• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

People are being manipulated into hating Muslims

Sabour

Well-Known Member
At your one percent, that is still 15 million Muslims

About that point, it was already discussed with the members.

Even if it were 0.01 %, or is it a 1 person or 15 million muslims, terrorism acts should always be condemned and stood up against.

However, the 1 % is not representivive of islam, be it 1 muslim or 100 million muslims.
 

Adramelek

Setian
Premium Member
Personally, I do not have any hatred toward Muslims or the religion of Islam itself. However, I do hate and despise those who, in the name of Islam, slaughter, burn, behead other people. There is nothing honorable or noble about the murder of the innocent.
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
What is the difference between "can't" and "shouldn't" in the context ?
"Can't" refers to a practical possibility. "Should not" refers to a need or strong convenience.

While it is true that a very high percentage of Muslims does not actually approve of violence, I think that is a bit of an illusory statistic. It is all too easy to convince people to approve of "justified" war or "rebellion". And I don't think generally speaking Muslims have much to show for their tendency to favor peace when given a choice.

I am very willing to be convinced otherwise, though. The world badly needs a return of the Khudai Khidmatgar and similar groups.
 

Theweirdtophat

Well-Known Member
P p


Then why is the Muslim community not speaking out against what other Muslims are doing?

Where have you been?

They have been speaking out against it, but that conveniently doesn't get reported very often. I know some that are against it, people around the world are against it and even other Muslims are fighting against them. Like in Jordan, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates and so forth. Besides I don't recall anyone demanding that every Christian condemn the atrocities of The Lord's Resistance Army, but Muslims are expected to? People say they don't condemn it so loudly that they can't hear the Muslims that are condemning it. So if they don't go out on tv and openly condemn it, that must mean they secretly support it? Is that the people's mentality now?

Doesn't matter because there Muslims that speak out against it, whether it gets reported or not. The whole thing's a scam anyhow and a division scheme that has been happening for years. I don't know why people act like it's new, it's been done before in history.
 

Sabour

Well-Known Member
"Can't" refers to a practical possibility. "Should not" refers to a need or strong convenience.

While it is true that a very high percentage of Muslims does not actually approve of violence, I think that is a bit of an illusory statistic. It is all too easy to convince people to approve of "justified" war or "rebellion". And I don't think generally speaking Muslims have much to show for their tendency to favor peace when given a choice.

I am very willing to be convinced otherwise, though. The world badly needs a return of the Khudai Khidmatgar and similar groups.


Well, one can do with the statistics whatever he wants.

My point was that both groups of people are different in their approach and should be treated differently.

Muslims wanting Islamic ruling is simply like other people wanting democracy. It is a choice of governance method. It is like voting. Of course, the only problem is the word "islamic ruling"

Question muslims intentions as much as you like Luis. Say that muslims will favor war over peace as much as you like. I got tired of these statements and opinions on RF. But I assure you that true muslims are the most friendly people you would ever encounter. And they will choose peace over anything, especially the ones that are being oppressed for merely being muslims.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Where have you been?

They have been speaking out against it, but that conveniently doesn't get reported very often.
That is an unfair assessment, IMO.

We all keep hearing (quite properly) about the many Muslims who disapprove and complain in some way or another about ISIS and similar groups. Which is only to be expected, since much of what ISIS does is effectively war and occupation against Muslim territories.

It turns out that Muslims don't traditionally care a whole lot about the disapproval of other Muslims, certainly not to the extent of revising their goals and religious understandings due to the remarks of "foreigners".

No one really expects ISIS to back off because other Muslims repudiate them, among other reasons because that ship has sailed already. ISIS thinks nothing of killing Muslims that disapprove of it.

The end result is that non-Muslims are sort of expected to doubt that ISIS are Muslims in any meaningful sense despite their willingness to kill and die in Islam's name, even as we are also expected to remember and respect the supposedly true Muslim nature of their opponents and victims.

In effect, we have to take sides over a particularly grave disagreement not our own, among a group that has a millenary and often bloody tradition of bitterly accusing its own subgroups of not keeping true to their supposedly shared beliefs.

One can very legitimally ask why we should bother or care when it is so clear that they don't even share a coherent view on the matter to stop drawing blood due to those diverging views.

