But that doesn't make it true. They say themselves in the article that does agree with the theory that it has not been proven to increase pregnancy.
And do not attack me just because you have a problem with what I posted. I simply said there is still controversy over it. And not only that but gave a link to both sides. Did you read it? IT STILL HAS NOT BEEN PROVEN TO INCREASE PREGNANY. Both articles state the same thing. You even have it up yourself that both articles say it hasn't been proven wether or not it increases pregnancy.
From the article I linked to in post # 2
"The doctor concluded that female orgasms pull sperm closer to the egg as well.
Yet, it was only three years ago that two British biologists, Robin Baker and Mark Bellis, tested the so-called upsuck hypothesis.
They discovered that when a woman climaxes any time between a minute before to 45 minutes after her lover ejaculates, she retains significantly more sperm than she does after nonorgasmic sex. When her orgasm precedes her male's by more than a minute, or when she does not have an orgasm, little sperm is retained. Just as the doctors' letters suggested decades earlier, the team's results indicated that muscular contractions associated with orgasm pull sperm from the vagina to the cervix, where it's in better position to reach an egg."
Now, do you have results that a female orgasm
doesn't pull sperm from the vagina to the cervix, where it's in better position to reach an egg? If not then we have to go with what results we have:
Muscular contractions associated with orgasm pull sperm from the vagina to the cervix, where it's in better position to reach an egg.
Think that sperm in a less advantageous position has an equal or better chance of fertilizing an egg? The article addressed this very point when the researchers found that women use orgasms, consciously or not, to control fertilization.