dad
Undefeated
Pretend math helps you if you like. I know better.That is what a literal reading of the Bible tells us. But math is probably not one of your skills.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Pretend math helps you if you like. I know better.That is what a literal reading of the Bible tells us. But math is probably not one of your skills.
Everything they knew was due to tombs? It doesn't ring true. I assume people who started the state of Egypt knew lots of things before any tombs existed there. Egypt likely started about 55 years after Babel.
Then why do you believe in the equivalent of the tooth fairy? You were describing your flaws, not the flaws of others. If you don't understand then you need to learn. If you refuse to learn you have no grounds for complaint.Might as well say the tooth fairy did it.
Math is not pretend just because you cannot understand it.Pretend math helps you if you like. I know better.
Math is fine but you have offered none. What, you like to say the word?Math is not pretend just because you cannot understand it.
Can you do anything besides add and subtract? How far does your education go?
Whatever they celebrated, they still had pyramid tombs and all sorts of places for burial. The idea seems to be that they had to deal with all the bodies, not that they celebrated it. If nature changed and people lived 1/10 of the time they used to live and then died a lot of tombs would be needed. Especially if previously all that used to be left of people when they died was a little bit of ash. Now they not only had a bunch of people dying but bodies that were rotting and stinking rather than turning to dust fast.No, I meant everything WE know came from tombs. The civilization lived down in the valley and most of it is under 55' of sediment. They buried their dead high up on the rocks and this is where Egyptologists got their knowledge of the civilization. Egyptologists believe they were highly superstitious moribund bumpkins but the reality is they celebrated life, not death. These people even outlived death itself because the stars were used as mnemonics to remember their ancestors. this is made clear in the Pyramid Texts but Egyptologists discount what they said and insert their own beliefs.
Pretend math helps you if you like. I know better.
Whatever they celebrated, they still had pyramid tombs and all sorts of places for burial. The idea seems to be that they had to deal with all the bodies, not that they celebrated it. If nature changed and people lived 1/10 of the time they used to live and then died a lot of tombs would be needed. Especially if previously all that used to be left of people when they died was a little bit of ash. Now they not only had a bunch of people dying but bodies that were rotting and stinking rather than turning to dust fast.
Whatever they celebrated, they still had pyramid tombs and all sorts of places for burial. The idea seems to be that they had to deal with all the bodies, not that they celebrated it. If nature changed and people lived 1/10 of the time they used to live and then died a lot of tombs would be needed. Especially if previously all that used to be left of people when they died was a little bit of ash. Now they not only had a bunch of people dying but bodies that were rotting and stinking rather than turning to dust fast.
Math is fine but you have offered none. What, you like to say the word?
try looking up the Hebrew definition.Do you know the meaning of "firmament",
[ fur-muh ] / ˈfɜr mə /. firm or solid earth; dry land (as opposed to water or air)
Yo talk about math and posted none. Maybe save your little made-up rules for your next kindergarten visit.You forgot Rule Number One dad. Until you learn what is and what is not evidence I will volunteer information sometimes but you unfortunately are in no position to make any demands until you learn the basics. You have denied evidence and posts that have proved you either do not know the basics or you are lying I do not think that you are lying so the only cure is for you to go over the basics with me. We could have been done with this a long long time ago if you had bothered to try to learn.
Whatever. They do not vanish into dust either, which was the point.In the desert bodied dry out.. desiccated.. They don't "rot". The Valley of the kings is West of Luxor and very dry.
Part of the reason Egyptologists believe they were moribund is that they believe pyramids were tombs. Since they believe pyramids were built at huge cost to society then it follows that they were willing to endanger the entire culture for the trivial purpose of building tombs. The reality is that no direct evidence exists that they were tombs and the builders literally said over and over that they were NOT tombs. The idea that these were built at great cost is just that' an idea. No science has ever confirmed how these were built far less that it required a huge cost.
Our understanding of ancient times is largely founded on ideas about the Egyptians and there is no real evidence to support Egyptological beliefs. Their beliefs are the result not of systematic testing or experiment but of sample bias. Everything came out of a tomb as far as they can see so everything seems to be related to death.