At the end of the day, ISIS is still a group that makes a point of using Islam's name to justify their views.

Are we expected to assume that they are recruiting in Islam's name and secretly denying it somehow? Because that sure seems to be the standard stance among Muslims who are not supporters of ISIS.

Don't you think that is a bit too much to ask? It is just so much more reasonable to understand that Muslims are plagued by internal conflicts and bitter accusations that, when particularly bitter, often take the form of doubting their adherence to Islam outright.

I know some that are against it, people around the world are against it and even other Muslims are fighting against them. Like in Jordan, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates and so forth. Besides I don't recall anyone demanding that every Christian condemn the atrocities of The Lord's Resistance Army, but Muslims are expected to? People say they don't condemn it so loudly that they can't hear the Muslims that are condemning it. So if they don't go out on tv and openly condemn it, that must mean they secretly support it? Is that the people's mentality now?

Doesn't matter because there Muslims that speak out against it, whether it gets reported or not. The whole thing's a scam anyhow and a division scheme that has been happening for years. I don't know why people act like it's new, it's been done before in history.
If it is a division scam, it began during the lifetime of Muhammad and was started by the early Muslims.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Well, one can do with the statistics whatever he wants.

My point was that both groups of people are different in their approach and should be treated differently.
That is certainly fair enough.

Muslims wanting Islamic ruling is simply like other people wanting democracy. It is a choice of governance method. It is like voting. Of course, the only problem is the word "islamic ruling"
More specifically, it is the theocratic component of it.

Third-partying one's responsibilities to a deity is never a very good idea. Doing so at a national scale that specifically aims towards a global one is basically an intentional disaster.

All people are essentially duty-bound to oppose it.

Question muslims intentions as much as you like Luis.
I will and I do.

Say that muslims will favor war over peace as much as you like.
As it turns out, that is not very much at all.

I don't believe that the average Muslims is at all warlike, and I hoped to have made that clear already.

One tends not to be in doubt about the most obvious general trends of a group of almost two billion people. It is not nearly so much that Muslims generally want war as that they tend to have a hard time understanding the reasons and means to avoid it, particularly when they convince themselves that they are fighting "for God".

I got tired of these statements and opinions on RF. But I assure you that true muslims are the most friendly people you would ever encounter. And they will choose peace over anything, especially the ones that are being oppressed for merely being muslims.

That I am fairly certain of already. Unfortunately, that may easily turn out to make too little of a real difference.
 

Marsh

Active Member
You can't put the two groups under one umbrella. The first group you described will at most be a 1 %.
I'd have to go back to the book to see what percentage Mawaz puts the jihadists at, but I think it is more than 1%. He puts them under the same umbrella because their aims are the same as those seeking change through political means, only their methods are different. Remember, Nawaz was a radical Islamist himself. He was an important recruiter bringing many young teens over to an extremist view of Islam.
 

Marsh

Active Member
Sufism started out as an esoteric reaction to the materialism of the original Sunni Islam but, like Buddhism and other theoretically "peaceful" religions, Sufis became a subset of whatever Sunni School of Islam they followed and, whereas they still try and follow the "inner" teachings of any particular sect, those "inner" teachings may well be violent and destructive to those not of their sect.
And, Baha'i, like the Druze and some other former Shia Muslim sects, do not consider themselves Muslim, nor does the Muslim world consider them Muslim.
And, Jehovah's Witnesses, like most of mainstream believing Christians today, are a recent phenomenon in the Christian world.
The early American colonials invented a new Christianity which, after 400 years, has replaced all mainstream Christian core beliefs with its more tolerant and forgiving Christianity that does not preach forced conversions; hatred of non Christians; and killing those who are not your particular "Flavor of G-d." Again, this was invented by American Colonials and has only recently, mainly after WWII, subsumed the entire mainstream Christian world.
Thanks for the insights. I confess to not knowing much about the Sufi branch of Islam (though I am slowly learning), and the Baha'i I have only recently become familiar with. I do recognize they have strayed too far from Islam to any longer be considered part of that faith. The Witnesses are quite familiar to me as my great grandmother was a member, and I have a number of cousins of that persuasion. Also I have a 'friend' who has been trying to convert me for years -- we've had many long conversations.

