" Embryonic pharyngeal arches are not gills and do not carry out the same function."
OK. The things I referred to as gills are not literally gills. Thanks for the clarification.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
" Embryonic pharyngeal arches are not gills and do not carry out the same function."
No. If you believe in no god, it's because you perceive reality to exist as such that no God exists. Your perception of it, makes it "right". As for multiple gods, I feel it's just personifying different aspects of life. (God of war, god of love, god of children god of animals etc etc etc)If there is only one god that is the creater of the earth, does that mean that every other religion that believes in something else is wrong?
The same reason brothers and sisters look different - genetics.If we are ALL god's children, why are there different races and different religions?
IMO - not very. Maybe a few key points may have been right, but for the most part, I don't really see it having too much validity.How accurate is the bible??
It wasn't...If it was originally written over 2000 years ago, and written in (hebrew?) and the english language isn't even that old, how was it translated to be read the exact way it was meant to be??
Absolutely.To me it would be like playing a game of telephone...by the time the story got back to you, its going to have changed in some way.
You don't necessarily need a miracle to have an experience of God. And I think more people talk with (not to) God than you may think. Thing is, you may not wish to see it. You may have been taught that it was "evil"Also, how come all these biblical stories of people who had visions or talked to god, and miracles such as the parting of the red sea never happens today?
Im just at the point where i consider myself to be agnostic because im not sure what to believe. Any input would be awesome. Thanks!
Ok well heres my story. My name is Cory and im 19 years old. As a little kid i was brought up as a baptist and went to church every sunday. As i got older, i stopped going, but would still consider myself a baptist. Well up until about 2 years ago, i started to question my faith and what i believed. Well now im just lost and want to here some answers, now i understand that some of my questions are very wide spread and may not be able to be answered. (Also, Im not sure if this is where this thread belongs, If it needs to be moved, please feel free to do so) Here are some of my questions. If there is only one god that is the creater of the earth, does that mean that every other religion that believes in something else is wrong? If we are ALL god's children, why are there different races and different religions? How accurate is the bible?? If it was originally written over 2000 years ago, and written in (hebrew?) and the english language isn't even that old, how was it translated to be read the exact way it was meant to be?? To me it would be like playing a game of telephone...by the time the story got back to you, its going to have changed in some way. Also, how come all these biblical stories of people who had visions or talked to god, and miracles such as the parting of the red sea never happens today? Im just at the point where i consider myself to be agnostic because im not sure what to believe. Any input would be awesome. Thanks!
Im def. loving hearing everyone's opinion and seeing different POVs. Sometimes i wonder if the world is based on science and if there in fact is a scientific explanation for everything. I look at people such as Benny Hinn and wonder if its true or if he is making a mockery of god. Sometimes i wonder if god is living among us and we just don't know it, And sometimes i wonder That there has to be some kind of higher power that created everything.
If there is only one god that is the creater of the earth, does that mean that every other religion that believes in something else is wrong?
If we are ALL god's children, why are there different races and different religions?
How accurate is the bible??
I look at people such as Benny Hinn and wonder if its true or if he is making a mockery of god.
Sometimes i wonder if god is living among us and we just don't know it
Don't bet on it! I was a cook in the AFThat embryonic recapitulation meme is an urban legend, like saltpeter in boot camp mess hall food.
Im also not THAT familiar with the bible, ive read parts of it and didn't really understand it, kind of like reading shakespeare. I've read basically about revelations and the raptures. and the basic stuff you learn as a kid.
Welcome Cory,1. If there is only one god that is the creater of the earth, does that mean that every other religion that believes in something else is wrong?
In the most obvious terms, we are all human and that does lend itself to the speculation that we are all from one source. My answer would be that we are all of similar, but different types of beings. One race is not superior to any other, but reflects differing worldviews based in ethnicity, culture and race. To me, it is just another form of expression of natural differences and becomes a central part of how the individual identifies their own sense of individuality. For all we know, the different races could just be developed from different lines, but that gets very confusing rather quickly and so we settle for parables like the Adam and Eve fable to explain that which is perhaps beyond our current scientific analysis and understanding.2. If we are ALL god's children, why are there different races and different religions?
There's the rub. We have no real way of knowing. The Bible did not exist in its present form until long after the events described within it. We have no physical proof that Jesus said any of the things quoted in the Bible, for example. Even if we did, how would we know that the writer of the work got the story straight? We wouldn't.3. How accurate is the bible?? If it was originally written over 2000 years ago, and written in (hebrew?) and the english language isn't even that old, how was it translated to be read the exact way it was meant to be??
A pretty good analogy. Closer to home, think of how you relate a news story you heard on the radio to someone who has not heard the news piece. Invariably you will alter the news story, however slightly. Multiply this by millions of people over thousands of years and you have modern mythology. Just because lots of people believe in a given account of events does not mean that those events, as depicted, are in way "true". It could just mean that a great number of people are extremely gullible.4. To me it would be like playing a game of telephone...by the time the story got back to you, its going to have changed in some way.
