• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

OnlyFans - yay or nay?

OnlyFans

  • Morally good/acceptable

    Votes: 6 19.4%
  • Morally bad/unacceptable

    Votes: 6 19.4%
  • Morally neutral; I don't care

    Votes: 19 61.3%

  • Total voters
    31

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I am generalizing, because it is the high majority of male participation that allows these businesses to function. I do imagine that these men most likely want a good relationship and want to be better fathers or husbands, but they have an addiction which demeans them. Like any drug, succumbing to the addiction doesn't mean they don't love their wives, but they are certainly not respecting women, their wives, or their daughters by attending strip clubs and feeding their addiction. They are certainly not looking at women as a human beings while their job is to seduce them by undressing and dancing. It sounds like you think I'm over-exaggerating the harmful effects of sex addictions and dehumanization, but I'm am not.
I have a weakness for addictions. I was a heavy smoker for 2 years, until I couldn't afford to buy cigs. I have never, ever, gone into a strip club or visited onlyfans -- probably because they are expensive. I've thought about it many times. I've looked at porn online. I know what addiction is, and I know how futile and stupid it is to pursue empty desires. It feels like defeat.

A desire can become its own creature in your mind and can even speak to you. Its a roaming thing which masquerades as your own will but isn't.

Yes, its mostly men who patronize these institutions. Its an exercise in frustration, but I think its not as bad as a drug, except for perhaps a small number of people. There could be some people who are ruined by it, like in that song "House of the Rising Sun."

For religiously married men it certainly is a mistake, since they don't believe they should. For them it is a sin, a real stupid mistake and something which they will feel ashamed of. Their partner may also feel the same about it. Jealousies may also be aroused, and jealousy is one of the snakes of marriage.

I brought up that it was demeaning to many men. For some people that may not be the case. Some may not have problems. Some people have very strong wills and aren't indecisive. They do what they intend to do. There aren't many people like that, but there are some. All of their desires are part of their uniform will and subject to it. They don't go back and forth deciding whether to overeat or to do a task.

It has ended peoples entire lives. As for society, it promotes objectification, that can lead to sex crimes, child abuse, neglect, and most likely divorce or broken families. I worked as a therapist for a behavioral facility for youth and I couldn't believe how young at which these issues take hold of someone's life. Most of the time it is because a parent or relative brought it into their home. But ignorance is bliss I suppose for the "healthy" ones who can manage their sexual urges and still find joy with their families. I tend to doubt it. I just pray that my daughter doesn't feel the effect of this invisible pandemic.
I don't think so. I think that more problems in marriage come from within that marriage. The strip club can only be a spark, and if there is no tender then there is no fire. The nature of marriage is one in which two individuals have to make peace, because they aren't naturally at peace. Men and women don't talk the same way, think the same way. People always have internal problems which become exposed through intimacy, and this brings trouble with it. If things are out of balance then it only takes a spark to start a fire, but life is full of sparks. There are all kinds of silly reasons, silly moments that end marriages. Sometimes its a misunderstanding which does it in.
 

Meow Mix

Chatte Féministe
I appreciate you elaborating more of your story even though you didn't need to. I consider myself a good judge of character and yours is definitely not in question. I just want to say that healthiness is subjective to ones environment just like Utah, where I live, is filled with smog and I am most likely affected by it but don't realize it until someone from Oregon visits and gets emphysema after a couple days. You suggesting there is an atmosphere of tolerance to 'objectification' because it is so prevalent in today's society (restaurants, movies, ads,) and there are somewhat decent men who are participating is odd to me and it doesn't make me breathe easy, in fact it furthers the lie that it even has a place other than immoral. I don't have to tell you who *cough* (men) are benefiting mostly from it, but I did want to address the morality aspect.

I think there is a distinction between insidious, culturewide objectification (advertisements, catcalling, entitlement to time/conversation/not accepting “no” as an answer, etc.) and the conceptually necessary aspect of objectification inherent in something like an entertainment or service industry.

I agree the former is always bad, mainly benefits men at the expense of women, and leads to people forming unhealthy mental pictures of how to think about and treat women.

