The tools of science are as excellent and reliable as your religious based world view is bad,
This reflect your 'fallacy arguing from ignorance' with an anti-science religious agenda basing your argument on what you believe science does not know, which is the same religious based argument the the Discovery Institute uses.
Science does not have a problem you do.
I am my own man and think by myself because I had to learned this as a development scientist solving problems and creating new things. You do not seem to have a good handle on the concept of a conceptual foundation. This is key to assessing theory. You do not seem to notice, that nobody has ever found any first replicators, as fossil or anything, to show this assumption real and not just a pipe dream. That does not bother you? I thought proof was very important, especially for such a fundamental foundation premise of any theory.
The status quo also uses this unproven, first replicator assumption, as the unproven assumption for time=0, that then supports the entire theory of evolution. These fundamental or foundation premies are all based on faith; in what has not been seen. You do not seem to understand the difference between a valid science argument; with proof, and the charisma of faith, that is common to religion. I respect your faith. I am arguing against the Evolutionary religion, based on imaginary replicators, that lack proof. Black box math sort of allows this, but reason does not. Proof would be Better than just faith in empirical lab coats.
We could put God, in that same black box, and never open it, thereby avoiding all the necessary proof of God, like we do with the first replicator theory. Will the black box smoke screen make God, as true as the first replicators, of do both still have no science proof?
In modern cells, the DNA; replicators aspect, is packed as chromosomes and taken off line, during cell cycles. The DNA is offline. It is the protein grid, is what separates the two daughter cells. It make more sense to have the cell body work the replicators. Trying to populate a useful protein grid, starting with naked replicators, makes no sense, since the protein contain all the muscle needed to help the replicators. The replicators are the hard drive and not the CPU. The protein do all the processing, even on DNA and RNA; protein are the CPU. Protein first makes more sense since you have the muscle to work the replicators.
Water is the best way to go as the foundational CPU, since proteins are not active until packed by water. Then the protein can work the DNA. Water is the Swiss Army knife of nature having over 70 anomalous properties, for all occasions. Water is the most abundant solid material in the universe; ice. This makes star formation much easier. Ice is easy for gravity to attract, over a wider range of temperature, with water also containing the hydrogen needed for fusion.
The anomaly of water, expanding when it freezes, allowed life to sustain on earth. The floating ice will stay at the surface of water, and insulate the water below, from the cold, so life can wait until it gets warm. If ice sank, like most materials in nature, this would cause the oceans to rain down winter snow, and freeze over time. The heating cycles of summer, would never reach the deeper bottom snow and the ice/snow will pile up year after year, on the ocean floor and lakes floors, burying life. Water was designed to help life. Our bodies are 55-60% water. Below the fish can find pockets of 50F water; earth temperature, even in winter due to floating ice insulation; igloo effect.