Precisely. There are those who will tell you that the miracles are already given and one is left to utilize "free will" to either accept their validity or reject them (usually with grave consequences... no pun intended, actually, but it fits nicely, lol). The simple fact is that there have been precious few "miracles" of any note in a very long time. Verifying the authenticity of those "miracles" is, by the very nature of miracles, somewhat difficult. Usually so-called "miracles" convince only those who are sitting on the fence nearby, as the faithful have no need of miracles and disbelievers would not accept anything short of Jesus descending from the clouds, flanked by a phalanx of angel, in broad daylight, down into Time square.5. Also, how come all these biblical stories of people who had visions or talked to god, and miracles such as the parting of the red sea never happens today?
You have to try to accept that being agnostic or even an atheist is perfectly OK. :yes: There is nothing wrong with either position, regardless of what the "true believers" might think about it. As long as you are "good" with your belief structures, as they are, you will do just fine.6. Im just at the point where i consider myself to be agnostic because im not sure what to believe. Any input would be awesome. Thanks!
Hello..Ok well heres my story. My name is Cory and im 19 years old. As a little kid i was brought up as a baptist and went to church every sunday. As i got older, i stopped going, but would still consider myself a baptist. Well up until about 2 years ago, i started to question my faith and what i believed. Well now im just lost and want to here some answers, now i understand that some of my questions are very wide spread and may not be able to be answered. (Also, Im not sure if this is where this thread belongs, If it needs to be moved, please feel free to do so) Here are some of my questions. If there is only one god that is the creater of the earth, does that mean that every other religion that believes in something else is wrong? If we are ALL god's children, why are there different races and different religions? How accurate is the bible?? If it was originally written over 2000 years ago, and written in (hebrew?) and the english language isn't even that old, how was it translated to be read the exact way it was meant to be?? To me it would be like playing a game of telephone...by the time the story got back to you, its going to have changed in some way. Also, how come all these biblical stories of people who had visions or talked to god, and miracles such as the parting of the red sea never happens today? Im just at the point where i consider myself to be agnostic because im not sure what to believe. Any input would be awesome. Thanks!
Welcome Cory,
The answer is yes and no. Yes, all religions are "wrong" in that they no longer embody the truths of their founders, but rather, are based on the hearsay of endless interpretations. Given that no two people see reality exactly the same way, it is a bit of a stretch to proclaim a given religion as being suitable for "all" mankind, regardless of what that religion is named by its followers. Likewise even the most devout "believers" must admit that the Earth may well have formed itself. Reality does not need "conscious" intervention to grow. Our universe could well have been the result of innumerable "chance" occurrences that melded together to form our little world... within a very, very large cosmos.
The other side of the coin has been reasonably expressed by others in this thread, so there is no need to further embellish things.
In the most obvious terms, we are all human and that does lend itself to the speculation that we are all from one source. My answer would be that we are all of similar, but different types of beings. One race is not superior to any other, but reflects differing worldviews based in ethnicity, culture and race. To me, it is just another form of expression of natural differences and becomes a central part of how the individual identifies their own sense of individuality. For all we know, the different races could just be developed from different lines, but that gets very confusing rather quickly and so we settle for parables like the Adam and Eve fable to explain that which is perhaps beyond our current scientific analysis and understanding.
There's the rub. We have no real way of knowing. The Bible did not exist in its present form until long after the events described within it. We have no physical proof that Jesus said any of the things quoted in the Bible, for example. Even if we did, how would we know that the writer of the work got the story straight? We wouldn't.
A pretty good analogy. Closer to home, think of how you relate a news story you heard on the radio to someone who has not heard the news piece. Invariably you will alter the news story, however slightly. Multiply this by millions of people over thousands of years and you have modern mythology. Just because lots of people believe in a given account of events does not mean that those events, as depicted, are in way "true". It could just mean that a great number of people are extremely gullible.
Precisely. There are those who will tell you that the miracles are already given and one is left to utilize "free will" to either accept their validity or reject them (usually with grave consequences... no pun intended, actually, but it fits nicely, lol). The simple fact is that there have been precious few "miracles" of any note in a very long time. Verifying the authenticity of those "miracles" is, by the very nature of miracles, somewhat difficult. Usually so-called "miracles" convince only those who are sitting on the fence nearby, as the faithful have no need of miracles and disbelievers would not accept anything short of Jesus descending from the clouds, flanked by a phalanx of angel, in broad daylight, down into Time square.
You have to try to accept that being agnostic or even an atheist is perfectly OK. :yes: There is nothing wrong with either position, regardless of what the "true believers" might think about it. As long as you are "good" with your belief structures, as they are, you will do just fine.
My advice is stay away from religions. :cover: It's not like they really have all that much to offer you, then again, if you are in doubt, you could simply submit to Pascal's Wagner to cover your butt. :flirt:
Hello..
The Hebrew language the bible was written in ... didn't change. King James had scholars interpret the hebrew into english. I'm not completely up to par on all of this.. but I can study on it and get back to you.
As far as other religions go.. Any religion that names other God's is false religion. Just like in the bible days.. those who worshipped Baal.. and other god's.. were FALSE.. and God was very displeased with them.
Miracles do still happen today. They may not be the parting of the red sea.. but I do believe God can still perform that miracle if need be. The so-called lack of miracles would be due to the lack of faith of the world today.