You've said that the main core beliefs of all (or most) Christian faiths have changed, and I think I'd generally agree with that, but don't you think that it's secularization we have to thank for that? Maajid Nawaz is attempting to reform Islam from the inside to make the religion more amenable to individual rights and freedoms. His task is an uphill struggle and while I wish him success I am not sure that Islam is at all capable of reforming itself. I wonder what your thoughts are?
 

Moishe3rd

Yehudi
Thanks for the insights. I confess to not knowing much about the Sufi branch of Islam (though I am slowly learning), and the Baha'i I have only recently become familiar with. I do recognize they have strayed too far from Islam to any longer be considered part of that faith. The Witnesses are quite familiar to me as my great grandmother was a member, and I have a number of cousins of that persuasion. Also I have a 'friend' who has been trying to convert me for years -- we've had many long conversations.

You've said that the main core beliefs of all (or most) Christian faiths have changed, and I think I'd generally agree with that, but don't you think that it's secularization we have to thank for that? Maajid Nawaz is attempting to reform Islam from the inside to make the religion more amenable to individual rights and freedoms. His task is an uphill struggle and while I wish him success I am not sure that Islam is at all capable of reforming itself. I wonder what your thoughts are?
My thoughts?
It’s like this:

Jewish history demonstrates that Jews went through about 1,000 years of tribal conquests; bloody sectarian wars; preaching the inferiority of non-Jews; the obligation for Jews to conquer non-Jews; and a whole host of atrocities against non-Jews and, most importantly – Against Each Other!

About 167 BCE, the Jews began a bloody and prolonged sectarian civil war where one faction ended up partially re-establishing the Kingdom of Israel by defeating the Jewish Syrian Greek faction, only to continue brutally fighting against each other over which faction should rule or which faction had the right interpretation of what it meant to be Jewish.
In a pattern of ever shifting alliances and continuing barbarous attacks against each other and, in the end, against their now Roman rulers, 1,400 years after Moses had received the Torah and the Jewish people were established, the Kingdom of Israel was totally annihilated; its population of over 3 million were slaughtered, enslaved or ran away; its Temple destroyed; and the Jewish People were forever dispersed.
Thus ended the Jewish “Reformation.”
And, for the last 2,000 years, Jews have been a shining light to mankind. But getting in getting to that point, they destroyed their world.


The Christian peoples also went through over 1,000 years of - tribal conquests; bloody sectarian wars; preaching the inferiority of non-Christians; the obligation for Christians to conquer non-Christians; and a whole host of atrocities against non-Christians and, most importantly – Against Each Other!

From time of The Roman Church being established in Constantinople, Christianity was barbarous in the extreme to non-Christians; particularly Jews and often Muslims. Christianity invented new tortures and forms of conquest and submission that are known today as extreme forms of sadism.


Somewhere around 1500 CE, European Christians began a bloody and prolonged sectarian civil war where each tribal “State” fought each other over which should rule Europe and which faction has the right interpretation of what it meant to be Christian.
In a pattern of ever shifting alliances and continuing barbarous attacks against each other and, incidental non-Christians such as Jews and non-European civilizations or tribal peoples, approximately 1,600 years after Jesus lived, the continent of Europe was decimated; tens of millions were slaughtered; nearly every kingdom overthrown until the economies were bankrupt and the land destroyed where they could no longer fight their internecine wars.
Thus ended the Christian Reformation.


During this period of time, refugees from this European Christian savagery “colonized” the “New Worlds.”
The early American Christian colonists invented a new theology basically called “Fulfillment Theology” which was opposed to the former theology of the various Churches (Protestant as well as Catholic) which practiced Replacement Theology which was basically the idea that Christians replaced the Jews as G-d’s “Chosen People” and therefore Jews (and all other non-Christians) were to be despised and persecuted.
These early American Christians believed that the Kings of Europe were “Pharaoh;” that the Atlantic Ocean was the “Jordan River;” that America was “the Promised Land;” that the Native American Indians were “the Canaanites;” and that G-d was fulfilling His Promises to Christians to bring them into, what was essentially, Paradise.
Now – this was not a literal belief but a theological belief. It enabled these early American Christians to focus their opprobrium on the insanities of Christian Europe and the Christian history that had “gone astray” and try and begin a new chapter where, although everybody “Should” believe what they believed, they did not have to kill them if they did not. And, they no longer had to despise and persecute the Jews.
Over several centuries and several “Revivals” in America, the rest of the world gradually adopted these beliefs until the 1962-1965, Second Vatican Council, formerly repudiated “Replacement Theology” and acknowledged that the Jews did NOT kill Jesus.


