JMorris
Democratic Socialist
Understanding isn't enough?
not for me. if it is for someone else, thats fine. it just dosent seem worth it for me.
Yep.
then like i said, just dosent seem worth the trouble.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Understanding isn't enough?
Yep.
Well, I value knowledge for its own sake.not for me. if it is for someone else, thats fine. it just dosent seem worth it for me.
then like i said, just dosent seem worth the trouble.
Well, I value knowledge for its own sake.
Well you see most people misspell it, it's just Hel will one L.....^_^What is this hell you speak of?
i have a genuine question for those of you who are members of religions that dont have a hell. its something ive been curious about, if your religion has no punishment for non-belief/knowledge, then what is the point? i mean, what do you gain from it? im not trying to criticize you for your belief or anything, i just dont get it. how i see it, if theres nothing lost, then theres nothing gained. will my non-belief be treated equally to your belief?
Actually, I don't think it's knowable, myself. But just because it's impossible doesn't mean there's no point in trying.as do i. but i consider this sort of thing unknowable. which is why i dont see the point. if you consider it knowable, and really believe there is some way to find out, then i could see the reason for trying, but i dont.
According to LDS (Mormon) beliefs, you or those others would not go to Hell.
So you're better off never hearing about Jesus and the gospels?
Makes sense to me.
Actually, I don't think it's knowable, myself. But just because it's impossible doesn't mean there's no point in trying.
Maybe to you.attempting to know that which is inherently unknowable would seem to be futile and a waste of time. it would seem a better use of one's time to try and learn things which can be known.
Maybe to you.
What's important is to try. Even the smallest chance of success is lost if you don't.obviously.
but, when all is said and done, who is going to have more knowledge of god or the after life? a person who spends their life trying to know what cannot be known, or someone like me who simply shrugs it off? the fact that it is unknowable would mean that neither have a better understanding.
if spending your time trying to know this stuff makes you happy and all that, then fine. but as the value of the knowledge gained, there is none, because no knowledge will have been gained.
What's important is to try. Even the smallest chance of success is lost if you don't.
Cruelty has nothing to do with theology, only human nature.what are the chances of knowing something that cannot be known? there is no chance of success. but there has certainly been a result in trying, savage cruelty brought about by just 1 more needless thing that divides people.
Cruelty has nothing to do with theology, only human nature.
i agree. if there wasnt religion, people would still find reasons to brutalize each other.
Well, now that I am getting educated, the original testament didn't even speak of any hell. So, I now consider hell a fabrication of human minds that wanted to scare others into staying with the church. I guess this is a christian topic instead of an all around religious debate.
I just wonder how much more of the "new" testament is made up to please the masses. Not to be a fire starter of course, but this itches my mind a great deal and I respect all opinions. As always, your feedback is most welcome and appreciated.
Well, when you're subject matter is an invisible being that controls every aspect of the universe.... How do you determine which books are "made up", and which aren't? Why is anything in the Old Testament any more "true" than the stuff in the New Testament? Why is hell any more "real" if it is (or is not) mentioned in the Tanakh as opposed to the New Testament?