• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Not a sin anymore???

F

F1fan

Veteran Member
We Never Know said:
But they aren't curious of you. In their mind they think they are trying to help you.
Click to expand...
Yet they should know better if they are truly moral, and respecting other's views and status on matters, like their sexual nature. If Christians want to pressure other Christians about homosexuality that comes with the affiliation of the tribe, and some might abandon it. But as we see, even among the tribe of Christians there are many who accept homosexuality as part of a person's nature, not a sin.

So then, is it a problem of obsolete beliefs and intolerance to see gays as sinners? Has the tolerance of gays changed the sinner from the gay, to the Christian condemner? Isn't bigotry a sin?
 
We Never Know

We Never Know

No Slack
F1fan said:
Yet they should know better if they are truly moral, and respecting other's views and status on matters, like their sexual nature. If Christians want to pressure other Christians about homosexuality that comes with the affiliation of the tribe, and some might abandon it. But as we see, even among the tribe of Christians there are many who accept homosexuality as part of a person's nature, not a sin.

So then, is it a problem of obsolete beliefs and intolerance to see gays as sinners? Has the tolerance of gays changed the sinner from the gay, to the Christian condemner? Isn't bigotry a sin?
Click to expand...

"they should know better if they are truly moral"

So should you!
 
Shadow Wolf

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
We Never Know said:
I knew what it was. I also know some that are and were in the club.
Thise that write they books don't see everything. They guess on much.
Click to expand...
He interviewed the Angels extensively, my point is fair and valid. It's a very lame counterpoint to bring up a work of fiction to say a work of nonfiction is just a book.
Is Origin of Species just a book like the Vampire Chronicles? Surely you can see where this just doesn't work.
Now, back to the point if it's gay or not depends on the perspective. In ancient times some cultures were more concerned about taking active and passive roles, with the active role just being sex with the passive role being looked down upon.
 
We Never Know

We Never Know

No Slack
Shadow Wolf said:
He interviewed the Angels extensively, my point is fair and valid. It's a very lame counterpoint to bring up a work of fiction to say a work of nonfiction is just a book.
Is Origin of Species just a book like the Vampire Chronicles? Surely you can see where this just doesn't work.
Now, back to the point if it's gay or not depends on the perspective. In ancient times some cultures were more concerned about taking active and passive roles, with the active role just being sex with the passive role being looked down upon.
Click to expand...

If you say so. I gave valid points.
I'm not into arguing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top