Bingo.
But men get off the hook. And are even encouraged too.
Welcome back to the 1800s
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Ohio state representative says she would consider banning birth control following abortion outlaw
- Thread starter Wandering Monk
- Start date
Bingo.
But men get off the hook. And are even encouraged too.
Welcome back to the 1800s
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
TheBannerofHomuraAkemi
Active Member
She would consider.
Nobody will take her seriously.
By the way, the best hormonal pills are from Europe.
The most sold contraceptives are from a German pharmaceutical company.
Maybe they hate Germany?
Nope, Thomas has already said that the scotus will look at griswold.
That would be really sad if such a thing were taken seriously.
If they dislike abortions, they should fund contraception.
Last edited:
No questions all illusions.
Truth in love
Well-Known Member
I'm guessing the no birth control bill dies in committee pretty hard.
How so?
I'm seeing things much worse for men than before.
I still see no legal requirements for men to stick around to support their kids.
Child support maybe. But even that's not a guarantee.
(My father never paid a dime, thanks to moving frequently, for instance)
That some evade paying child support doesn't mean
there isn't strong legal authority to make'm pay.
If government couldn't force him to pay, they certainly
couldn't force him to stay.
BTW, there are no greater requirements to make mothers
stay or pay.
Except keeping them pregnant against their will?
I mean a man can still flee if he gets someone pregnant. He doesn’t give birth at the end of the day.
So it’s probably still easier to escape responsibility for the man at the end of the day, let’s be real here.
That said, I can’t help but foresee a rise in “dumpster babies” in the US as a consequence to the alluded to R v W ruling, which is ugly in more ways than one. I mean not all will be healthy, not all will even be alive and indeed not all will signal an end to the woman’s medical needs. If you catch my drift?
Last edited:
The argument I hear from anti-abortion types is that
is a de minimis imposition. (Of course, I disagree.)
The woman has an equal ability
to flee after the baby is born.
The most significant thing (IMO) about abortion rights
is the legal imposition upon the mother...mental, financial,
& especially physical. Father rights & obligations are
important, but a separable set of issues.
But isn't this SCOTUS ruling an excellent occasion to embrace socialism totally?
I mean...the State funds universal healthcare, contraception. And in case of unwanted pregnancies, the State will take care of the children.
So it will surely satisfy anti-abortionists and most pro-choice people.
Also a great occasion for global thermonuclear war,But isn't this SCOTUS ruling an excellent occasion to embrace socialism totally?
self replicating killer nanobots on the loose, & the
revival of Jar Jar Binks in Star Wars new releases.
I deeply thank Americans for liberating my country and giving it away to the staunchest Socialists and Communists in Europe...who wrote one of the most socialist Constitutions in the world.Thank you dears
We thank you for tiramisu.
Thank you dears
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Actually according to the article she didn't say that at all.
Excerpted....
"When asked about banning birth control, Schmidt said she would consider it."
Gosh.
They are really trying very hard to destroy the social contract and therefore the USA.
It is sad. Very sad indeed.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
According to the article that's not an actual quote.
"That’s another issue for another day and I’m going to have to listen to both sides of the debate,” she said. “Right now, what I’m concerned about right now is the life of the child and the fact that we have the opportunity in Ohio to protect it from its conception until its natural death.”
The way people are taking is as if she said she's for banning birth control. That's not at all what was said.
The quote shows her willingness to consider banning contraception.
The statement about the quote is accurate.