• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Politics of Shaving

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If you say so good sir, but i am sure that the good american voters would have voted slightly differently if she had to shave her face more than once every few months
Oh, those women....always blaming their failures on sexism.
I saw her campaign.
It was less than inspiring.
If she were a he, results would've been no better.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Ahh, a breitbart article... Then i believe every word... Thats called sarcasm

But i see no mention of lesbian. You do realise that branding every woman you hate is equal to me branding you as gay... Ok right... Is that more sarcasm

No...what I mean is that lesbians can be accused of partiality...of being biased, when it deals with men's issues.

A man or a straight woman should write Gillette commercial.
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
This is more serious than people think: Lois, the classical American woman coming from a wealthy family with a petulant attitude and a masculine voice who married a submissive simpleton. Why? To dominate him...because these women are masculine inside, so they are not compatible with dominant men. Their masculinity expresses itself in anger and intellectual domination, and sometimes violence

so...Hillary Clinton, Lois= toxic masculinity
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
Gillette was trying to sell more product. They thought if they leverage the tide of PC nagging, they could shame more men into being more transsexual, and thereby need to buy more razors for the entire body.

Marketing aside, it is not healthy for men to become artificial to appease the bizzaro world of Progressive thinking. Instead they need to be true to their instinctive natures as men.

If you compare the men of the golden generation to the progressive men of today, who became unnatural, true toxic masculinity is in the image of the Progressive man. There is more divorce, illegitimacy, abortion, identity crisis, drug addiction, laziness and even unshaven sloth, in men who has been made unnatural. The golden generation was responsible, dependable, groomed, active, ingenious, and able to make a stand to evil, including toxic femininity.

The golden generation would have jobs for life because men at the highest levels were honorable. Now the unnatural men in the same high positions are self serving mercenaries. There is no team. They are in more in the image of the Democrat party master and slave, where master owes their slaves nothing.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
This is more serious than people think: Lois, the classical American woman coming from a wealthy family with a petulant attitude and a masculine voice who married a submissive simpleton. Why? To dominate him...because these women are masculine inside, so they are not compatible with dominant men. Their masculinity expresses itself in anger and intellectual domination, and sometimes violence

so...Hillary Clinton, Lois= toxic masculinity
Just a note here....
Family Guy is one of the very few shows where inter-gender violence
isn't the ubiquitous women abusing men for humor. It often turns the
tables, with both Lois & Meg enduring violent beatings.
It's kind of progressive, eh.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Just a note here....
Family Guy is one of the very few shows where inter-gender violence
isn't the ubiquitous women abusing men for humor. It often turns the
tables, with both Lois & Meg enduring violent beatings.
It's kind of progressive, eh.

Well...I guess the Italian Connie D'Amico is the emblem of toxic femininity....having fun trashing unlucky girls like Meg...
 

Shad

Veteran Member
I'm curious as to how this could be seen as a "political" statement, rather than simply a social one.
Regardless, I only shave to touch-up the areas around my beard.

Toxic masculinity has been a leftist talking point for years. It is has become both.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Toxic masculinity has been a leftist talking point for years. It is has become both.
It's like the cry of "White privilege!" & "Male privilege".
All such cries seek to tarnish an entire group, both innocent & malefactor alike.
And there's no defense because they can always point to one wrongdoer or
one victim, & exclaim "See! Thar she blows!".
OK, that was a lousy metaphor. But you get the picture.
It's a tool to segregate all people into groups of perps & victims.
And once assigned, individuality evaporates as the group defines your status.
 
Top