How delightful! Are you a farmer[ess] then?
The disciples were following what had been directly learned from Jesus' mouth.
Some of them were yes, but those that followed, no, which I would have thought was plainly obvious.
Paul claims a vision, and tells us he DOES NOT take his teachings from the disciples, WHOM LEARNED FROM JESUS,
Paul met the lord whether you care to admit it or not. There is also spiritual discernment which you also seem to neglect to mention. Perhaps you are not even aware of it, which would explain much if so.
and there are verses showing they were afraid of him, and others showing they did not approve what he was teaching.
Afraid of Paul? No! He went to Yerusalaim, have you fogotten and saw the apostles. Just because some there did not agree, so what. That will always be the case, it does not make him wrong or a liar. There will always be differences in teaching, it is the main core that does not alter.
Says a one eyed woman... haha
The finishing school shut was it?
Before the ONE God Hebrew took over, they had a God and Goddess, and the people said they were better off under that Goddess.
So what?
The ONE God Hebrew took over by hundreds or thousands of years of genocide, against their own people. They murdered those whom didn't want to change Gods, over-and-over-and-over! Read Kings.
That is the nature of Man. That is why we are here. And yet, for all this remonstating, it is YOU, who seems to be advocating women killing in the battle field as well. A hypocritical stance perhaps.
esus says he didn't come to change the law. He was claiming to be the awaited Hebrew Messiah.
Until ''all is fulfilled''. Do you know when it was fulfilled? Do you know why there was a change in the law?
You do not know that Saul/Paul was actually converted.
You know because scripture tells you. If you are not going to accept that part then you cannot accept any of it. If that is the case, how can you argue any of it?
Sounds very bogus when he claims a vision, then does NOT teach what JESUS taught the disciples to preach - and then they end up with a lot of foreign religious ideas tacked in, - like Hell, for instance.
He had a vision, not ''claim'' a vision. He taught as he was taught be the lord himself. Paul did not teach Hell, even though you seem to atribute it to him, seeing this is the post you remonstate about.
Hell is only a fleeting moment.
LOL! YOU obviously don't understand!
I hope you were looking in a mirror when you said that, because if you weren't, you should have been. Puttin LOL in big letters and colouring words does not make you right, even if it keeps you ammused.
