Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then why is Obama carrying on with many of the Bush policies everyone has been railing against?given the state of american politics.......... it is an accomplishment
Then why is Obama carrying on with many of the Bush policies everyone has been railing against?
Given that Henry Kissinger and Yasser Arafat have won the Peace prize no reassessment is needed.
Then why is Obama carrying on with many of the Bush policies everyone has been railing against?
Yes lets ignore all the other travesties committed by those men. That single action means they should get a Peace prize.how so?
kissinger got it for the Paris peace accords in 1972.
Arafat got it along with Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin in 1994 for the Oslo accords.
so givern those facts i think i am justified in asking what's your point?
Yes lets ignore all the other travesties committed by those men. That single action means they should get a Peace prize.
There is remarkably little to understand about the Peace Prize. Its a sham, and any prestige that comes with it is entirely unwarranted.well obviously that's how the Nobel committee felt, so how about Obama what single action has he performed that would have a similar impact on the committee? I am not justifying anyone's award or decrying Obamas, just trying to understand it.