Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That was an error on his part. He was going along with the interviewer, it took less time to go along with him than to explain the full context of his statement.Then why did Obama correct himself?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That was an error on his part. He was going along with the interviewer, it took less time to go along with him than to explain the full context of his statement.Then why did Obama correct himself?
You've no explanation for Obama's correcting himself.Obama did not make a gaffe. That was done by Stephanopolous. He did not understand the "my Muslim faith" in context. Obama was discussing how others claimed that he had a Muslim faith and he pointed out that McCain never brought up "my Muslim faith" a defense of McCain. In context George screwed up.
That's quite a stretch...to explain away one gaffe with a subsequent gaffe about the gaffe.That was an error on his part. He was going along with the interviewer, it took less time to go along with him than to explain the full context of his statement.
You've no explanation for Obama's correcting himself.
But we'll have to agree to disagree about this.
No, once again time was at a premium. One let's the small errors go.That's quite a stretch...to explain away one gaffe with a subsequent gaffe about the gaffe.
But even if we take your explanation as cromulent, it shows that even Obama is
capable of a mistake. Certainly, a verbally less capable Trump is so capable too.
I only say that this is possible. I don't know Trump's intentions.
This is a pretty strained attempt to rationalize away a gaffe.No, once again time was at a premium. One let's the small errors go.
This horse is thoroughly beaten.No, that was an explanation. If someone does not understand you and it would take excessive time to explain a minor point one often will concede and move on. In an interview time
is at a premium. The transcript makes the context clear.
Let me break it down. Some Republicans made false claims that Obama was a Muslim. He mentioned McCain because though he was not guilty of that and he specifically cleared him of those accusations. George did not understand the correction himself. Read the transcript, don't listen to the interview. It is easier to follow if you do so.
I get it.I think this example of a `gaffe` by Obama counts not at all,
but if counted...Trump has about 4000 `gaffes` now.
Most people call them lies, but what the hell, two out of Trump's 4000, some comparison there, right ?
Seriously read the transcript. And remember time is at a premium.This is a pretty strained attempt to rationalize away a gaffe.
This horse is thoroughly beaten.
Each thinks the other is in denial.
We'll agree to disagree.
I already did.Seriously read the transcript. And remember time is at a premium.
Quite a few Republicans spoke out about how horrible that press conference was, but I wonder if they will just forget the whole thing in a day or two and let the Orange Pumpkin continue to roll along without protest.
Honestly?Are you arguing over this because you see no possibility that Trump misspoke?
Always.Honestly?
I asked so that I'd know what you believe.I do believe he didn't misspeak at all. He really meant "well...I don't see why the Russian government should be responsible for that"
Then..."someone" (I know who) induced him to take it back.
(btw...u're speaking to a blind Putin's supporter)
You are trying to explain something to someone who voted for and still supports Trump, so why should you expect rational responses? C'mon, if nothing else they have to fabricate excuses as to why they voted for such a mental & moral midget.No, that was an explanation. If someone does not understand you and it would take excessive time to explain a minor point one often will concede and move on.
Trump supporters don't know how to count beyond their toes & fingers, so how in the heck do you expect them to know what 4000 is???I think this example of a `gaffe` by Obama counts not at all,
but if counted...Trump has about 4000 `gaffes` now.
Most people call them lies, but what the hell, two out of Trump's 4000, some comparison there, right ?
Since you have me on <ignore>, you've really no idea what I support.You are trying to explain something to someone who voted for and still supports Trump, so why should you expect rational responses? C'mon, if nothing else they have to fabricate excuses as to why they voted for such a mental & moral midget.
This post is typical of anti-Trumpers.Trump supporters don't know how to count beyond their toes & fingers, so how in the heck do you expect them to know what 4000 is???
Since you have me on <ignore>, you've really no idea what I support.
Voting for Trump made sense in order to keep an incompetent, corrupt,
war mongering alternative out of office. But I understand that those
shortcomings don't bother you.
In Michiganistan it was close.I can empathize a bit, though I disagree. I was ready to vote for Hillary even though I thought that she was a horrible candidate. I was lucky, In my state there was no contest so I was able to vote against both. I knew the candidate I voted for had no chance, but it was the best way to send my very limited message across. And I was not alone. In Washington we had the highest percentage ever of third party votes.
You should get back to just counting all the spiders.Trump supporters don't know how to count beyond their toes & fingers, so how in the heck do you expect them to know what 4000 is???