Dude, I
know all this. See the religion? Same as yours. I may be young into the religion, but I know all this. I know the swastika is not a symbol of wickedness, and I am aware of this. I wasn't trying to say it was. I've explained it for you below later on, so maybe you will understand what I meant.
Not really, no: they just kept the flag. To say that it means Islam is a militant and expansionist religion because they kept a flag seems a bit.. meh.
The Wahhabis usually use the Shahada, usually on a black or green background, and often with a sword.
I think you missed the point. I will explain it again:
Just because people do things in the name of something doesn't mean that is what the religion is. Just because the Star and Crescent became widely used because of Ottoman influence doesn't mean Islam is to blame.
Saying that a religion is violent because of what people do in its name is illogical and is like saying that Sanatana, Jain and Buddha Dharma are violent and should be blamed for the swastika, which the Nazis did cruel things under, when we know that the swastika is not a symbol of violence, nor are the paths of ahimsa to blame for what Nazis did who stole the symbol (and I am
not saying they are, I'm trying to illustrate a point, but it seemed to have gone over your head
) - you are doing guilt by association and are guilty of logical fallacies.
By the way, have you read the rules of the forum?
I know you're new here, but please read and abide by them.
Hope this helps.