I am black. Referring to me as black is fine.What race/ethnicity are you, if you don't mind saying? How would you like people to refer to that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am black. Referring to me as black is fine.What race/ethnicity are you, if you don't mind saying? How would you like people to refer to that?
Actually according to my understanding; with light, white is a combination of all colors, and black is the color of no light at all.My thoughts? Black and white aren't colors.
Me either.I don't think using color as a description is a bad thing overall.
Hence the origin of the term"people of color".Usually the trouble starts when one feels superior over someone else because of it.
Why do you say that?Your ilk must be a real trouble maker at parties.
(I know, for I am in that same boat.)
I was having a conversation with a white person who referred to me and people like me as people/persons of color. I responded by referring to him and people like him as people/persons of color. He responded that people of color consist of only black or brown people, and I retorted white is just as much of a color as black, brown, or anything else and if he wanted to refer to black or brown people, he should use those words rather than something vague and incorrect. Upon further investigation I found out the term was originally coined by 17th century racists who wanted to distinguish white people from non whites, but fell out of favor shortly afterwords only to be brought back in the 1970’s by black and brown racists who wanted to separate white people from all the other races. Most of the people I know who use the term are not bigots or racists yet use the term coined by bigots and racists. Are these people just parroting something they’ve heard someone else use without thinking what these words actually mean? Or something else? Your thoughts?
What' the difference between color vs colour?Grey isn't a colour?
We got there eventually. Where were you 45 minutes ago?Actually according to my understanding; with light, white is a combination of all colors, and black is the color of no light at all.
They use the latter spelling on the other side of the pond.What' the difference between color vs colour?
You speak of reflectivity.Colors are interesting. For example, blue is every color but blue because that is the color it reflects. So technically, each color is every color except the color it's called.
Of course, seeing as how I'm experiencing reflective consciousness.You speak of reflectivity.
Only the CVT.But there's transmitted color.
You have something against "trans"?
The color that isn't a color is one of my favorite colors.Grey isn't a colour?
I think there's a 'grey' area.BTW, "colour" just looks ignant.
Yeah; the term "people of color" is a term originated in the US so I can understand it not being a thing in Middle East Asia. As far as a need to make clear when referring to a minority vs majority, why not just use the term "minority" or "majority"? At least using that term will include far east Asians as well as all the other minorities, the term people of color seems to exclude them.I'm not white, myself, and I find the term "people of color" extremely American-centric and limited. Nobody I know where I live (in the Middle East) would describe themselves as being "of color," nor would most think of that as a primary identifying factor about themselves. Many of us even look white or white-ish as far as skin color goes.
That said, I can see the usefulness of the term in the context of the US and other white-majority countries. Sometimes there's a need to make it clear whether one is referring to the majority or a minority, and the term "people of color" serves a purpose there.
I do associate the term with the US.I'm not white, myself, and I find the term "people of color" extremely American-centric and limited. Nobody I know where I live (in the Middle East) would describe themselves as being "of color," nor would most think of that as a primary identifying factor about themselves. Many of us even look white or white-ish as far as skin color goes.
That said, I can see the usefulness of the term in the context of the US and other white-majority countries. Sometimes there's a need to make it clear whether one is referring to the majority or a minority, and the term "people of color" serves a purpose there.
I do associate the term with the US.
White is all colours in the colour spectrum. Black is a lack of any colour.My thoughts? Black and white aren't colors.
I'm a bit wan today.I'm sure a person of color like you would do that.
Yeah; the term "people of color" is a term originated in the US so I can understand it not being a thing in Middle East Asia. As far as a need to make clear when referring to a minority vs majority, why not just use the term "minority" or "majority"? At least using that term will include far east Asians as well as all the other minorities, the term people of color seems to exclude them.
So they're "persons of no color"?White is all colours in the colour spectrum. Black is a lack of any colour.
My point is; why would someone who is against bigotry and racism, embrace terms coined by bigots and racists?From what I've read, it seems that Asians are also supposed to be "of color." I also find that a strange and American-centric classification, though.