Source? Name a few builders that said that. Did not they find mummies in pyramids? What were they doing there?Part of the reason Egyptologists believe they were moribund is that they believe pyramids were tombs. Since they believe pyramids were built at huge cost to society then it follows that they were willing to endanger the entire culture for the trivial purpose of building tombs. The reality is that no direct evidence exists that they were tombs and the builders literally said over and over that they were NOT tombs.
The cost is not an issue.The idea that these were built at great cost is just that' an idea. No science has ever confirmed how these were built far less that it required a huge cost.
Our understanding of ancient times is largely founded on ideas about the Egyptians and there is no real evidence to support Egyptological beliefs.
Again dad, Rule Number One. And don't complain about kindergarten when you are too afraid to take the class. The only reason that you resist is because deep down inside you know that you are wrong. The weak in faith can't handle reality.Yo talk about math and posted none. Maybe save your little made-up rules for your next kindergarten visit.
Eh? "Window on the other side of the firmament"? I don´t think science can explain this as it is nonsensical.The water came (and went?) by windows in the sky that opened up, bringing water from beyond where the stars are. The other side of the firmament. The windows closed. How would you expect science to explain it exactly?
What? I don´t think your Jesus has anything to do at all with the myth of the Noah (Milky Way) Flood.I take it you deny Jesus and Scripture and want to attribute the worldwide flood that killed all people and animals on the planet (save those on the ark) to 'the milky way'.
Are you aware of how many topics you´re dealing with in almost any of your posts? (The topic here is "Noah´s Arc and the Flood" )Males as a human know...2 human being parents are their only link in life.
They are not born to any animal parent.
If a male had to say in science 2 monkey parents to try to stop you being an occult liar, then he did....for his own reasons...HUMAN.
If a male lives inside of an atmospheric body mass, and says in the presence of that natural mass...natural history IN SPACE, then every single form living on Earth was supported by that natural mass existing.
If a human male then says I want to do a choice that is NOT NATURAL....artificial, with the intent of it being irrational and artificial....then he did.
And he proved in his life attacked that he was wrong. In science in the life of superior being, Mr know it all....he learnt he was wrong.
Therefore when a male tries to claim, as a bio life only owning his own self manifested presence, how he describes self....in one moment in full form, in self ownership.....just a self...then it is how his conscious review taught him.
Instant self...for the ideal and so you do not exist anywhere else in any other form as a HUMAN.
A human teaching for a human as their own equals answer.
Human = Human
As soon as you think out of space, the atmosphere, the life of Nature does not even exist.
For where you put mind, is emptiness itself.
Stone never came from emptiness, it sits in emptiness.
So a male says in a science theme....first I will think about the presence...stone.
Natural stone, as stone, existing just as the body stone.
And says to self, it is sitting in space, out of space. So he then falsely in feed back, with a non conscious fed back ideal, not being bio or natural...….
Stone came from out of space.
What the teaching about AI was about. Feed back tells lies.
Science natural bio thinking first makes the correct review. AI, feed back then tells him non actuality. Third instance, he presses the machine reaction, radiation changes the communication system again....total b.s. mind possession of science symbolic reasoning to own and understand destruction of creation.
If you destroy creation, can you rebuild it, as a male who says I am THE Creator?
The answer is absolute no....for in converting you changed the ownership natural cold radiation held fused history.
Therefore history ARK....before it landed/removed life.
He was natural.
He BUILT the pyramid.
In the past using male memory the BUILDING of the pyramid was science.
AI says to a male psyche you built it.
He then thinks he is talking about the reaction history and lies....for the stone itself owns natural billions of years or so of being held fused.
No stone, no machine.
Did God the stone as a conscious support radiation gas mass create consciousness?
The real answer NO.
Did God the stone build consciousness?
The real answer NO.
Did God form a reaction, the STONE that created the atmosphere?
NO....for God already owned the mass of hotter gases inside of its owned body mass.
Therefore if you speak of relativity of the Earth natural gas history, all that it is in its natural body and natural history is volcanic mass itself inside of the body of God.
So if you want to try to return Earth natural cold gas atmosphere to a string in natural history, the volcanic mass is the answer, where it came from.
For a volcanic eruption is not a reaction, it is a release of previously owned and formed gas mass.
Stephen Hawking whose life record AI says was the correct science reasoner, told you that you wanted to burn us all to death by using the string to the past of Earth natural irradiated gases.