InformedIgnorance
Do you 'know' or believe?
I would point out that not all christians had any say on who the pope is, rather merely a hundred and some (exact number varies) high ranking catholic clergy; AND that the pope himself must be a Catholic male that doesnt hold any 'heretical' views (as defined by the Catholic church of course) and those heresy's often tend to be things that the church splits over, creating non catholic christians.If Christ isnt divided as Paul says, (1 Cor.1:13) then why wouldnt ALL Christians acknowledge The Pope as their Spiritual Father?
There is good reason the pope is not considered the leader of christianity; why would it be when not one of the adherents to any other christian denomination can ever be pope - what authority can such a position ever have over them when it enshrines doctrinal differences to such an extent.
edit:
Even Christianity Today acknowledges John Stokesley Catholic Bishop of London to be by far the most suspect individual in terms of whom may have arranged Phillips' betrayal of Tyndale; so rejecting the association without acknowledging the arguments does nothing to suggest neutrality in your reaction. I am not saying he was involved (and even if HE was involved that would not imply the church was involved) but to reject the association without acknowledging the merits AND limitations does you no favours.
Last edited: