

Irrelevant response. This forum is open to atheists. If you do not like this it is your problem to fix not others.

You are saying the atheists who come here to harass religious persons are open to religion? I don't believe that is the case.

 

[Satans_Serrated_Edge]

You are saying the atheists who come here to harass religious persons are open to religion? I don't believe that is the case.

I am, although I dislike the term atheist. It's always seemed strange to me to label yourself vis a vis one specific belief you don't even hold. But I digress...

I've studied a cornucopia of different religious texts and religious people, and continue to do so. I anxiously await that evidence accompanied by that hulk-strong argument in favour of this or that religion that might convince me, and if it did, I would be fine with that. I am not emotionally invested in the idea none of them are true, yet the combination of the lack of tangibility and the tendency for many to believe just about anything leaves me more than sceptical.

 

[Shad]

You are saying the atheists who come here to harass religious persons are open to religion? I don't believe that is the case.

Another irrelevant response. If you think attacking weak arguments many theists post here is harassment you have a horrible idea of harassment and no idea what debate means.

 

[james bond]

Good.


Oh for the love of.......

What are you, 5 years old? Do you want to actually discuss this topic like an adult? If not, let me know now.



I guess in an odd sort of way seeing you admit that we see evolution happen is progress.



So you do actually believe that the epsom salt and sponge thing is indicative of all fossils. Amazing.



What assumptions are you talking about?



Incorrect.

Experimental evolution of multicellularity

Experimental evolution of resistance to an antimicrobial peptide

Are you talking about the poster child for evos -- the bacteria?

Bacteria does not reproduce sexually, as we all know, but they do not reproduce asexually either like the evos want them to.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You go with whatever you want. I'm no ape.

Stop concentrating on the few things we have in common and start looking at what makes us so dog gone different.

So you're going with your personal opinion. Got it.

I'm gonna go with the science.

 

[james bond]

Please provide an explanation of how fossilization can occur in days

See my linked experiment at top of #110.

 

[SkepticThinker]

That's BS. Notice I did not call you "dishonest" though ha ha. Why don't they demonstrate multiverses, dark energy, dark matter, aliens and so forth . I'm sure they all been published in Science and Nature.

It's not BS at all. That's how it works. We can demonstrate that the natural work exists, and we can examine and measure it. That's why science sticks with the natural. If someone could demonstrate the existence of the supernatural so that it can be examined and measured scientifically, that would certainly change things. Otherwise, what reason is there to believe there is a supernatural world at all?

Don't like it? Don't make claims you can't back up.

 

[Jose Fly]

Are you talking about the poster child for evos -- the bacteria?

I'm talking about how your claim that evolution "has no experiments" is demonstrably false.

Bacteria does not reproduce sexually, as we all know, but they do not reproduce asexually either like the evos want them to.

Um.....yeah.

 

[james bond]

It's not BS at all. That's how it works. We can demonstrate that the natural work exists, and we can examine and measure it. That's why science sticks with the natural. If someone could demonstrate the existence of the supernatural so that it can be examined and measured scientifically, that would certainly change things. Otherwise, what reason is there to believe there is a supernatural world at all?

Don't like it? Don't make claims you can't back up.

We're talking science and you can't back up any claim. I am skeptical of the Skeptic Sheep.

Your atheist science does not accept creation science from the people that created science. Use your head. This all changed in the 1800s with Charles Lyell and uniformitarianism. That was the first major BS. After that came his prize pupil Charles Darwin. Even bigger BS. Part of it was true, so the masses fell for it. It was to challenge the Christian church's authority. Even if it was science, once the dissenting voice of the church and the Bible was cast aside, the atheist scientists were able to seize power. Through evolution, they were able to gain the authority and power the church once had which leads us to today.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

We didn't "come from" apes. We are apes. Black people, white people, East Asians, etc. are all apes. We're primates.

 

[james bond]

I'm talking about how your claim that evolution "has no experiments" is demonstrably false.



Um.....yeah.

And I'm saying your experiments don't show much. Show me some major ones.

Which goes to demonstrate that evolutionists can't explain much with the experiments you cited.

 

[psychoslice]

Doesn't get it. Totally.

Well explain in stead of hiding your face.

 

[Reggie Miller]

So you're going with your personal opinion. Got it.

I'm gonna go with the science.

No, I'm going with God's word, for it is impossible that He should lie.

 

[Milton Platt]

See my linked experiment at top of #110.

I'm glad these threads are numbered...I would probably never have found that....
It doesn't hold any water. Do this with a sponge encased in sedimentary rock...and explain how the rock formed in a matter of days as well.

 

[Milton Platt]

You are saying the atheists who come here to harass religious persons are open to religion? I don't believe that is the case.

What exactly constitutes harassment in your humble opinion? Is disagreeing harassment? Is blowing holes in weak arguments harassment?

 

[gnostic]

What would you put this lack of understanding down to.
Lack of scientific education.
Or indoctrination.

I would say reggie suffer from both maladies.

 

[gnostic]

Call your local Chinese restaurant and see if you can't have that put on a fortune cookie. It's silly enough for it for sure.

I am Chinese, and I have worked in Chinese restaurant before...and I find your stereotyping, terribly offensive.

Have you ever been to Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong or China?

They don't have these "fortune cookies", you jerk.

 

[Reggie Miller]

I am Chinese, and I have worked in Chinese restaurant before...and I find your stereotyping, terribly offensive.

Have you ever been to Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong or China?

They don't have these "fortune cookies", you jerk.

I'm black and I can take a joke about blacks. So what's wrong with you, spoil sport?