Noaidi
slow walker
no but keep going.
I think the idea is that ALL religions are made up - Pastafarianism included. Like any other religion, can you disprove Pastafarianism? Can you think of any religion that hasn't been made up or invented?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
no but keep going.
I guess it would be kind of like how AA views god. They see god as one's 'higher-power' and for them to personify their god to something that they are comfortable with. Many people in AA will deny this, of course, but I've seen it referenced many times.
Some people have a hard time grasping a god that shares NONE of their personality or moralities. By personifying their diety, they feel closer and after some time they forget that it was themselves that gave their god the qualities that it possesses.
Why anybody would want to relate to a flying mass of pasta is beyond me, but hey, who am I to judge lol.
I think the idea is that ALL religions are made up. Can you think of any religion that hasn't been made up or invented?
Can you? quote]
No. That's the point.
As for the Invisible Pink Unicorn, I think the parody is hillarious. They give it all of the qualities that non-theists(specifically the ones that 'troll') hate about dieties.
I think the idea is that ALL religions are made up - Pastafarianism included. Like any other religion, can you disprove Pastafarianism? Can you think of any religion that hasn't been made up or invented?
ALL of the qualities that they give the unicorn NO major religion gives to their dieties! I mean its rediculous....
indeed but they make no sense, ALL of the qualities that they give the unicorn NO major religion gives to their dieties! I mean its rediculous....
In actuallity it is impossible to know, as we weren't there during their conception. It is impossible to prove ANY theory true or false and that goes for scientific concepts also.
Surely a religion doesn't give qualities to it's deities, but instead the deities have those qualities which the religion acknowledges. If we give qualities to our deities, that could imply that we are creating them as we want them to be.
Surely a religion doesn't give qualities to it's deities, but instead the deities have those qualities which the religion acknowledges. If we give qualities to our deities, that could imply that we are creating them as we want them to be.
I agree, but we can have an idea about whether some concepts are more plausible than others. To me, Pastafarianism is as equally valid as christianity, islam, pink unicorn etc.
I agree with you agreement lol
true I used the wrong wording excuse me, the point is merely making your thing ridulously illogical and slapping the name God onto it doesnt make every other God concept out their illogical, however Athiests tend to believe it is and its a little sad
I agree, but we can have an idea about whether some concepts are more plausible than others. To me, Pastafarianism is as equally valid as christianity, islam, pink unicorn etc.
I agree with your agreement. So we're agreed. Agreed?
thats stupid logical immpossibilities cannot exist the flying spegetti monster and pink unicorn have logical fallacies thrown about them so they cannot exist.
thats stupid logical immpossibilities cannot exist the flying spegetti monster and pink unicorn have logical fallacies thrown about them so they cannot exist.
Who's to say a God didn't make the FSM to make us lol. That all is highly illogical as you say though lol. I'm not debating, I'm just having good fun.