Moving right along –

Islam also went through over 1,000 years of tribal conquests; bloody sectarian wars; preaching the inferiority of non-Muslims; the obligation for Muslims to conquer non-Muslims; and a whole host of atrocities against non-Muslims and, most importantly, as noted, as always – Against Each Other!

Approximately 100 years ago, the last Muslim Empire disintegrated and, Muslims began a bloody and prolonged sectarian civil war where each tribe; sect; cult; faction; “State”; and clan are currently fighting each other over who should rule Islam and which faction has the right interpretation of what it means to be a Muslim.
The bloody and barbarous conquest of the Arabian Peninsula by the Saudi tribe is the precise model for today’s theoretical “Islamic State.”
The establishment of the violent, intolerant Wahhabist heresy by the Saudi tribe, which has replaced normative Sunni Islam, is the precise model for the Iranian Khomeini’s violent, intolerant Shia heresy of Wilayat al-Faqih.


Based on the Jewish and Christian paradigms of the past, the Arab/ Muslim world will continue shift their alliances and continue barbarous attacks – again - Mainly against Each Other!

The attacks against the rest of the non-Muslim or non-Arab world are notches on a “coup stick” or “street cred” for any particular faction to gain adherents in order to kill and conquer fellow Muslims and Arabs.


However, based on previous “Reformations;” in this Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction; this current Arab/ Muslim Reformation will not end until hundreds of millions are dead and portions of the planet left uninhabitable.

Rather than suggesting that Islamic doctrine is inherently violent and unstable, one might posit that certain powers in the Muslim world, specifically Saudi Arabia and Egypt, might find it in their best interests to ameliorate the intolerant and harsh aspects of Muslim theology and focus on some earlier simple fundamentals that do indeed state that those who commit extra-judicial murder or suicide are going to Hell. Or, that the innocent, which includes non-Muslims and women, must be protected from cruelty. Or, that there is no “Jihad” without a Rightly Guided Caliph. Or, a whole host of other very Islamic principles that encourage stability and peace as opposed to destruction and violence.

The alternative is the same massive death and destruction that occurred under the Jewish and Christian “Reformations.”
“If Muslims don’t want to stop destroying the world; ya can’t stop ‘em” is not a useful philosophy.

And, I am certainly open to more useful ideas if anyone has any…
But, we have little time left.
I have not researched this but, it is my opinion that since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Islamist terrorism is increasing exponentially.
It began to impact the non-Muslim, non-Arab world in the 1970’s.

It began to directly affect the US in the 1990’s.
And, it has been destroying the Arab/Muslim world for the last 15 years or so.
I suspect that it will be only a short matter of time before some bright Islamist figures out how to massacre millions of people with some new weapon.
Then what?
 

urbrother

New Member
Of course you are right. As you stated, at one time it was white V Black, etc. I feel that humankind must have something that they see as inferior or as less than themselves in order to feel empowered, and this manifests in the oppression of groups of people deemed as dissimilar to them. At this time, its shifted to the entire Muslim faith, which is clearly erroneous as well as myopic. However, blatant racism continues to plague at least this country insofar as I have seen too many to mention that are openly racist and/or bigoted against various groups.
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
You are awfully close to saying that Islam is not at all a religion or worth of any consideration, you know.
Ah, the voice of fresh air. I agree. So many seem to want to disparage Islam for any reason, even when that reason is false or made of whole cloth. Thank you for your post Luis.
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
Do you even know the message of Islam? Please tell us. Even Muslims will give you conflicting answers.
As will Christians, Jews, and just about every other religion on the planet. There are several forms of Buddhism you realize. Does that mean that the path I follow is wrong or that the message is not that of God, as I conceive of that concept? Too many want to blame Islam and ALL Muslims for the acts of a few. Shall we blame Christianity for the acts of the WBC or that pastor in Florida who attempted to burn all Qu'rans?
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
It would entail the worldwide destruction of the Jews, for one thing. In Islamic eschatology the end times will not arrive until the last Jews are killed. The Koran says that the very rocks will call out to kill a Jew if one attempts to hide behind them.

