lukethethird
unknown member
I read up on your religion, your idea of unity is a nightmare.You would have to explain why you are nervous about all the human race having the same opportunities in education and life.
Regards Tony
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I read up on your religion, your idea of unity is a nightmare.You would have to explain why you are nervous about all the human race having the same opportunities in education and life.
Regards Tony
The thing about honorable and principled people is that others can easily recognize it in action. It isn't something claimed in a prideful way, and bragged about in public. It is exhibited in the nature of the person.The councils on how achieve unity come from their prophet, Baha'u'llah. I know that the Baha'i Faith also has a peace plan that they published, "Promise of World Peace". So, I think from their perspective, it's everybody else that has to change. They're doing the right thing and doing what is needed to bring about peace and unity. Although, it might not seem that way sometimes.
The councils on how achieve unity come from their prophet, Baha'u'llah. I know that the Baha'i Faith also has a peace plan that they published, "Promise of World Peace". So, I think from their perspective, it's everybody else that has to change. They're doing the right thing and doing what is needed to bring about peace and unity. Although, it might not seem that way sometimes.
There is so much Baha'is don't tell you. They have a "lesser peace" and a "greater peace." If the world leaders would have listened to Baha'u'llah, we would have gotten the greater peace right then. But no, he got rejected. So, to get even, I mean, to get what we deserve for rejecting him, we are going to first go through a lot of turmoil and then band together to achieve a secular "lesser" peace. No God necessary for that one. Just the world leaders agreeing to disarm and live in peace. Then there is the most great peace...Your approach IS militant, and I say that because you advocate only for religious people, and reject atheists. You also show your hand that you prefer those who believe in Jesus. Your view is highly prejudicial. That you don't seem aware of it would make you dangerous in a position of power.
You just now neglected to mention God as a path to unity, and this indicates a manipulative motive that will say whatever is needed to convince a person of your view.
I read up on your religion, your idea of unity is a nightmare.
We are already at a point to where it would be in our collective best interests to work together. But will we? In the U.S., we can't even work together. Baha'is say that the nations of the world need to disarm, except for enough weapons to maintain order. Which is what? Machine guns, cannons, rockets, jet fighters, tanks? But again, in the U.S., we can't get our own people to disarm.The thing about honorable and principled people is that others can easily recognize it in action. It isn't something claimed in a prideful way, and bragged about in public. It is exhibited in the nature of the person.
I understand there its an interest in global peace. But this is an ideal that assumes a sort of biological perfection inhumane biology, yet it doesn't exist. Humans evolved very imperfectly for modern life. there is mental illness and flaws that will always be an impression on societies as a whole. That means conflict.
Just looking at some of the members here and we see a good intention of peace and unity, but have personality flaws that sabotage that intent subconsciously. Ideology can only deliver people so far. there has to be a serious and sober introspective understanding of the self, as individuals. It means an effort to let go the ideology that appeals to the ego, and investigate the subconscious motives that drive many to believe in irrational ideas and dogmas. That's hard work. Religion is easier. Hard work rewards the self in deeper ways. But religion is easier.
Really? Baha'u'llah didn't bring anything new?I see they have been given by all the Messengers CG.
Regards Tony
In the past science resurgence was known to be Muslim who owned pyramids sciences.There is so much Baha'is don't tell you. They have a "lesser peace" and a "greater peace." If the world leaders would have listened to Baha'u'llah, we would have gotten the greater peace right then. But no, he got rejected. So, to get even, I mean, to get what we deserve for rejecting him, we are going to first go through a lot of turmoil and then band together to achieve a secular "lesser" peace. No God necessary for that one. Just the world leaders agreeing to disarm and live in peace. Then there is the most great peace...
Baha’u’llah envisioned a time in the future when the peoples of the world will live together in peace and unity as members of one faith. Universal justice will be established based on adherence to the law of God. A new civilization based on spiritual values will come into being. He referred to this as the Most Great Peace.
Instead of unifying over something that only a minorityThat's OK, you are not part of the Baha'i Faith.
We are talking about world unity.
Regards Tony
We are already at a point to where it would be in our collective best interests to work together. But will we? In the U.S., we can't even work together. Baha'is say that the nations of the world need to disarm, except for enough weapons to maintain order. Which is what? Machine guns, cannons, rockets, jet fighters, tanks? But again, in the U.S., we can't get our own people to disarm.
Really? Baha'u'llah didn't bring anything new?
Instead of unifying over something that only a minority
agree upon (that God fellow), how about something
more practical, eg, peace?
You seem to assume all humans are rational, emotionally stable, well educated, have equality, etc. Ideals about how things ought to be is the ideal of the middle class. The poor are busy struggling and dealing with their imposed disadvantages. The rich want to keep their advantages. How do you get unity when freedom means greed is allowed, and the poor can be exploited?We are already at a point to where it would be in our collective best interests to work together. But will we? In the U.S., we can't even work together. Baha'is say that the nations of the world need to disarm, except for enough weapons to maintain order. Which is what? Machine guns, cannons, rockets, jet fighters, tanks? But again, in the U.S., we can't get our own people to disarm.
Shouldn't we be getting nervous when people talk of unity?
What's there to be nervous about? From the link you gave...I read up on your religion, your idea of unity is a nightmare.
No, I don't assume people are rational. The Baha'is do include getting rid of the extremes of wealth and poverty. It is mentioned in their peace plan. Why Baha'is don't talk about it, I don't know.You seem to assume all humans are rational, emotionally stable, well educated, have equality, etc. Ideals about how things ought to be is the ideal of the middle class. The poor are busy struggling and dealing with their imposed disadvantages. The rich want to keep their advantages. How do you get unity when freedom means greed is allowed, and the poor can be exploited?
This is a follow on from the New Athiest Humanities Downfall?
It has been recorded.
"The well-being of mankind, its peace and security, are unattainable unless and until its unity is firmly established. This unity can never be achieved so long as the counsels which the Pen of the Most High hath revealed are suffered to pass unheeded."
(“Gleanings from the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh”, p. 286)
That is the topic of discussion.
So what are the councels that we will need to heed to find our unity?
Also, does this mean atheists and people of all the various faiths will not embrace those councels? (Personally I do not see that necessarily will be the case)
Regards Tony
What's there to be nervous about? From the link you gave...
Unity of God
Unity of religion
Unity of humanity
Equality between women and men
Elimination of all forms of prejudice
World peace and a new world order
Wait... What's that "new world order"? Clicking on that it says...
The phrase "new world order" in the Baháʼí Faith refers to the replacement of the collective political norms and values of the 19th century with a new system of worldwide governance that incorporates the Baháʼí ideals of unity and justice for all nations, races, creeds, and classes.
I guess that's not too bad? And then back to the original link...
With specific regard to the pursuit of world peace, Baháʼu'lláh prescribed a world-embracing collective security arrangement for the establishment of a temporary era of peace referred to in the Baha'i teachings as the Lesser Peace. For the establishment of a lasting peace (The Most Great Peace) and the purging of the "overwhelming Corruptions" it is necessary that all the people of the world universally unite under a universal Faith.
"Necessary" to unite under a universal Faith? Which of course is the Baha'i Faith. Okay, maybe a little nervous. But I'm sure Tony can reassure us there is nothing to be concerned about.
That's OK, you are not part of the Baha'i Faith.
We are talking about world unity.
Regards Tony
By removal of the vail in front of our eyes of physical worldI agree it comes from within and is up to each of us.
So how can that happen, other than the majority brace the need for that change?
Regards Tony