Riders
Well-Known Member
You have no quote or source from Mueller. You have an article which claims X, nothing more.
You didn't read your own link... Did you note it also include remark about Sessions, other officials, WH statements, etc not only Comey
Again read your own source.
"He has told the president’s lawyers that he will follow Nixon- and Clinton-era Justice Department memos that concluded that a sitting president cannot be indicted, Mr. Giuliani has said. If Mr. Mueller does not plan to make a case in court, a report of his findings could be sent to Congress, leaving it to lawmakers to decide whether to begin impeachment proceedings."
Again not reading your own source. "Mr. Mueller wants to question the president about the tweets. His interest in them is the latest addition to a range of presidential actions he is investigating as a possible obstruction case" All of which is from an anonymous source...
Do you know the difference "possible" and an actuality?
Do you know the difference from an official PR and an anonymous unconfirmed source?
Mueller has not gone on the news about obstruction case nor has the office commented as per "A spokesman for Mr. Mueller’s office declined to comment." in your own source again.
Bring up fantasy when you can demonstrate you have the ability to read what you cite.
Mueller is confined to the Russian probe and it's authority only.
Your just jumping to anything any little tiny detail I was off about so you can make this into way way less then what it is. Trumps as^ is in trouble thats all there is to it and you can make it into whatever you want.