Newton - The Last Of The Magicians

[Native]

From what you have posted here, I see why none of your submissions were accepted.

You see? This is how censors generally are working - Even those who themselves aren´t Peer Review censors, as yourself. (And Moderators shouldn´t act as censors at all)

You cannot see anything releveant if you cannot follow the possible genuine ideas in new thoughts.

 

[Polymath257]

The first reason to rejection is the cemented preconceptions which is impossible to deal with unless debaters (or censors in the Peer Review) open up their minds for alternative approachces and thoughts.

They are generally quite appy yo accept new ideas when they actually fit the data and actually explain something. But they will reject poorly thought out ideas that don't understand the basics and make claims that have been long shown to be false (or deny things that have long been demonstrated).

 

[Native]

Well, we understand why your ideas were rejected by peer reviewed journals (if any were ever submitted).

That must then be the Royal "WE" you are refeering to

 

[Polymath257]

You see? This is how censors generally are working - Even those who themselves aren´t Peer Review censors, as yourself. (And Moderators shouldn´t act as censors at all)

You cannot see anything releveant if you cannot follow the possible genuine ideas in new thoughts.

First of all, I have no censored any of your ideas. This is a discussion thread and not a professional scientific forum.

Second, yes, if you sent in a paper with the ideas you have presented here, I would recommend it not be published. I've no doubt that any referee your ideas were sent to would do the same.

That isn't censorship. It is weeding out the poorly thought out ideas and making sure the scientific process works as it should.

 

[Native]

They are generally quite appy yo accept new ideas when they actually fit the data and actually explain something.

Are you serious? If a new cosmological idea shall pass consensus data, how on Earth can new ideas ever come trough at all in an cosmological area when NO cosmological models agrees?

 

[Polymath257]

That must then be the Royal "WE" you are refeering to

Everyone on this forum that has any experience with science.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Feel welcome to elaborate on your claims.

First you must admit by your own standards that no one should take you seriously.

 

[Polymath257]

Are you serious? If a new cosmological idea shall pass consensus data, how on Earth can new ideas ever come trough at all in an cosmological area when NO cosmological models agrees?

I think you underestimate the range of ideas that are considered and debated in the scientific journals. The 'consensus' viewpoint is far from being the only one presented.

But those who are presenting new ideas *do* have the burden of showing how their ideas fit into the stuff that is known and where the consensus gets things wrong. Often, this must be done by considering the data in detail. And it usually involves a deep understanding of what the consensus model actually says and why it arrived at consensus.

You have shown nothing of scientific value in your threads. This is my opinion. But it is also the opinion of others that are scientifically trained. So it isn't surprising that any article you have submitted was summarily rejected.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Native said: ↑
Of course one cannot take a debater serious when he refuse to study anything of the matters.

What a kind of response is that? And from a Moderator???

It isn´t the debaters personally matters which are the subject or topic here, is it?

But OK, if you like: So you do understand why I don´t take your mythological comments seriously?

I merely used your own phrase against you.

And why didn't anyone else tell me about my promotion. Hmm, I might have to have a word with @Polymath257

 

[Polymath257]

I merely used your own phrase against you.

And why didn't anyone else tell me about my promotion. Hmm, I might have to have a word with @Polymath257

I assure you, I'm not in charge of hiring new Mods.

 

[Native]

First of all, I have no censored any of your.

To mee, you certainly acts so with your "bullit proofed "besserwissen statements"

Second, yes, if you sent in a paper with the ideas you have presented here, I would recommend it not be published. I've no doubt that any referee your ideas were sent to would do the same.

Of course! This is what ALL consensus censors do pr. automatism.

That isn't censorship. It is weeding out the poorly thought out ideas and making sure the scientific process works as it should.

Oh, give me a brake! No one are able to judge something which he/her themselves haven´t studied. Not even you Mr. Moderator.

You and your fellow consensus debaters just give the impression of knowing evrything, but in fact there is NOTING SOLID in anyone of the standing cosmological models, and you know this, if you hold your hand on your heart.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Are you serious? If a new cosmological idea shall pass consensus data, how on Earth can new ideas ever come trough at all in an cosmological area when NO cosmological models agrees?

For new ideas to be accepted they need to be better at explaining and making predictions than the old method.

You deny gravity, but gravity makes testable predictions. Does your model? How would you predict the orbits of the planets.

The same applies to both General and Special Relativity. How would EU apply to your phone's GPS for example?

 

[Native]

I merely used your own phrase against you.

Try an youse it against yourself too

And why didn't anyone else tell me about my promotion. Hmm, I might have to have a word with @Polymath257

Ups! Once again, huh? Sorry for your NOT promotion

 

[Subduction Zone]

Try an youse it against yourself too



Ups! Once again, huh? Sorry for your NOT promotion

But I have looked into the nonsense that you believe. It fails the number one test. It does not make superior predictions than the current model.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I assure you, I'm not in charge of hiring new Mods.

By the way, where's my check?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I assure you, I'm not in charge of hiring new Mods.

By the way, where's my check?

 

[Polymath257]

But I have looked into the nonsense that you believe. It fails the number one test. It does not make superior predictions than the current model.

From what I can see, it makes no predictions at all.

 

[Polymath257]

By the way, where's my check?

You'll get paid as much as I do.....

 

[Subduction Zone]

From what I can see, it makes no predictions at all.

Well I guess it can't be wrong then

 

[Subduction Zone]

You'll get paid as much as I do.....

Sweet! There's a new BMW that I have had my eyes on.