Umm? Not sure what that's got to do with evolution?and you really don't KNOW how life began to "replicate." Anything you say is mere conjecture.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Umm? Not sure what that's got to do with evolution?and you really don't KNOW how life began to "replicate." Anything you say is mere conjecture.
Then you need to learn more about the theory. bye for now.Umm? Not sure what that's got to do with evolution?
Abiogenesis and evolution are separate things...Then you need to learn more about the theory. bye for now.
I'm not talking now about abiogenesis, but rather the first few items science figures was the start of evolution. NOT abiogenesis.Abiogenesis and evolution are separate things...
That's basically the same thing friend. Science is fuzzy. You're trying to draw a line where there isn't one.I'm not talking now about abiogenesis, but rather the first few items science figures was the start of evolution. NOT abiogenesis.
OK, well what was the very first lifeform on the earth?Umm? Not sure what that's got to do with evolution?
OK, are you saying that scientists don't know what the first lifeform was on earth?That's basically the same thing friend. Science is fuzzy. You're trying to draw a line where there isn't one.
We know it wasn't humanOK, are you saying that scientists don't know what the first lifeform was on earth?
OK, are you saying that scientists don't know what the first lifeform was on earth?
oh boy! Excellent! I think.We know it wasn't human
ya know, I looked at that before you linked to it, and guess what? Reminded me of textbooks that make statements without backup.Early Life on Earth – Animal Origins
Learn what fossil evidence reveals about the origins of the first life on Earth, from bacteria to animals, including the phyla we know today.naturalhistory.si.edu
“There's none so blind as those who will not see”ya know, I looked at that before you linked to it, and guess what? Reminded me of textbooks that make statements without backup.
I blindly accept nothing. Nor do scientists. I follow the evidence. You do not.Whether you realize it or not, you're preaching your belief, even though you just accept whatever you want to without investigating or...thinking hard, Valjean. You just blindly accept what the scientific consensus may be. You couldn't possibly understand everything there is to know within the theoretical analysis. And I'm speaking even of the basics. You...and others ..do ..not...know no matter if you think you do and swear by it. I have come to this conclusion after reading these many posts.
They might become shaped a little like fish, but anatomically they'd be quite different. You might be able to get a facsimile of a fish from an amphioxus, but there's no easy way to reëngineer mammalian anatomy into a fish.How do you know they wouldn't look like fish? Maybe transitionally they would look like crocodiles. Thank you!!
What sort of textbook makes claims without backup? Wouldn't that be a fantasty book?ya know, I looked at that before you linked to it, and guess what? Reminded me of textbooks that make statements without backup.
Where's the backup? You can't see because -- it's -- not == there for our eyes to "see." Genes are there -- bones are there -- fossils are there -- brains of various sizes are there -- but those things do not verify lifeforms via the process of the theory of evolution. Nope. I am thankful or that.“There's none so blind as those who will not see”
-Jonathan Swift
I'm afraid you have not read a textbook about evolution lately. There are statements all over the place with nothing but statements as to what the authors think. Or put there.What sort of textbook makes claims without backup? Wouldn't that be a fantasty book?
You can see with more than your eyes.Where's the backup? You can't see because -- it's -- not == there for our eyes to "see." Genes are there -- bones are there -- fossils are there -- brains of various sizes are there -- but those things do not verify lifeforms via the process of the theory of evolution. Nope. I am thankful or that.
Yayyy!!You can see with more than your eyes.
But your as obstinate as ever. Back on ignore you go.