PureX
Veteran Member
I know, that's why I asked.Ðanisty said:The OP didn't ask if it was any of our business.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I know, that's why I asked.Ðanisty said:The OP didn't ask if it was any of our business.
Yes, I've noted that most of the replies were based on personal and anecdotal opinion. As is appropriate.Ðanisty said:I kind of got the impression that it wasn't really what Mercy Not Sacrifice wanted to know. In other words, I know it's none of my business what other people do, but I still have an opinion to share.
Well...it's not...until someone clicks the Reply button and puts his business on the internet for the world to see.PureX said:What business is it of mine/ours, what other people do regarding their intimate relationships?
opensoul7 said:I voted , like everything they have many pros and cons.
And also like everything the morality is for the individual to decide .That kind of "open" relationship is not for me personally , but may work well for someone else. My idea of "open" is more along the lines of being completely honest with my significant other about all aspects of my life and beliefs. I do however know a few people who swing and are happy and secure in their relationships.
In an open relationship maybe being the 'bit on the side' will become redundant. How about "leftovers", with wifey/hubby the main menu item?Pardus said:I have had some experience here, not been in one myself, but have been the bit on the side.
In general, not many people are mature enough to handle it, and most who could handle it are too mature for it.
CaptainXeroid said:I find people screwing around in engaging in group sex because they lack self control over their sexual urges to be thoroughly repugnant.
Mercy Not Sacrifice said:What's your take on open relationships--intimate relationships where the couple (or group, perhaps) is allowed to seek other partners at will and without fault?
No, it's not bizarre at all.Rough_ER said:What a bizarre statement.
Um...no it doesn't. In fact, it's not even close. I can see that we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I value the choice I have made to honor my marriage vows by remaining monogamous. I realize not everyone is able to do that.Rough_ER said:This suggests that everybody's deepest desire is to engage in group sex...
CaptainXeroid said:No, it's not bizarre at all.
Um...no it doesn't. In fact, it's not even close. I can see that we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I value the choice I have made to honor my marriage vows by remaining monogamous. I realize not everyone is able to do that.
CaptainXeroid said:I realize not everyone is able to do that.