Jumi
Well-Known Member
It's always easy to dig for dirt in the trashbins if one doesn't care too much.One way to correct the pastor's views.
He will be using the correct pronouns in no time flat! Yes ma'am!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It's always easy to dig for dirt in the trashbins if one doesn't care too much.One way to correct the pastor's views.
He will be using the correct pronouns in no time flat! Yes ma'am!
"Bruce Jenner is still a man" are "the Bible's words?"
Should his congregation adapt this for the comfort of their minister?
Rom 14:4:
Who are you to pass judgment on another's servant? Before his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand.
Stemming from similar tradition, Iran had an interesting take on that, what if the body is only a shell and the soul is in the wrong body? What many Christians seem to be saying is that the body dictates everything about "souls". It is certainly an interesting take also, if not very helpful.If you look at the Bible it does not talk about Jenner in it self. But according to what sex a person are born as even they change the outside, does not change the inside or the spirit as they call it in christian faith. Body is only a shell that contain the soul.
View attachment 26525
The above transphobic sign got Pastor Justin Hoke of the Trinity Bible Presbyterian Church in deep trouble with his congregation.
He put the sign up sometime around December 31st. In less than two weeks, he was out of a job. His congregation was disgusted with him and they rebelled almost to a person. Every couple in his church -- except one -- declared they would leave the Church if Hoke stayed on as Pastor.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/14/pastor-fired-caitlyn-jenner-man-sign/
Is the response to Hoke's sign a "sign of the times" (pun shamelessly intended)?
Questions? Comments?
I guess that would depend on whether you see Christianity as a living, evolving tradition, or as a fossilized relic of an ancient age.
I am glad we no longer live for any "fossilized relic of an ancient age."
God help us where we go next.
View attachment 26525
The above transphobic sign got Pastor Justin Hoke of the Trinity Bible Presbyterian Church in deep trouble with his congregation.
He put the sign up sometime around December 31st. In less than two weeks, he was out of a job. His congregation was disgusted with him and they rebelled almost to a person. Every couple in his church -- except one -- declared they would leave the Church if Hoke stayed on as Pastor.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/14/pastor-fired-caitlyn-jenner-man-sign/
Is the response to Hoke's sign a "sign of the times" (pun shamelessly intended)?
Questions? Comments?
I'd love to see where you think the Bible says all that.If you look at the Bible it does not talk about Jenner in it self. But according to what sex a person are born as even they change the outside, does not change the inside or the spirit as they call it in christian faith. Body is only a shell that contain the soul.
So you agree that the minister was acting contrary to the advice of the Bible.It was wrong of the pastor to write it yes, because he judge Jenner.
IIRC, the Presbyterian Church is pretty careful about following the Bible's advice on how to resolve internal disputes.The congregation should follow the bible not the words of others.
Or maybe he could have concentrated on the issues that Jesus emphasized in the Gospels and followed that example for his ministry. It would be a lot more honest than picking some issue that the minister feels strongly about and playing this pareidolia game to try to pull some imagined position of Jesus out of the Bible.As a priest/pastor he should maybe kept his view within the church and only teach the words written in the bible.
He obviously thinks God hasn't changed [his] mind about slavery, talking to menstruating women, cutting your beard and so on. So yes, he's not just a bigot, he's an incompetent bigot.The above transphobic sign got Pastor Justin Hoke of the Trinity Bible Presbyterian Church in deep trouble with his congregation.
I'd love to see where you think the Bible says all that.
In fact, there are passages (e.g. Galatians 3:23) that I've seen Christians use to argue that the soul is genderless.
So you agree that the minister was acting contrary to the advice of the Bible.
IIRC, the Presbyterian Church is pretty careful about following the Bible's advice on how to resolve internal disputes.
Or maybe he could have concentrated on the issues that Jesus emphasized in the Gospels and followed that example for his ministry. It would be a lot more honest than picking some issue that the minister feels strongly about and playing this pareidolia game to try to pull some imagined position of Jesus out of the Bible.
That is true. More and more people see Christianity as old and outdated. But even as a Buddhist i do not disagree with Christianity on many levels. But see the answer to the question in this OP a bit different then Christians do. But since it is about Christianity i chose to answer in that context and not as a buddhist with somewhat different view of the topic
Do you actually think it's core to Christian spirituality that transgendered folks are morally censured and condemned? Is that your notion of what your religion is all about? Or do you think that aspect of your religion might not be quite core to it?
I would suggest that if you think censuring and condemning transgendered folks is a key and inseparable part of Christianity, you have no grounds to stand on when complaining about the decline of Christian "values" and church attendance in America.
My view is that if people believe in a certain religion, then they might as well follow it. If they don't agree with it or reject certain parts of it, then they might as well reject the whole thing.
On the other hand, sometimes I wonder why some churches seem to focus on relatively innocuous "sins" which harm no one, while all but ignoring many of the larger sins which bring about great harm and misery (such as greed, war, and violence).
My view is that if people believe in a certain religion, then they might as well follow it. If they don't agree with it or reject certain parts of it, then they might as well reject the whole thing.
On the other hand, sometimes I wonder why some churches seem to focus on relatively innocuous "sins" which harm no one, while all but ignoring many of the larger sins which bring about great harm and misery (such as greed, war, and violence).
You quote, "relatively innocuous "sins" which harm no one"
Read my profile tag below.
All these come from the little "no harms" which should have
been called "no goods."
I turned off that feature, so I can't read anyone's signatures. You'll have to tell me what it says.
Recall Lot in Sodom in Genesis? The Sodomites said to the effect
they would punish Lot for judging them. It's happening, promoted
by the very people who told us all this wouldn't happen - just a few
years ago.