The latter can be healthy though: we objectify the ballerina because she dances for us, we objectify the bartender because she’s there to sling us drinks, and so on: it’s inherent in what these activities and jobs do that they are a person performing a function for our entertainment and edification: but we can be healthy, reasonable humans and see there is a person doing the job. It takes some kind of pre-existing problem not to see the person (perhaps because of the former kind of objectification?)

Unfortunately, there is no gray to this, there is only black and white. I'm a man. As such, I don't walk into a gentleman's club to act like a gentleman as odd as it sounds.

No doubt, but so? This is what I was saying: it is possible for people to simply enter a strip club, enjoy drinks with their friends, enjoy the entertainment, and leave simply thinking that it was an enjoyable time. I daresay that’s how a majority of it went.

It may depend on location, but the people I saw were largely people that stayed after lunch (one of the clubs had a full kitchen, it was actually awesome. The wings were bomb) because they were drinking now and why leave? Bachelor parties, straight girls being ironic/funny (or maybe curious, who knows), business people (seriously), regulars that lived nearby and treated it mostly like a local dive bar. Lots of couples, perhaps trying to add a little spice (go home after and use that energy, basically). You’d get people that did come in alone and that’s where the ******** came from (but even then those were a minority of loners!)

It can just be harmless, dumb fun. Just like a motorcycle can be harmless, dumb fun. Some people choose to weave motorcycles in and out of traffic dangerously and that ruins lives, does that mean we should judge all motorcycle enthusiasts? I think the same applies here: there will always be ******** that ruin others’ fun by not being responsible and lighthearted about something, or addicts that need help (these I feel empathy for, the ******** I don’t).

BTW Gentleman's club was term used mostly for wives who wanted to think their husbands were doing something fraternal but instead they were mostly looking at other women. Such a misnomer! I think it's only crafty men that made you think they are seeing women as "people" but in reality they often go home to their wife or girlfriend and see her less as a person, bringing them back to the club the next night. It's a vicious toxin that's invisible. I mean and we're only talking about the legal stuff, which is a fine line from sex trafficking and the illegal stuff. The statistics are crazy to ignore. But again, I'm not directing any of this to you or your past. I'm glad that you found your value which we all have to do and the fact you are on a religious forum speaks for itself. I just wanted to express my concern about the seen and unseen dangers of 'objectification' because it has caused so much more pain than good for society.

I don’t think your heart’s in the wrong place at all, I’m glad to see this kind of energy against objectification <3

I just think there are nuances. Stripping and OF aren’t for everybody, certainly; but they are for some people. I found so much of my confidence by doing this. Now maybe I would have found it another way, but I guess I’m just saying that I don’t see any problem with how I did. (I know this wasn’t about me at this point, just adding my anecdote).
 

Friend of Mara

Active Member
Do you think OnlyFans is morally acceptable?

Not a legal debate, but a moral one.

I think it's immoral.
I put neutral but probably lean towards good. There is nothing inherently wrong with sex work and onlyfans was a successful site for people to make money off of.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Do you think OnlyFans is morally acceptable?

Not a legal debate, but a moral one.

I think it's immoral.
I've heard of it, but have never seen it.
And I'm pretty certain that I've no personal pix or videos on it.
I voted <morally neutral>.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I have never, ever, gone into a strip club or visited onlyfans....
Back in college, some friends & I went to a strip club.
Mostly unattractive disinterested sweaty women
gyrating strangely. I never went back...& not just
because it burned down the next day.
The Anchor Inn it was called.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
In the end I vote bad. Families are fragile, and I think that families should be a place where trust and ease are common. Its a wonderful thing to grow up in a family where everybody trusts and believes in each other, but it is a fragile situation so easily messed up.

Not very bad though. A lot of families have much bigger problems already. There are so many things to be concerned about: many things that can make families be places where trust and ease are lost. If you can't have peace in your family, then what's the point in microfocusing on small influences.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Do you think OnlyFans is morally acceptable?

Not a legal debate, but a moral one.

I think it's immoral.
Amoral. I don't care about it. I don't see it differently from any other type of sexwork.

However, I would advice anyone against it. Big money in the short term, but pretty much labeled for life.
By engaging in such "work", you burn quite a few social bridges. Especially in the romantic department.

People need to realize that the interwebs are pretty much "forever".
Once you put yourself out there, it's close to impossible to be forgotten and "start over".
 
Top