https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGLABm7jJ-Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApZ59MSty4o
"Where's your moral high ground now, vegetarians?" xD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApZ59MSty4o
"Where's your moral high ground now, vegetarians?" xD
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGLABm7jJ-Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApZ59MSty4o
"Where's your moral high ground now, vegetarians?" xD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGLABm7jJ-Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApZ59MSty4o
"Where's your moral high ground now, vegetarians?" xD
Ridiculous.
We eschew meat because we abhor suffering, and suffering presupposes consciousness, self awareness.
These links describe plant responses to environmental stimuli, but falsely draws analogies to mammalian responses. The responses described don't translate to self-awareness, consciousness, or the ability to suffer in the way a creature with a nervous system might suffer.
So, how long have you been a fruitarian?
1). The neural mechanisms that mediate suffering in animals are lacking in plants.How do you know that the plant doesn't suffer? It has external reactions to what would be suffering to an animal, and vigorously defends itself at times.
Would feeling pain benefit them?Just because they operate differently, or have a different way to function with their surroundings, doesn't mean that they don't feel pain.
Ridiculous.
suffering presupposes consciousness, .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGLABm7jJ-Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApZ59MSty4o
"Where's your moral high ground now, vegetarians?" xD
How about animals that are killed without inflicting suffering, as with stunning methods?Ridiculous.
We eschew meat because we abhor suffering, and suffering presupposes consciousness, self awareness.
That would be theft. I'm not a fan of that, either.How about animals that are killed without inflicting suffering, as with stunning methods?
That would be theft. I'm not a fan of that, either.
Theft implies ownership, so theft of whom? And if you reply with some sort of notion that an animal owns its own life, then you're simply playing fast and loose with the meaning of "own," which is next to ludicrous and begs rejection.That would be theft. I'm not a fan of that, either.
I'm not. We get hungry. We kill things, then we eat them. This is simply how the world works, and I didn't make up how the world works, and if I did I would've made it very differently.
It doesn't matter if it's a carrot or a chicken, some of us have just come up with a vertebrate bias to convince ourselves that we're not doing harm.
I'm not. We get hungry. We kill things, then we eat them. This is simply how the world works, and I didn't make up how the world works, and if I did I would've made it very differently.
It doesn't matter if it's a carrot or a chicken, some of us have just come up with a vertebrate bias to convince ourselves that we're not doing harm.
How about animals that are killed without inflicting suffering, as with stunning methods?