• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Palestinians under attack

CMike

Well-Known Member
IF this baby was a western or jew ,it's would be big impact in the NEWS and condemned

since his parents are Arabic/Muslims , who cares .
Perhaps then the Hamas governmeng shouldn't use him as a human shield.

I care.

I blame Hamas.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
And a big clue that Israelis care more about Paletinian children than the leaders of Hamas is that all that cement they imported went to build tunnels to attack Israelis instead of building shelters to protect their own children. On top of that, roughly 180 children died in the construction of the tunnels.
 

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
Perhaps then the Hamas governmeng shouldn't use him as a human shield.

I care.

I blame Hamas.

EDITED :

so slaying the civilians because this accusation is not funny .

let's suppose that right woud be blamed but, the blame is on Israeli army more than Hamas .

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (they areArabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .
 
Last edited:

Levite

Higher and Higher
EDITED :

so slaying the civilians because this accusation is not funny .

let's suppose that right woud be blamed but, the blame is on Israeli army more than Hamas .

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (they areArabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .

Ridiculous. Israel tries hard to avoid civilian casualties: if it cannot, it doesn't matter what their ancestry is, only that they are being cruelly used by terrorists to hide behind while the terrorists try to strike at Israel. Israel can't let itself be attacked at will anytime unscrupulous villains procure innocents to hide behind.
 

Godobeyer

the word "Islam" means "submission" to God
Premium Member
Ridiculous. Israel tries hard to avoid civilian casualties: if it cannot, it doesn't matter what their ancestry is, only that they are being cruelly used by terrorists to hide behind while the terrorists try to strike at Israel. Israel can't let itself be attacked at will anytime unscrupulous villains procure innocents to hide behind.

since you did not clearly deny this :

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (because they were Arabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .

, it's not ridiculous , it's painful truth :)
 

Levite

Higher and Higher
since you did not clearly deny this :

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (because they were Arabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .

, it's not ridiculous , it's painful truth :)

Try reading again. That is the exact opposite of what I said.
 

CMike

Well-Known Member
EDITED :

so slaying the civilians because this accusation is not funny .

let's suppose that right woud be blamed but, the blame is on Israeli army more than Hamas .

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (they areArabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .
I can't respond, because I don't understand what you are trying to say.

English please?
 

CMike

Well-Known Member
since you did not clearly deny this :

so ,the type of human shield is make the different (because they were Arabs/Muslims)so it's legal for Israeli army to bomb them ,IF they were western or jews , Israel army would not bombing them .

, it's not ridiculous , it's painful truth :)
Trying to understand here...

The scenerio would never happen.

If Hamas took over a jewish city they would murder all the jews. There would be no jews left to have a human shield with.
 
Last edited:

Levite

Higher and Higher
Trying to understand here...

The scenerio would never happen.

If Hamas took over a jewish city they would murder all the jews. There would be no jews let to have a human shield with.

Also a good point, yes.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
You could accuse your enemy of using civilians as human shields if the presence of civilians prevented you from engaging with them.

If the presence of civilians is not sufficient to stop you from engaging with the enemy, then the civilians are civilian casualties, not human shields.

Seems pretty obvious to me,
 

CMike

Well-Known Member
You could accuse your enemy of using civilians as human shields if the presence of civilians prevented you from engaging with them.

If the presence of civilians is not sufficient to stop you from engaging with the enemy, then the civilians are civilian casualties, not human shields.

Seems pretty obvious to me,

They are civilians that are being used as human shields.

That is pretty obvious to me.

Also, the enemy themselves state that they use their own civilians as human shields.

However, Israel has to still do what they need to in order to protect their own civilians as any country would.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
They are civilians that are being used as human shields.

That is pretty obvious to me.

Also, the enemy themselves state that they use their own civilians as human shields.

However, Israel has to still do what they need to in order to protect their own civilians as any country would.

The only thing Israel can do to protect it's citizens is make peace. War with the Arab world can not be won in the long term. That you actually beleive that you are 'forced to kill their children' proves that hope for Israel is lost.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
War with the Arab world can not be won in the long term.

Yeah been hearing that ever since 1948.
Its always impossible to beat them and then they get beaten.

War isnt some computer game where you build more units than your enemy and win because of it.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Yeah been hearing that ever since 1948.
Its always impossible to beat them and then they get beaten.

War isnt some computer game where you build more units than your enemy and win because of it.

Yes and Israel has been in conflict with it's neighbours since 48, so clearly winning does not actually make Israel safer. A pyrrhic victory is no victory at all.

You are correct, war is not a video game - as Clauswitz said, it is politics by any other means.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
Yes and Israel has been in conflict with it's neighbours since 48, so clearly winning does not actually make Israel safer. A pyrrhic victory is no victory at all.

You are correct, war is not a video game - as Clauswitz said, it is politics by any other means.

1948
War with Lebanon
War with Syria
War with Jordan
War with Egypt


2014
Ceasefire with Lebanon and Hezbollah is martyring itself in Syria
Syria chose self destruct without getting Golan back
Peace with Jordan
Peace with Egypt

Yeah i see what you mean. What an horrible outlook.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
1948
War with Lebanon
War with Syria
War with Jordan
War with Egypt


2014
Ceasefire with Lebanon and Hezbollah is martyring itself in Syria
Syria chose self destruct without getting Golan back
Peace with Jordan
Peace with Egypt

Yeah i see what you mean. What an horrible outlook.


Peace WITH your neighbours is possible, peace FROM your neighbours is not.
The region is far more unstable now than it was then, so what are you winning?
 
Last edited:

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
The region is far more unstable now than it was then, so what are you winning?

The region? They are really occupied with killing each other.

I mean yeah of course ISIS has these grand plans to conquer the entire Levant with... their camels and Kalashnikovs but this is still real life and not the Arab expansion redux.


They just arent going to sweep through Jordan and suddenly arrive at the border of the Westbank where the IDF soldiers start to cry, kill themselves and/or convert to Islam.

Just because Lebanon, Syria and Sunni Iraq are a mess doesnt mean the mess will spread to not so retarded countries.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
The region? They are really occupied with killing each other.

I mean yeah of course ISIS has these grand plans to conquer the entire Levant with... their camels and Kalashnikovs but this is still real life and not the Arab expansion redux.


They just arent going to sweep through Jordan and suddenly arrive at the border of the Westbank where the IDF soldiers start to cry, kill themselves and/or convert to Islam.

Just because Lebanon, Syria and Sunni Iraq are a mess doesnt mean the mess will spread to not so retarded countries.

History teaches us otherwise.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
Flankerl

Don't get me wrong, I want peace in the middle east and a prosperous and equitable Israel. The problem is that a military approach can only lead to further radicalisation. Ultimately a political solution is the only solution.
 

Andras

Member
I have considered for years that Israel was as much the red-headed stepchild of the U.S. and the U.K as North Korea is to China
 
Top