Why do you think this? Don't you like here ideas and values?Naw. AOC. She's the perfect neutron bomb material.
Kamala is like Hillary. Narcissistic and only interested in her career.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why do you think this? Don't you like here ideas and values?Naw. AOC. She's the perfect neutron bomb material.
Kamala is like Hillary. Narcissistic and only interested in her career.
Definitely, but she's much more destructive than the others with her ditzy mindedness.So is AOC. Most of them are.
She's an activist. Emotionally drivin.Why do you think this? Don't you like here ideas and values?
I don't understand why Trump is bothering to run in another election. He doesn't accept legitimate elections anyway, so he should just bypass something he won't accept when he loses again and just march right into the White House and declare himself the King. Why bother with the democratic process at all?
Ye would suck being he supported Hitler on Alex Jones show and even somehow made Jones seem saneYou now have such stellar independent candidates such as Liz Cheney, Howard Stern, Andrew Yang, Ye and The Rock to vote for.
Definitely, but she's much more destructive than the others with her ditzy mindedness.
Which ideas are ditzy? She speaks from historical example, and her ideas are reasonable. It's the conservatives who lead with emotion and consider conventionalism reasonable.She's an activist. Emotionally drivin.
Not a political expert with capabilities to institute policy along with the proper foresight to foresee what impact a policy will cause.
Her end of the world prediction.Which ideas are ditzy?
If Trump is convicted, he can walk round & round in his prison cell.They're too old to run for president. They'll walk for president instead.
I don't doubt that misogyny plays a part.Which ideas are ditzy? She speaks from historical example, and her ideas are reasonable. It's the conservatives who lead with emotion and consider conventionalism reasonable.
Just as it did with Dems who dissed Palin as ditzy.I don't doubt that misogyny plays a part.
Ah -- I see your point. "World ending" was rather hyperbolic, but I think she's just reflecting the views of many climate scientists and the looming threat of unrecoverable tipping points being triggered.Her end of the world prediction.
Ocasio Cortez: ‘The World is Going to End In Twelve Years If We Don’t Address Climate Change’
“Millennials and people, you know, Gen Z and all these folks that will come after us are looking up and we’re like: ‘The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?’” Ocasio-Cortez told interviewer Tanehisi Coates at an...news.yahoo.com
Currently, we have 2458 days before we all die.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez World Ending Countdown Clock
Countdown to Jan 21, 2030. Showing days, hours, minutes and seconds ticking down to 0www.timeanddate.com
Palin was ditzy. She was a reactionary. pandering to nativists. She led with emotionalism rather than facts or analysis.Just as it did with Dems who dissed Palin as ditzy.
The closest I could come to Sarah in male Democrats was Al Gore. Not all that bright. right far more often than Sarah, but terrible at getting his message out and he seemed like Sarah grossly overestimate his intelligence. In college he performed worse than George Bush. He had a fair amount of hoof in mouth disease due to his arrogance at times. He was essentially right about AGW but so badly overstated when the problems would occur and how serious that they would be that people are still fighting his exaggerations today. The real thing is bad enough. There was no need to turn it up to 11.Ah -- I see your point. "World ending" was rather hyperbolic, but I think she's just reflecting the views of many climate scientists and the looming threat of unrecoverable tipping points being triggered.
People go into denial in the face of massive threats. They feel helpless and dismiss them. Cassandras and their discomfiting facts are ignored or laughed at.
Palin was ditzy. She was a reactionary. pandering to nativists. She led with emotionalism rather than facts or analysis.
That's some very partisan rationalizationAh -- I see your point. "World ending" was rather hyperbolic, but I think she's just reflecting the views of many climate scientists and the looming threat of unrecoverable tipping points being triggered.
People go into denial in the face of massive threats. They feel helpless and dismiss them. Cassandras and their discomfiting facts are ignored or laughed at.
Palin was ditzy. She was a reactionary. pandering to nativists. She led with emotionalism rather than facts or analysis.
She left the democratic party, and is currently unaffiliated. Perhaps she could run as an independent?I still want Tulsi. I regret throwing away my primary votes on sellout Bernie.
Who is better? DeSantis? Trump pandered to Christo-fascists but was not one. DeSantis is! Pence is, Haley is, Scott is, etc. The current crop of GOP folks are theocrats. Who is left?I predict Trump will not be the republican candidate for president. It would be fun if he were, because the nation needs to see just how insane and totally FUBAR the republican party has become. And he would surely lose even bigger, again, if he did run. And that would be a good thing for us all to see and acknowledge. But national republicans are already seeing him as a liability both to the party and to their own political careers. And even at the state level where the MAGA insanity is strongest he is losing ground due to the completely idiotic and incompetent behavior of his political toadies in office.
The whole right wing Christo-fascist extremist era of American politics is coming to an end. Thank the gods! It'll take a while to purge the poison from the halls of government. But it's already begun, and it will continue.
Sure, if one were to pretend there wasn't a mountain of legitimate criticisms.Just as it did with Dems who dissed Palin as ditzy.
That's how it always goes....fervent partisansSure, if one were to pretend there wasn't a mountain of legitimate criticisms.
In AOC's case, her crimes are being liberal, outspoken, and female.
I never suggested anything of the sort. It's silly to suggest that one side is wholly good while the other is wholly bad, but it's also silly to suggest that each side is equally proportionate in goodness/badness.That's how it always goes....fervent partisans
see the worst in their foes, & only saints in
their own. It's hypocrisy.
No, you dint suggest.I never suggested anything of the sort.
Straw man.It's silly to suggest that one side is wholly good while the other is wholly bad, but it's also silly to suggest that each side is equally proportionate in goodness/badness.