Hermit Philosopher
Selflessly here for you
The main problem with intrusion is that we accept it because of poor reasoning.
We may accept intrusion if we believe that it will “ensure our safety”, but we can only believe this by ignoring that any method of intrusion that is in place, can be high jacked by a/the threat itself; giving it access to information with which to harm us beyond comprehension.
We may accept intrusion if we believe that we have “nothing to hide”, but we can only believe this by incorrectly assuming:
Would you inform on your fellow citizens…? Surely, no one of sane mind could agree to do so without knowing what sort of information was in question?!:
Humbly
Hermit
We may accept intrusion if we believe that it will “ensure our safety”, but we can only believe this by ignoring that any method of intrusion that is in place, can be high jacked by a/the threat itself; giving it access to information with which to harm us beyond comprehension.
We may accept intrusion if we believe that we have “nothing to hide”, but we can only believe this by incorrectly assuming:
- that we will always know the “intruder”
- that the “intruder” we know will always be trustworthy
- that we will always share -or at least approve of- that “intruder’s” interests in us and in what we do.
Would you inform on your fellow citizens…? Surely, no one of sane mind could agree to do so without knowing what sort of information was in question?!:
- The immigrant without correct documentation?
- The teen who went for an abortion?
- The dude smoking weed in the evenings?
- The gay couple down the road?
- The mixed race couple next door?
- The person of faith?
- The atheist?
Humbly
Hermit