• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Poll: Is Woke a new religion?

Poll: Is Woke a new religion?

  • Uncomfortably so.

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • In some ways, yes

    Votes: 7 24.1%
  • Very little

    Votes: 5 17.2%
  • No, and I'm offended by the question

    Votes: 12 41.4%

  • Total voters
    29

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
Apart from not enumerating a "god" (afaik), do other characteristics of "woke" align with religions?

In the sense that folks who identify with that kind of ideology can be dogmatic and engage in black and white, simplistic thinking, sure.

Beyond that, calling it a religion is a stretch.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
The opposite of "sleepin', man".

In other words a vernacular term for being alert to racial injustice and awareness of one's rights as a member of a racial minority.

So using "woke" as a term of disparagement is a handy way of making fun of concerns about racial injustice.

So its about race/racial?
 

Yerda

Veteran Member
Apart from not enumerating a "god" (afaik), do other characteristics of "woke" align with religions?
More of an outlook, from what I gather.

No-one I know calls themselves woke, and I don't really ever hear of it beyond a few, terminally online, exasperated dopes fretting that the wokes are coming to take away free speech, cancel the West and trans all the children.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Apart from not enumerating a "god" (afaik), do other characteristics of "woke" align with religions?

megafacepalm.jpg
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
I will say I don't think I have heard anyone ever seriously refer to themselves as "woke" as an identifying ideology.
Wyatt Cenac has described himself as woke in at least one of his shows (I think it was HBO, policing in America was central and overall topic in it).
 

Left Coast

This Is Water
Staff member
Premium Member
Wyatt Cenac has described himself as woke in at least one of his shows (I think it was HBO, policing in America was central and overall topic in it).

I also recall seeing a dude holding a sign that said "Stay Woke!" at a BLM protest.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
More of an outlook, from what I gather.

No-one I know calls themselves woke, and I don't really ever hear of it beyond a few, terminally online, exasperated dopes fretting that the wokes are coming to take away free speech, cancel the West and trans all the children.

It seems that "woke" is just the latest euphemism for what used to be called "politically correct," although that term still seems to be used. There's a movie from 1994 called PCU which parodies political correctness: PCU (1994) - IMDb

Interestingly, I came across a more recent article about that movie, addressing claims that Hollywood is trying to bury the movie because it...well...isn't woke. But apparently that's not the case: Did You Know 'PCU' Was Being Canceled? (It's Not) (nofilmschool.com)

That article has some more interesting thoughts about "woke" culture.

The irony is that, after 30+ years of PC, or "wokeness," we seemingly have more hatred, bigotry, and intolerance now than we did 30-40 years ago.

That's why it's subject to even more criticism nowadays, since it doesn't work. It's a failed tactic.
 

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
Woke isn't a religion. It's become a slur/trigger word used by fragile snowflakes.
(Yes, I am aware of the irony--it's deliberate.) ;)
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
The only people I ever see using the term "woke" are conservatives, and only in reference to anything they either don't like or don't understand, so no, obviously not a religion.

Also, ****-poor poll options.

Not really. Sure, they're the loudest, but I have issues with some of the current habit of publically cancelling people, history, or other items.

I ain't conservative.

Just maybe not loud and obnoxious enough to be noticed.
 
Last edited:

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
Not really. Sure, they're the loudest, but I have issues with some of the current habit of publically cancelling people, history, or other items.

I ain't conservative.

Just might be loud and obnoxious enough to be noticed.

How often does public "canceling" happen, though? From what I have seen, it's usually that a private entity or platform refuses to host someone or their speech, and they or someone else considers this "cancellation" and complains about it while the "canceled" person gets a massive amount of publicity and support from other groups.

An example of this is Dave Chappelle: his content is still on Netflix, he has a lot of fans, and he's still speaking his mind publicly... yet some will say he was "canceled" and treat him as a martyr. And even if Netflix had dropped his content, that wouldn't have canceled him because 1) it's a private platform, and 2) he could have marketed himself elsewhere.

The same goes for the subject of history: a lot of the controversies I have seen in that regard seem to me overblown at best. Saying that Mount Rushmore may be problematic or that it is inappropriate to celebrate Columbus despite his crimes doesn't seem to me an example of "canceling" any history in the slightest, because it doesn't remove any facts from history classes and books or change anything about written history. But there are people who may passionately argue that these are examples of "canceling" history.

There are some instances of overreaction and excessive groupthink, sure, but overall, I think most canceling and demonization of people or even entire groups, distortion of history, and vilification of items associated with "evil groups" (e.g., Pagans) come from the groups who most often use "woke" as a term of denigration toward others.
 

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
How often does public "canceling" happen, though? From what I have seen, it's usually that a private entity or platform refuses to host someone or their speech, and they or someone else considers this "cancellation" and complains about it while the "canceled" person gets a massive amount of publicity and support from other groups.

An example of this is Dave Chappelle: his content is still on Netflix, he has a lot of fans, and he's still speaking his mind publicly... yet some will say he was "canceled" and treat him as a martyr. And even if Netflix had dropped his content, that wouldn't have canceled him because 1) it's a private platform, and 2) he could have marketed himself elsewhere.

The same goes for the subject of history: a lot of the controversies I have seen in that regard seem to me overblown at best. Saying that Mount Rushmore may be problematic or that it is inappropriate to celebrate Columbus despite his crimes doesn't seem to me an example of "canceling" any history in the slightest, because it doesn't remove any facts from history classes and books or change anything about written history. But there are people who may passionately argue that these are examples of "canceling" history.

There are some instances of overreaction and excessive groupthink, sure, but overall, I think most canceling and demonization of people or even entire groups, distortion of history, and vilification of items associated with "evil groups" (e.g., Pagans) come from the groups who most often use "woke" as a term of denigration toward others.
Being “cancelled” is just a marketing tactic imo.
Boycotts have existed for decades. They were a way that supposedly made the voice/opinion of the public known, through peaceful means.
Seems as though those who don’t like facing the consequences of their own actions/opinions like to cry victim and claim that they’re being cancelled, as though it were an affront to their own rights.
Like JK Rowling or that lady who threw a temper tantrum when her book wasn’t published. Only for it to be published by another company. I’ll see if I can track her down, because it was a pretty weird situation lol

To be fair though, folks across the political spectrum have used such publicity to their advantage
 
Last edited:

SomeRandom

Still learning to be wise
Staff member
Premium Member
In my country there is no wokeism.
Wokeism is in the US.
Where drag queens read fairy tales to children.
You never had Dame Edna Everage read fairy tales to your kids?
How sheltered you guys must be!
Poor possums!!

(I’m mostly joking. But “drag performance” is actually an entertainment tradition in the West that technically goes back centuries.
Lols I guess Ancient Greek theatre was woke all along, eh?)
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
But it wouldn't be woke to have...trans women like you read fairy tales to kids?
I have trans women who are friends of mine. They are not interested in reading fairy tales to kindergarten or first grade kids because that's not their job. They are neither teachers nor entertainers.
And they are not interested in working with kids.
They and I gossip about men, that's what we are into.

And by the way....
I have remarked something that I find really weird. Here trans women are into men, except very rare cases.
I am not understanding why so many trans women are into cisgender women, in the United States. I find it really weird, honestly.
 
Top