• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Over Five Hundred People Witnessed The Resurrection Of Jesus Christ

joelr

Well-Known Member
No heretical texts exist from that time?
It's known the church took over pagan churches to make Christian churches. The 2nd century was at least 50% Gnostic, there were over 40 Gospels and 20 Acts.
But once the church was fully established, yes it was heretical to have anything but the canon. This is why the Dead Sea scrolls were hidden, you would be killed for it.

There was one Gospel being written, a "sayings" of Jesus being copied from another philosopher and in the middle of the text it was suddenly hidden.
Besides what we recovered there is a black hole of information for the early period. We don't get to hear much from opposing writers.
The 4 Gospels survived because Bishop Irenaeus, late 2nd century was calling for a power structure where only specific people could read and teach/interpret the scripture, with Bishops, priests and so on. He hated the Gnostics and was first to mention a four Gospel tradition.

Later in Rome they also adopted this and in 385 it became law. Other versions were punishable. If you read the letters of Irenaeus he clearly wanted power. That is why those Gospels survived. Everything else eventually became heretical.

Before him was the Marcion canon and he swore by a longer version of Luke. So it's completely subjective.

The 2nd century looked more like this:


"These various interpretations were called heresies by the leaders of the proto-orthodox church, but many were very popular and had large followings. Part of the unifying trend in proto-orthodoxy was an increasingly harsh anti-Judaism and rejection of Judaizers. Some of the major movements were:

In the middle of the second century, the Christian communities of Rome, for example, were divided between followers of Marcion, Montanism, and the gnostic teachings of Valentinus."

Frankly Justin Martyr's apologetic text is something you are talking about. He claims Jesus is just like all the Greek demigods, and lists many ways. He just then says the devil went back in time to influence these writers to create similar stories to fool Christians. At the time it was like "oh, ok, yeah, Satan was trying to fool us, way to go Justin!" But it's really an admission by someone who grew up Greek that it's a representation of typical Hellenistic culture.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
Maybe you’re right, maybe all the authors of the Bible are fictitious.
Some are. Depends on who.
The Gospels authors are at least unknown.

There is too much evidence to get into. External and internal. There are also minority opinions. Each NT historical scholar gets into some of it. All gathered here:


Why Scholars Doubt the Traditional Authors of the Gospels


 
Top