• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Parkland, Nikolas Cruz, and the Death Penalty

The Parkland jury rejected the death penalty, recommending instead life with no chance of parole.

  • I support the recommendation.

  • I do not support the recommendation.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
From the NPR article: A jury recommends life in prison for Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz

Speaking to the press after the verdict, family members of the victims expressed anger and frustration.

"I am disgusted with our legal system. I am disgusted with those jurors," said Ilan Alhadeff, the father of victim Alyssa Alhadeff. "That you can allow 17 dead and 17 others shot and wounded and not give the death penalty. What do we have the death penalty for? What is the purpose of it? You set a precedent today. You set a precedent for the next mass killing, that nothing happens to you. You'll get life in jail. I'm sorry – that is not OK. As a country we need to stand up and say that's not OK!"

"I pray that that animal suffers every day of his life in jail. And he should have a short life," Alhadeff added.

Cruz carried out the massacre on Valentine's Day in 2018. He was 19 at the time, and had been expelled from the school. He entered a school building through an unlocked side door and used an AR-15-style rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members, as well as wound 17 others.​

Hence the poll ...
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
From the NPR article: A jury recommends life in prison for Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz

Speaking to the press after the verdict, family members of the victims expressed anger and frustration.

"I am disgusted with our legal system. I am disgusted with those jurors," said Ilan Alhadeff, the father of victim Alyssa Alhadeff. "That you can allow 17 dead and 17 others shot and wounded and not give the death penalty. What do we have the death penalty for? What is the purpose of it? You set a precedent today. You set a precedent for the next mass killing, that nothing happens to you. You'll get life in jail. I'm sorry – that is not OK. As a country we need to stand up and say that's not OK!"

"I pray that that animal suffers every day of his life in jail. And he should have a short life," Alhadeff added.

Cruz carried out the massacre on Valentine's Day in 2018. He was 19 at the time, and had been expelled from the school. He entered a school building through an unlocked side door and used an AR-15-style rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members, as well as wound 17 others.​

Hence the poll ...
I still say the victims family and friends should decide his fate one way or the other. Not a jury panel composed of strangers.
 

Jayhawker Soule

-- untitled --
Premium Member
Because whether the person stays in jail, or death penalty. It's all paid for by us (taxpayer). The fiscally responsible thing is to go the cheaper route.
So, from your perspective, the issue is neither ethical nor evidential but, rather, simply one of cost accounting.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
So, from your perspective, the issue is neither ethical nor evidential but, rather, simply one of cost accounting.

Moral/ethical accounting is still cost accounting too.

I gave a pragmatic answer and also said one way or the other, I go back and forth (life/death).

What good does killing another do? But make us murderers as well right?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Too much emotion involved that way for justice to be appropriately served. It must be blind and w/o emotion.
For something that heinous and horrible, I'd gladly give the victims priority in deciding for themselves. Maybe a proper cooldown period before passing their judgment would be appropriate.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
For something that heinous and horrible, I'd gladly give the victims priority in deciding for themselves. Maybe a proper cooldown period before passing their judgment would be appropriate.

No cool down is long enough to be an appropriate time to null the void left by the death of a child or family member.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
I voted that I do not support the recommendation and imo the punishment should be death,it’s beyond doubt he committed the crime,you reap what you sow,the hard part is who pulls the trigger,presses the syringes or pulls the lever.

It can be argued that the death penalty will not bring the victims back but it will bring some closer to the families imo.
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
Far better to simple sit back, establish the average daily cost to feed the prisoner, estimate the number of days in prison, adjust for inflation, ...

Seriously, do you hear yourself?

Of course I do. The Justice system is not the place for emotion to reign supreme. It's a time for cool heads and level thoughts.
 
Top