Similarly, the Bible has its own share of who will be sent to hell through fire, etc, in the book Revelations as well as other books of the NT. Are you trying to say that just the one book leads to a group that seeks world domination? The Bible states that only their faithful with survive and enter the Kingdom of heaven and all others just to enjoy the Lake of Fire. Do you not see the obvious corrolations here? Or do you simply wish to continue to hate one group and one faith?
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
What I do notice, even among very devout Christians, is the claim that those not practicing the same version of Christianity as themselves, are not truly Christian. Thus among many evangelicals, Catholics -- and a whole host of others -- are not true Christians. I see the same as being true among Muslims. Any who claim that the terrorists are not true Muslims are simply so devout they just don't recognize anyone who interprets Islam differently from themselves as being Muslim. That is why ISIS frequently kills Shia Muslims -- they view them as apostates. It is a problem across much of the Muslim world, and because of the nature of the Koran I just don't see any easy solution.

Agreed but don't you think that Islam is still at the same stage in its growth as Christianity was about 500 years ago? The Inquisition. The Burning Times. Etc. How is that any different from what Islam is going through right now?
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
How can "we" unite with a religious philosophy that wants non muslims
DEAD.
Convert or die.
Period.
"WE" will never be united until islam is wiped from the face of the earth.
ALL religions gone.

At least most all other religions don't preach death to non believers.
Google up some information on the religion of peace for cryin' out loud.
What part of we are at WAR with radical islam don't you understand?
Then I assume you want Judaism gone as well, non? Or is your hatred only specific to Islam? You seem to have a rather vehement hatred of Islam, from reading your posts here. What of those Muslims who want peace? And there are a lot of them btw. What of that?
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
I never even brought up the Orlando murders, which itself smells to me.

This world is not messed up as you put it. The only thing messed up about it is people that are messed up. I already know what's going on and I see the same patterns over and over. Muslims aren't and never were the main enemy. They have been used as a scapegoat. You don't believe me now, but there will be a time where you will realize I was right.
IMO, a true voice of reason Phat. thank you.
 

JoStories

Well-Known Member
What is simply not true?
Is this statement your opinion?
You cite nothing to show it isn't true leaving the reader so speculate if this is
just your opinion.
To quote you.
"Major problem is that people think that the truth is that which suits their desires and concepts."
Self prophecy fulfilled.
"Let's face it, using firearms and bombs as those jihad-minded Muslims did in the city of Paris on November 13, 2015 can make a greater "slaughter among them " then a sword can."

From Quran.
47:4. "Whenever you encounter the unbelievers strike off their heads until you make a great slaughter among them..."
http://www.citizenwarrior.com/2016/06/do-you-know-why-isis-kills-people-in.html

Please cite sources else your posts are mere opinions.
I seldom post mere opinions of mine but RESEARCH cite and post with sources thus
taking mere opinion out of the equation.
Sometimes I might post an opinion. That would be a post without a citation.
My opinion of Islam believers that commit atrocities is.....................................
Use your imagination but no need to post what you simply imagine.
That would be as useless for debate as a mere opinion.
About the political move to ban or confiscate firearms for what radical Islamics have
done underscored by Obama:
Does he plan on confiscating our pressure cookers? What about fertilizer or cutlery or jetliners? Would that make us safer?
All the above have been used by believers of Islam to commit atrocities against
innocent non believers.
Is it not possible to take verses from the Tanahk that are taken out of context as well and twist them to what you wish them to say? From Genesis (Bere****) God is angry. He decides to destroy all humans, beasts, creeping things, fowls, and "all flesh wherein there is breath of life." He plans to drown them all. 6:7, 17 From Leviticus: If a man has sex with his father's wife, kill them both. 20:11 If a man "lies" with his daughter-in-law, then both must be killed. 20:12 If a man has sex with another man, kill them both. 20:13 And on and on. One can easily take verses out of context and eschew them to some means to harm another. Your faith is no different in that regard than the faith of Islam that you clearly loathe so much.
  1. If you "lie" with your wife and your mother-in-law (now that sounds fun!), then all three of you must be burned to death. 20:14
 
Top