Cop dies in the line of duty while heroically saving the life of swimmer in distress
I wonder how many policeman won't be able to be thanked.
I wonder how many policeman won't be able to be thanked.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This news article was from two years ago. Am I wrong to suspect that this was googled up as a response to the recent threads highlighting police misconduct?Cop dies in the line of duty while heroically saving the life of swimmer in distress
I wonder how many policeman won't be able to be thanked.
Yes, you are right... it is an attempt to balance things... would you like a more recent one?This news article was from two years ago. Am I wrong to suspect that this was googled up as a response to the recent threads highlighting police misconduct?
This news article was from two years ago. Am I wrong to suspect that this was googled up as a response to the recent threads highlighting police misconduct?
That being said... when police are bad, they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.This news article was from two years ago. Am I wrong to suspect that this was googled up as a response to the recent threads highlighting police misconduct?
What do you mean by "balance"? Nobody was suggesting that law enforcement wasn't a necessity, nor that there are no heroes among them.Yes, you are right... it is an attempt to balance things... would you like a more recent one?
And when they're good, it should be acknowledged and commended.That being said... when police are bad, they need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
I'm sorry, let me rephrase.What do you mean by "balance"? Nobody was suggesting that law enforcement wasn't a necessity, nor that there are no heroes among them.
Would you prefer that misconduct, incompetence, corruption simply be brushed under the rug to preserve some idealistic image? If honor and valor truly matter, wouldn't you rather they be held to a professional standard?
Uncritical hero worship of people in uniform contributes to the problem. They're humans, not infallible exemplars and embodiments of justice.
And when they're good, it should be acknowledged and commended.
A newspiece on good cops is just as valid as those on the nasty psychopaths that departments hire.I'm sorry, let me rephrase.
If all we get is a litany of what is wrong with cops, the balance I am talking about is simply let's also list some good. Nothing more and nothing less.
I think the rest I addressed in another post.
I like to add another story of a cop doing the right thing who should have been thanked but wasn't.That was my attempt. Perhaps not expertly, but my intent
What do you mean by "balance"? Nobody was suggesting that law enforcement wasn't a necessity, nor that there are no heroes among them.
Would you prefer that misconduct, incompetence, corruption simply be brushed under the rug to preserve some idealistic image? If honor and valor truly matter, wouldn't you rather they be held to a professional standard?
Uncritical hero worship of people in uniform contributes to the problem. They're humans, not infallible exemplars and embodiments of justice.
Does it matter?This news article was from two years ago. Am I wrong to suspect that this was googled up as a response to the recent threads highlighting police misconduct?
Of course, but our culture teaches us to hero worship both military and law enforcement, to the point where the reaction toward anything less than praise is knee-jerk denial. Same with U.S. founding fathers. obviously they've done some good and important things but they weren't without flaws, faults, and failings. Some consider it unpatriotic to acknowledge that dark side.I don't know all of what's been said in recent threads, but to be fair, some people do literally want to abolish the police:
Opinion | Yes, We Mean Literally Abolish the Police (Published 2020)
I understand neither one-dimensional praise nor blame for police. Like every other profession on the planet, there are police who are good at their jobs and police who are bad at their jobs, police who want to make the world better and safer and those who are self-centered, power-hungry, and entered the profession for the wrong reasons.
It "matters" if people prefer that ugly truths be hidden rather than exposed simply for the sake of emotional comfort. That's why I asked.Does it matter?
It "matters" if people prefer that ugly truths be hidden rather than exposed simply for the sake of emotional comfort. That's why I asked.
I wasn't saying that good stories weren't "valid". Both heroism and corruption should be made known to the public. My issue would be with those who, out of idolization/adoration of cops, might seek to downplay or distract from the stories that expose abuse and misconduct.A newspiece on good cops is just as valid as those on the nasty psychopaths that departments hire.
I always liked the Andy Griffith style of policework.
What the U.S Can Learn from Countries Where Cops Are Unarmed
My reading is fine. I found it odd that you only questioned when something good was posted.God damn, you're reading comprehension sucks, son.