• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Nominate RF's Enforcers!

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
RF needs enforcers to protect us from the hired goons of other forums.
Face it...the mods are just too weak & accommodating.
We need real thumb breaking goombas.

I nominate St Frank:
- He's pumped full of testosterone.
- He's tough...he tells it like he sees it.
- His cute appearance will disarm the bad guys.

Please, not so much honesty that noses are put out of joint.
Misbehave, & you might get yer thumbs broken!
 
Last edited:

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Please, not so much honesty that noses are put out of joint.

I nominate St Frank:
- He's pumped full of testosterone.
- He's tough...he tells it like he sees it.
- His cute appearance will disarm the bad guys.

Who is St Frank? Are you posting on the right forum?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Bah, no way. I'm totally against it.

St Frank might be full of testosterone, but unless he can physically get hold of our opponents, it's not going to help. We need to form an elite strike squad. I have thought about this many, many times, since I envisaged a day after my ascension when I needed to quell rebellious thought. Ummm...I mean...here's something off the top of my head...

We invite every flamer, every drooling theocratic fundie, every angry atheist with a neckbeard, every thread derailing malcontent (apart from me), and have try outs.

Put up a thread, and see which of these trouble-makers can derail it most efficiently. Which can drive the other posters to despair. Can cause them to question whether they are even conversing in the same language.

We give them a catchy uniform, and a spiffy title. Something like...erm...Lewisnotmiller's Rabid Dogs. Just...for instance...ummm...

And whenever we identify a problem (and by 'we' I mean 'I') we set our Dogs on them.

Just imagine all of RF's trollers gathered in one elite thread derailing force. We could shut down a thread in seconds. Hell, I reckon a forum would take a minute, and a small sovereign nation could be wound up within 24 hours.

*sighs and dreams happily*
 

4consideration

*
Premium Member
We invite every flamer, every drooling theocratic fundie, every angry atheist with a neckbeard, every thread derailing malcontent (apart from me), and have try outs.

Put up a thread, and see which of these trouble-makers can derail it most efficiently. Which can drive the other posters to despair. Can cause them to question whether they are even conversing in the same language.

Try outs? I like it!

We could also have sock puppet shows, and people could demonstrate their ability to pretend to be other people, from opposing belief systems -- that argue vehemently with themselves!

I have no real idea how to tie this one back to the OP. I just wanted to say it. Consider this my try-out.

How'd I do? AM I ON THE TEAM?
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Try outs? I like it!

We could also have sock puppet shows, and people could demonstrate their ability to pretend to be other people, from opposing belief systems -- that argue vehemently with themselves!

I have no real idea how to tie this one back to the OP. I just wanted to say it. Consider this my try-out.

How'd I do? AM I ON THE TEAM?

I say this only to be helpful, but your audition would have been helped with the following change...

Instead of

How'd I do? AM I ON THE TEAM

You need to go with something like

How'd I do? AM WE ON THE TEAM??!!

It's a subtle difference, so just to clarify.
Use of font sizes and colour are well-established methods for really making a point when you have no point to make.
The use of incorrect grammar is also generally useful in establishing street cred. But more than that, flipping between 'I' and 'we' somewhat randomly allows people to wonder about either your sock-puppetness, or which of your personalities they are currently dealing with.

Don't take it badly, though. You weren't expected to make the cut. As was previously mentioned in this thread, mods here are too weak and accommodating.

;)
 

4consideration

*
Premium Member
Oh, yeah? Well...

...lo ek dkluhlkfg slkhudgh;o ehkl egu ;lsegil8ul uah ;o cer knggioagh;kjhkh...kuhgdskulegslk.;ljlseulierksdangkuyk

...and another thing...

I didn't really want to be on the team, anyway! Humph! :p
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Another strong contender is Tarheeler, the mean looking biker dude.
This is him smiling....
10614150_4676490087136_5474634833558885369_n.jpg
 
Last edited:

xkatz

Well-Known Member
St Frankenstein

Pros:
>Catholic as ****
>Makes protestant and atheist fundies roll in their graves
>Half holy person, half unholy undead entity
>Is from Ohio, so he must be tough
>Is not Revoltingest
>Doesn't take no for answer

Cons:
>Is from Ohio (AKA the worst state in the union)
>Is not me

I say yes.
 
Top