Huh what? Do you know what a Hadith is or not? Hadiths are sayings describing history its not revelation.
My question is why is it you hold hadiths to the standard of revelation. That is something I find quite bizzarre.
When you perform salah do you recite Tashahhud? Did you know you commit shirk when you do so as you are using Muhammad to intercede on your prayers which deifies him.
You say
اللهم صل على محمد وعلى آل محمد، كما صليت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم، وبارك على محمد وعلى آل محمد، كما باركت على إبراهيم
وعلى آل إبراهيم، في العالمين إنك حميد مجيد.
Most of Tasha'hud places blessings on Muhammad and Ibrahhim. Placing blessings on a dead man is shirk because a prophet or rasul is just a man. Muhammad is not to be glorified like the Christ of the Christians. You glorify Allah by using the name of Muhammad. So the validity of ahadith are extremely shaky. Oral traditions passed down which are Traditions only mean absolutely nothing. Tradition and salvation are not the same. Acceptance of hadiths is just tradition, it is religious law to only those who are traditionalists.
Surat Az-Sumar ayat 43 "Or have they taken intercessors besides Allah? Say what, even though they did not ever have control over anything, nor do they understand."
Surah Al-Anam verse 70 and Al-Muddaththir ayat 48 also back this up. By following hadith you are often going against Quran.
Yes there are hadith that do not conflict with the Quran but would you seriously trust the words passed on to generation and generation that are not of revealed scripture or would you just go straight to the only relevant source?