Farmall F12 like this one for me.
(Albeit un-restored)
Tractors have evolved a long way since prehistoric times.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Online Reference: FAQs and tutorials on the Theory of Evolution
- Thread starter LuisDantas
- Start date
Tractors have evolved a long way since prehistoric times.
Secret Chief
Veteran Member
God help me, I think that looks really cool.Farmall F12 like this one for me.
(Albeit un-restored)
It is what's called an "unstyled" tractor because
it lacks the smooth lines of later ones like this....
First you have to use up all those cases of toilet paper.
Secret Chief
Veteran Member
I didn't know I'd told you about that issue.
Secret Chief
Veteran Member
{ checks dictionary for 'fun' }
I didn't know I'd told you about that issue.
That issue or that tissue?
Interesting, but I do not believe this addresses the problem of using the anecdotal description of evolution as a "fact." The use is a bit misleading.
Is it? Why?
The proper definition of a 'fact' is objective verifiable evidence that does not change. The sciences Evolution change and evolve with newknowledge. The misuse of the term gives those that reject evolution a crack to justify their objections.
The sciences of evolution is NOT a "fact." You may say the sciences of evolution are "fact" based.
Last edited:
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Evolution in the sense of changes of allele freqency and other measures is a fact, the science or theory is not, This is only relevant when arguing with deniers.
Banach-Tarski Paradox
*Banned*
More Than Birds (Extreme Parody) | A Capella Science
Banach-Tarski Paradox
*Banned*
Evo-Devo (Despacito Biology Parody) | A Capella Science
Banach-Tarski Paradox
*Banned*
CRISPR-Cas9 ("Mr. Sandman" Parody) | A Capella Science
Banach-Tarski Paradox
*Banned*
It might be useful to have material on evolution in other fields, not just biology.
Much of the anti-evolutionary rhetoric that one reads online is directed towards the social sciences.
OK, you described an observed fact supporting evolution in bold. Other measures may be considered facts.
I believe the use of fact should not refer to evolution as a whole. Actually I prefer to refer to the 'Sciences of Evolution' and not the old phrase 'Theory of evolution, because evolution over time has become involved with a number of theories and hypotheses from different fields of science.
I prefer to refer to the 'Sciences of Evolution' and not the old term Theory of Evolution.
Banach-Tarski Paradox
*Banned*
I like the term “evolution”, plain and simple.
Things change in dynamical systems.
That’s what evolution means.
And evolution is simply a fact (or an operator or whatever) for anything that changes over time.
Things change.
Unless they don’t, in which case either it doesn’t evolve, or it’s evolution is completely boring. (Take your pick,)
Religion changes over time, so religion evolves.
Culture changes over time, so culture evolves.
Mathematics changes over time, so mathematics evolves,
Hell, even biological systems change over time, so we evolve.
I’m more evolved today than I was yesterday, because I’ve changed.
Evolution itself is not a difficult concept.
It’s only when we get into the details of special casss that it gets complicated.
What do you see as justification? Evolution is just biology, after all.